| Literature DB >> 36067142 |
Md Atikur Rahaman1, H M Kamrul Hassan2, Ahmed Al Asheq3,4, K M Anwarul Islam5.
Abstract
The maturity and growth of social media have empowered online customers to generate electronic word of mouth (eWOM), on various online websites and platforms, which may influence an individual's decision-making process. This paper explores eWOM information's impact on social media users' purchase intention by applying the information adoption model (IAM) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). PLS-SEM (SmartPLS V.3.3) has been utilized to test the hypotheses using data of 432 respondents. The research findings evinced that eWOM information quality, credibility, usefulness, and ease of use have been critical in determining online consumers' intention to adopt eWOM and form purchase behavior on social media. The study's outcomes offer the marketing managers a viewpoint to realize the significance of the effect of eWOM information on online purchase intention among social media users. Furthermore, the study findings will also enlighten marketing and business managers to utilize social media websites by gauging consumer behavior and focusing on characteristics of eWOM information on social media for better consumer insights.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36067142 PMCID: PMC9447927 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Conceptual model of the study.
Demographic information.
| Variables | Items | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Below 20 years | 69 | 15.97% |
| 20–25 years | 144 | 33.33% | |
| 25–30 years | 182 | 42.13% | |
| Above 30 years | 37 | 8.56% | |
| Gender | Female | 165 | 38.19% |
| Male | 267 | 61.81% | |
| Education Level | Undergraduate | 187 | 43.29% |
| Postgraduate | 245 | 56.71% | |
| Social media using experience | Less than 1 year | 132 | 30.56% |
| 1–3 years | 273 | 63.19% | |
| >3 years | 27 | 6.25% |
**n = 432
Construct validity results.
| Constructs | Items | Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eWOM Information quality (IQ) | IQ1 | 0.82 | 0.774 | 0.869 | 0.688 |
| IQ3 | 0.858 | ||||
| IQ4 | 0.809 | ||||
| eWOM Information credibility (IC) | IC1 | 0.774 | 0.77 | 0.853 | 0.592 |
| IC2 | 0.757 | ||||
| IC3 | 0.823 | ||||
| IC4 | 0.72 | ||||
| eWOM Ease of use (EOU) | EOU1 | 0.844 | 0.675 | 0.859 | 0.753 |
| EOU2 | 0.891 | ||||
| eWOM Usefulness (USE) | USE1 | 0.759 | 0.615 | 0.796 | 0.565 |
| USE2 | 0.776 | ||||
| USE3 | 0.72 | ||||
| eWOM Information Adoption (INAD) | INAD1 | 0.747 | 0.78 | 0.858 | 0.603 |
| INAD2 | 0.807 | ||||
| INAD3 | 0.827 | ||||
| INAD4 | 0.72 | ||||
| Purchase Intention (PI) | PI1 | 0.7 | 0.793 | 0.866 | 0.619 |
| PI2 | 0.831 | ||||
| PI3 | 0.823 | ||||
| PI4 | 0.787 |
Discriminant validity.
| Fornell and Larcker’s criterion | ||||||
| IQ | IC | EOU | USE | INAD | PI | |
| IQ | 0.829 | |||||
| IC | 0.371 | 0.769 | ||||
| EOU | 0.395 | 0.557 | 0.868 | |||
| USE | 0.33 | 0.416 | 0.405 | 0.752 | ||
| INAD | 0.52 | 0.451 | 0.552 | 0.489 | 0.777 | |
| PI | 0.334 | 0.375 | 0.457 | 0.517 | 0.492 | 0.787 |
| Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) | ||||||
| IQ | IC | EOU | USE | INAD | PI | |
| IQ | ||||||
| IC | 0.476 | |||||
| EOU | 0.535 | 0.765 | ||||
| USE | 0.482 | 0.595 | 0.624 | |||
| INAD | 0.667 | 0.575 | 0.752 | 0.701 | ||
| PI | 0.42 | 0.473 | 0.612 | 0.734 | 0.614 | |
Fig 2Path coefficients of the model.
Path coefficients.
| Hypothesis | Path | Beta | SE | T-value | P Values | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | IQ -> EOU | 0.219 | 0.045 | 4.882 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H2 | IQ -> USE | 0.204 | 0.051 | 3.996 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H3 | IC -> EOU | 0.476 | 0.057 | 8.388 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H4 | IC -> USE | 0.341 | 0.063 | 5.396 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H5 | EOU -> INAD | 0.424 | 0.050 | 8.514 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H6 | EOU -> PI | 0.203 | 0.055 | 3.703 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H7 | USE -> INAD | 0.317 | 0.054 | 5.913 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H8 | USE -> PI | 0.327 | 0.053 | 6.196 | 0.000 | Accepted |
| H9 | INAD -> PI | 0.221 | 0.068 | 3.227 | 0.001 | Accepted |
Predictive relevance Q2, effect sizes (f2), and coefficient of determination R2.
|
|
|
| Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase Intention | 0.37 | 0.219 | ||
| eWOM Information Adoption | 0.047 | Small | ||
| eWOM Information Adoption | 0.389 | 0.227 | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use of Information | 0.246 | Medium | ||
| Perceived Usefulness of Information | 0.138 | Small | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use of Information | 0.351 | 0.26 | ||
| Information Quality of Information | 0.064 | Small | ||
| Information Credibility of Information | 0.301 | Medium | ||
| Perceived Usefulness of Information | 0.209 | 0.116 | ||
| Information Quality of Information | 0.045 | Small | ||
| Information Credibility of Information | 0.127 | Small |