| Literature DB >> 36065443 |
Zara Nomentsoa Razafiarimanga1, Yves Boris Kouakou Yao2, Minoarison Rajerison3, Lovarintsoa Judicael Randriamampianina1, Soanandrasana Rahelinirina3, Radolalaina Rakotoarison3, Bastaraud Alexandra4, Hariniaina Elisoa5, Handshumacher Pascal6, Jambou Ronan2,7.
Abstract
The deprived area of the Metzinger Valley in the city of Mahajanga has many healthcare concerns due to repeated flooding during the rainy season. Improving this health situation requires a better knowledge of the pathogens present in this area and of the risk factors favoring their propagation. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the household socioeconomic status and the presence of parasites in the faeces of children between 1 and 10 years of age in order to determine the risk factors for intestinal parasitosis. The study included 746 children, of whom 30% were infected with parasites. Entamoeba coli, a good indicator of environmental fecal contamination, was the most prevalent parasite with an observation frequency of 16.7% followed by Giardia lamblia with a prevalence of 10%. For helminths, Trichuris and Ascaris were the most prevalent respectively 5.4% and 1.8%. A large heterogeneity in the prevalence of parasites was observed from one neighborhood to another. However, multivariate analysis showed that these differences were not related to environmental factors or household structure, but rather to the economic level of the family, the education level of the mother as well as the age of the child. For example, the prevalence of Giardia decreased from 23.5% to 8% for children of mothers with little education to those with higher education, respectively. For E. coli, the prevalence is higher among poor households and school-aged children. In the frame of IRCOD project, mothers are being sensitized to hygiene and risk factors for transmission by intestinal parasites and the present study proposes a multidimensional approach as an assessment tool.Entities:
Keywords: Children; Helminth; Madagascar; Protozoa; Suburb
Year: 2022 PMID: 36065443 PMCID: PMC9440058 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2022.e00267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control ISSN: 2405-6731
Fig. 1A-B-C) views of the suburbs around the Metzinger channel. D) Map of Mahajunga with in blue the channel.
Fig. 2(A) Map of the suburbs of Mahajunga. (B) Map of the water collection network of the town and the name of the suburbs
Variables investigated during the study.
| Variables selected for the model | Type de variable |
|---|---|
| Variables selected for the model | Type de variable |
| Gender | boolean / male reference (OD = 1) |
| Age | quantitative discrete |
| Class of age | discrete |
| Educational level of the mother | boolean / “no education” reference (OD = 1) |
| primary | boolean / “no education” reference (OD = 1) |
| secondary | boolean / “no education” reference (OD = 1) |
| high school | boolean / “no education” reference (OD = 1) |
| Quarter (Fokontany) | boolean / “Manga” reference (OD = 1) or “other” |
| weekly budget for food | quantitative continuous (logarythl) |
| Latrine in the household | boolean / “no latrine” reference (OD = 1) |
| Nbr of Inhabitants per room | quantitative continuous |
| Weekly nbr of meals with meat | quantitative continuous |
| poorness | boolean / “lower quintile of reachness” reference (OD = 1) |
| Treatment of water | boolean / “no treatment” reference (OD = 1) |
Description of the population studied (variable distribution with the number of persons or household presenting each parameter).
| Family description | Modalities | Number (%) | Household description | Modalities | Number (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educational level (Mother) | No education | 182 (24.4%) | Source of water | standpipe | 549 (73.6%) |
| Primary | 4 (0.54%) | tap | 182 (24.4%) | ||
| Secondary | 466 (62.4%) | bottle | 5 (0.67%) | ||
| High school | 53 (7.1%) | tap + bottle | 2 (0.27%) | ||
| missing data | 41 (5.5%) | well | 3 (0.4%) | ||
| Mother employment | Artisan | 27 (3.6%) | standpipe + bottle | 4 (0.54%) | |
| merchant | 97 (13%) | missing data | 1 (0.13%) | ||
| farmer | 12 (1.6%) | Treatment of water | boiling | 1 (0.13%) | |
| at home | 385 (51.6%) | nothing | 505 (67.69%) | ||
| teacher | 14 (1.9%) | don't know | 2 (0.27%) | ||
| hotel | 26 (3.5%) | some time | 116 (15.55%) | ||
| student | 2 (0.27%) | often | 120 (16.1%) | ||
