Seifeldin Sadek1, Hadi Ramadan2, Tamar Matitashvili2, Laurel Stadtmauer2. 1. Department of ObGyn, Eastern Virginia Medical School, The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, 601 Colley Avenue, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA. ses2020@qatar-med.cornell.edu. 2. Department of ObGyn, Eastern Virginia Medical School, The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, 601 Colley Avenue, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Follicular curetting is the gentle and rapidly rotating movement of the aspiration needle in a clockwise and counterclockwise fashion. The aim of our study is to assess this retrieval technique comparing cycle and pregnancy outcomes between curetting and non-curetting. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 817 patients that underwent oocyte retrieval at our fertility center from January 1st, 2016 until August 31st, 2019. All patients enrolled in the study underwent standard ovarian stimulation protocols. Three physicians routinely utilized follicle curetting during oocyte retrieval, while a fourth physician did not curette. Retrievals and embryo transfers were performed based on a rotating physician schedule. RESULTS: Retrievals that were performed using a curetting technique had a significantly higher number of total oocytes retrieved 12.4 ± 8.1 vs 10.7 ± 7.5 (p = 0.01), and number of M2 oocytes retrieved 8.1 ± 6.4 vs 6.9 ± 6.0 (p = 0.03), resulting in an increased M2 oocyte yield 63.7% ± 41.3 vs 50.9% ± 30.6 (p = 0.0001). These patients also had a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval 55 vs 41% (p = 0.0016), live birth rate per retrieval 42 vs 34% (p = 0.04) and with no significant difference in multiple gestations or OHSS. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates and live birth per retrieval was detected in patients undergoing curetting. These patients had more embryos frozen, leading to more transfers and more successful pregnancies.
PURPOSE: Follicular curetting is the gentle and rapidly rotating movement of the aspiration needle in a clockwise and counterclockwise fashion. The aim of our study is to assess this retrieval technique comparing cycle and pregnancy outcomes between curetting and non-curetting. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 817 patients that underwent oocyte retrieval at our fertility center from January 1st, 2016 until August 31st, 2019. All patients enrolled in the study underwent standard ovarian stimulation protocols. Three physicians routinely utilized follicle curetting during oocyte retrieval, while a fourth physician did not curette. Retrievals and embryo transfers were performed based on a rotating physician schedule. RESULTS: Retrievals that were performed using a curetting technique had a significantly higher number of total oocytes retrieved 12.4 ± 8.1 vs 10.7 ± 7.5 (p = 0.01), and number of M2 oocytes retrieved 8.1 ± 6.4 vs 6.9 ± 6.0 (p = 0.03), resulting in an increased M2 oocyte yield 63.7% ± 41.3 vs 50.9% ± 30.6 (p = 0.0001). These patients also had a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval 55 vs 41% (p = 0.0016), live birth rate per retrieval 42 vs 34% (p = 0.04) and with no significant difference in multiple gestations or OHSS. CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates and live birth per retrieval was detected in patients undergoing curetting. These patients had more embryos frozen, leading to more transfers and more successful pregnancies.
Authors: Stephanie K Dahl; Sara Cannon; Mira Aubuchon; Daniel B Williams; Jared C Robins; Michael A Thomas Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: A S Kohl Schwartz; I Calzaferri; M Roumet; A Limacher; A Fink; A Wueest; S Weidlinger; V R Mitter; B Leeners; M Von Wolff Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 6.918