Isabela R Marques1, Izabela P Calvi2, Sara A Cruz2, Luana M F Sanchez3, Isis F Baroni4, Christi Oommen5, Eduardo M H Padrao5, Paula C Mari6. 1. Division of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Josep Trueta Street, 08195, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Catalunya, Spain. belamarques@uic.es. 2. Division of Medicine, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Kaliningrad Oblast, Russia. 3. Neurology Division, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, USA. 4. Emergency Medicine Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Internal Medicine Division, University of Connecticut, New England, Farmington, CT, USA. 6. Pediatric Division, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common typical bacterial cause of pneumonia among children. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 5-day Amoxicillin-based empiric treatment. However, longer treatments are frequently used. This study aimed to compare shorter and longer Amoxicillin regimens for children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 5-day and 10-day courses of Amoxicillin for the treatment of CAP in children older than 6 months in an outpatient setting. Studies involving overlapping populations, lower-than-standard antibiotic doses, and hospitalized patients were excluded. The outcome of interest was clinical cure. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Two independent authors conducted the critical appraisal of the included studies according to the RoB-2 tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool to evaluate the certainty of evidence of our results. Three RCTs and 789 children aged from 6 months to 10 years were included, of whom 385 (48.8%) underwent a 5-day regimen. Amoxicillin-based therapy was used in 774 (98%) patients. No differences were found between 5-day and 10-day therapy regarding clinical cure (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.49; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis of children aged 6-71 months showed no difference in the rates of the same outcome (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.38; I2 = 0%). The GRADE tool suggested moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a short course of Amoxicillin (5 days) is just as effective as a longer course (10 days) for uncomplicated CAP in children under 10 years old. Nevertheless, generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic settings of the studies included.PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022328519. WHAT IS KNOWN: • In the outpatient setting, a few international guidelines recommend a 10-day Amoxicillin course as first-line treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). • Recent trials have shown that shorter courses of Amoxicillin may be as effective as 10-day regimens in uncomplicated pneumonia. WHAT IS NEW: • When comparing 5-day to 10-day Amoxicillin regimens, evidence suggests no significant difference in clinical cure rates for uncomplicated CAP in outpatient settings. • Generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic context of the population within the included studies.
Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common typical bacterial cause of pneumonia among children. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 5-day Amoxicillin-based empiric treatment. However, longer treatments are frequently used. This study aimed to compare shorter and longer Amoxicillin regimens for children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 5-day and 10-day courses of Amoxicillin for the treatment of CAP in children older than 6 months in an outpatient setting. Studies involving overlapping populations, lower-than-standard antibiotic doses, and hospitalized patients were excluded. The outcome of interest was clinical cure. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Two independent authors conducted the critical appraisal of the included studies according to the RoB-2 tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool to evaluate the certainty of evidence of our results. Three RCTs and 789 children aged from 6 months to 10 years were included, of whom 385 (48.8%) underwent a 5-day regimen. Amoxicillin-based therapy was used in 774 (98%) patients. No differences were found between 5-day and 10-day therapy regarding clinical cure (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.49; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis of children aged 6-71 months showed no difference in the rates of the same outcome (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.98-1.05; p = 0.38; I2 = 0%). The GRADE tool suggested moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that a short course of Amoxicillin (5 days) is just as effective as a longer course (10 days) for uncomplicated CAP in children under 10 years old. Nevertheless, generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic settings of the studies included.PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022328519. WHAT IS KNOWN: • In the outpatient setting, a few international guidelines recommend a 10-day Amoxicillin course as first-line treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). • Recent trials have shown that shorter courses of Amoxicillin may be as effective as 10-day regimens in uncomplicated pneumonia. WHAT IS NEW: • When comparing 5-day to 10-day Amoxicillin regimens, evidence suggests no significant difference in clinical cure rates for uncomplicated CAP in outpatient settings. • Generalizations should be made with caution considering the socioeconomic context of the population within the included studies.
Authors: John S Bradley; Carrie L Byington; Samir S Shah; Brian Alverson; Edward R Carter; Christopher Harrison; Sheldon L Kaplan; Sharon E Mace; George H McCracken; Matthew R Moore; Shawn D St Peter; Jana A Stockwell; Jack T Swanson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Julia A Bielicki; Wolfgang Stöhr; Sam Barratt; David Dunn; Nishdha Naufal; Damian Roland; Kate Sturgeon; Adam Finn; Juan Pablo Rodriguez-Ruiz; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Colin Powell; Saul N Faust; Anastasia E Alcock; Dani Hall; Gisela Robinson; Daniel B Hawcutt; Mark D Lyttle; Diana M Gibb; Mike Sharland Journal: JAMA Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Derek J Williams; C Buddy Creech; Emmanuel B Walter; Judith M Martin; Jeffrey S Gerber; Jason G Newland; Lee Howard; Meghan E Hofto; Mary A Staat; Randolph E Oler; Bonifride Tuyishimire; Thomas M Conrad; Marina S Lee; Varduhi Ghazaryan; Melinda M Pettigrew; Vance G Fowler; Henry F Chambers; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Scott Evans; W Charles Huskins Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 26.796
Authors: Jeffrey M Pernica; Stuart Harman; April J Kam; Redjana Carciumaru; Thuva Vanniyasingam; Tyrus Crawford; Dale Dalgleish; Sarah Khan; Robert S Slinger; Martha Fulford; Cheryl Main; Marek Smieja; Lehana Thabane; Mark Loeb Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193