| trader | 16 (2.14%) | missing data | 2 (0.27%) | ||
| employee | 18 (2.4%) | ||||
| retired | 1 (0.13%) | Type of heater | wood | 46 (6.17%) | |
| nurse | 3 (0.4%) | wood + coal | 13 (1.74%) | ||
| missing data | 10 (1.34%) | coal | 660 (88.47%) | ||
| Father employment | Artisan | 152 (20.38%) | coal + Gaz | 13 (1.74%) | |
| merchant | 92 (12.33%) | electricity | 5 (0.67%) | ||
| grower | 18 (2.4%) | electricity + coal | 1 (0.13%) | ||
| teacher | 9 (1.2%) | gas | 6 (0.8%) | ||
| pupil | 6 (0.8%) | missing data | 2 (0.27%) | ||
| hotel | 12 (1.6%) | Type of lighting | candle | 32 (4.3%) | |
| trader | 139 (18.6%) | electricity | 611 (81.9%) | ||
| fisherman | 72 (9.65%) | electricity and petrol | 3 (0.4%) | ||
| retired | 10 (1.34%) | petrol | 96 (12.9%) | ||
| employee | 89 (11.9%) | missing data | 4 (0.54%) | ||
| nurse | 3 (0.4%) | Type of walls | concrete | 89 (11.9%) | |
| missing data | 139 (18.6%) | concrete + metal sheet | 4 (0.53%) | ||
| Owning a TV | Yes | 549 (73.59%) | wood | 55 (7.37%) | |
| No | 194 (26.01%) | wood + metal sheet | 3 (0.4%) | ||
| missing data | 3 (0.4%) | cob | 12 (1.6%) | ||
| Owning a radio | Yes | 448 (60%) | brick | 1 (0.13%) | |
| No | 293 (39.28%) | concrete + brick | 42 (5.6%) | ||
| missing data | 5 (0.67%) | brick + metal sheet | 5 (0.67%) | ||
| Owning a cell phone | Yes | 627 (84%) | stone | 8 (1.07%) | |
| No | 117 (15.68%) | metal sheet | 526 (70.5%) | ||
| missing data | 2 (0.27%) | missing data | 1 (0.13%) | ||
| Owning a fridge | Yes | 104 (13.9%) | Type of floor | wood | 21 (2.82%) |
| No | 621 (83.24%) | tilling | 9 (1.2%) | ||
| missing data | 21 (2.8%) | Cement | 653 (87.5%) | ||
| Owning a car | Yes | 33 (4.4%) | bare ground | 62 (8.3%) | |
| No | 710 (95.17%) | missing data | 1 (0.13%) | ||
| missing data | 3 (0.4%) | Type of roof | concrete | 3 (0.4%) | |
| Owning a bicycle | Yes | 146 (19.57%) | wood | 3 (0.42%) | |
| No | 597 (80%) | straw | 75 (6.03%) | ||
| missing data | 3 (0.4%) | straw + metal sheet | 3 (0.40%) | ||
| Owning a moto | Yes | 83 (11.13%) | metal sheet | 652 (87%) | |
| No | 661 (88.6%) | tiles | 9 (87.4%) | ||
| missing data | 2 (0.27%) | missing data | 1 (0.13%) | ||
| inhouse shower | Yes | 675 (90.5%) | Inhouse sanitation | Yes | 618 (82.8%) |
| No | 68 (9.12%) | No | 125 (16.7%) | ||
| missing data | 3 (0.4%) | missing data | 3 (0.4%) |
Fig. 3A) parasite carriage (frequency) in the different suburbs of the town, according to the gender of the child. B) parasite carriage (frequency) in the different suburbs of the town, according to the age of the child. C) helminths and protozoan carriage (frequency) in the different suburbs of the town. D) quintile richness repartition of the households in the different suburbs.
Logistic regression analysis of the risk (OD) of parasite carriage associated with each factor.
| Odds Ratio | Std. Err. | z | P-value | [95% Conf. | Interval] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habperpiece | 1.0732 | 0.0568 | 1.34 | 0.182 | 0.9675 | 1.1906 |
| Age | 1.9009 | 0.4849 | 2.52 | |||
| class of age | 0.9423 | 0.0218 | −2.56 | 0.9004 | 0.9861 | |
| poorness | 1.9739 | 0.5249 | 2.56 | |||
| quarter other than “Manga” | 2.7147 | 2.0052 | 1.35 | 0.176 | 0.6382 | 11.5468 |
| Constant | 0.0049 | 0.0050 | −5.21 | 0.0007 | 0.0361 | |
| quarter other than “Manga” | 0.5268 | 0.2507 | −1.35 | 0.178 | 0.2072 | 1.3391 |
| class of age | 1.0135 | 0.0047 | 2.91 | |||
| primary | 0.4198 | 0.2090 | −1.74 | 0.081 | 0.1582 | 1.1138 |
| secondary | 0.2547 | 0.1202 | −2.90 | 0.1010 | 0.6423 | |
| high school | 0.2682 | 0.1963 | −1.80 | 0.072 | 0.0639 | 1.1261 |
| Constante | 0.2466 | 0.1585 | −2.18 | 0.0700 | 0.8688 | |
| food budget | 0.6795 | 0.1910 | −1.37 | 0.169 | 0.3917 | 1.1787 |
| quarter other than “Manga” | 0.3977 | 0.2119 | −1.73 | 0.084 | 0.1399 | 1.1303 |
| class of age | 1.0176 | 0.0054 | 3.27 | 1.0070 | 1.0282 | |
| primary | 0.4325 | 0.2500 | −1.45 | 0.147 | 0.1393 | 1.3429 |
| secondary | 0.2842 | 0.1571 | −2.28 | 0.0962 | 0.8395 | |
| high school | 0.2826 | 0.2495 | −1.43 | 0.152 | 0.0501 | 1.5951 |
| Constant | 4.8240 | 12.1528 | 0.62 | 0.532 | 0.0346 | 672.6576 |
| secondary | 0.5618 | 0.1699 | −1.91 | 0.057 | 0.3105 | 1.0163 |
| water treatment | 0.5825 | 0.2162 | −1.46 | 0.145 | 0.2814 | 1.2056 |
| class of age | 1.0136 | 0.0048 | 2.82 | 1.0041 | 1.0231 | |
| poorness | 2.1871 | 0.6763 | 2.53 | |||
| Constant | 0.0453 | 0.0172 | −8.14 | 0.0215 | 0.0954 |