| Literature DB >> 36065208 |
Abstract
The terms single and singlehood conflate marital (e.g. divorced, widowed, and never married) and relationship (e.g. partnered or not) statuses, complicating researchers' understandings of their unique impact on women's lives. Despite qualitative research demonstrating unmarried and unpartnered statuses have distinct implications for women's sexual socialization, little quantitative research has explored these differences. To address this gap, the current project surveyed 506 unmarried Black women (M age = 33.02) to explore how common singlehood experiences (dating, motherhood, and intimate partner violence [IPV]) moderated associations between respondents' media use (television, social media, movies, and magazines) and relationship beliefs. This project focused on Black women because of their high rates of unmarried status and the pervasiveness of media stereotypes of their singlehood. Hierarchical linear regressions and the PROCESS model were used to test two-way interactions of media and singlehood experiences. Ecological systems and cultivation theories guided analyses. Across the dependent variables, media types were differentially associated with measures of relationship beliefs and these associations were differentially moderated by singlehood experiences. Weekly television was the most consistent predictor of relationship beliefs and experience with IPV was the most consistent moderator of associations. Women without partners, children, or experiences of IPV exhibited significant associations between media and relationship beliefs while their more experienced peers did not, suggesting singlehood experiences and media work together to shape unmarried Black women's sexual socialization, though more work is needed to determine how. Results illuminated key differences between groups of unmarried Black women, complicating current understandings of single status and challenging how singlehood is conceptualized in sexual socialization research.Entities:
Keywords: Black women; Cultivation theory; Ecological systems theory; Intimate partner violence; Media; Motherhood; Sexual socialization; Singlehood
Year: 2022 PMID: 36065208 PMCID: PMC9434064 DOI: 10.1007/s11199-022-01316-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sex Roles ISSN: 0360-0025
Descriptive Statistics and Inter-Correlations for All Study Variables
| Variable | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | 12. | 13. | 14. | 15. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.02 | 6.06 | 3.09 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.41 | 40.22 | 41.63 | 1.70 | 0.46 | 3.63 | 3.50 | 2.02 | 2.58 | 2.82 | |
| 5.91 | 1.86 | 1.12 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 20.91 | 24.80 | 1.45 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.11 | 0.55 | 0.72 | |
| Range | 25–45 | 2–10 | 1–6 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0–84 | 0–84 | 0–5 | 0–5 | 1–6 | 1–6 | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–5 |
| 1. Age | -- | .12** | –.01 | –.14** | .16** | .04 | .06 | –.14** | –.13** | .16** | –.04 | –.04 | –.07 | –.04 | –.20** |
| 2. Education | -- | .01 | -.09 | –.23** | –.09* | –.16** | –.19** | –.14** | –.02 | –.13** | –.12** | –.25** | –.07 | .22** | |
| 3. Religiosity | -- | .05 | .04 | -.01 | –.06 | .09 | .02 | .05 | .03 | –.02 | .14** | .10* | .06 | ||
| 4. Dating | -- | .13** | .11* | .01 | .11* | .04 | –.07 | .04 | .02 | .03 | –.06 | –.05 | |||
| 5. Motherhood | -- | 30** | –.04 | .06 | .04 | .05 | .15** | .10* | .03 | –.08 | –.18** | ||||
| 6. IPV | -- | .00 | .05 | .12** | .00 | .11* | .06 | –.04 | –.06 | –.10* | |||||
| 7. Weekly TV | -- | 31** | .23** | .16** | .14** | .16** | .09 | .07 | –.04 | ||||||
| 8. Weekly Social Media | -- | .15** | .04 | .19** | .10* | .09* | .04 | .06 | |||||||
| 9. Weekly Movies | -- | .22** | –.01 | .02 | .02 | –.08 | .06 | ||||||||
| 10. Weekly Magazines | -- | .04 | .03 | .10* | .10* | .04 | |||||||||
| 11. Antagonistic Beliefs about Black Relationships | -- | .62** | .09 | .24** | .11* | ||||||||||
| 12. Heterosexual Script Endorsement | -- | .02 | .36** | .18** | |||||||||||
| 13. Tolerance for Violence in Relationships | -- | .19** | –.06 | ||||||||||||
| 14. Single Stigma | -- | .41** | |||||||||||||
| 15. Perceived Pressure for Relationships | -- | ||||||||||||||
*p < .05; **p < .01
Hierarchical Linear Regression Analyses with Dating Status as the Moderator of Relationship Beliefs
| Antagonistic Beliefs about Black Relationships | Heterosexual Script Endorsement | Tolerance for Violence in Relationships | Singlehood Stigma | Perceived Pressure for Relationships | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | β | β | β | β | β | |||||
| Step 1 | .04** | .03* | .08** | .02 | .10** | |||||
| Age | –.07 | –.08 | –.08 | –.08 | –.18** | |||||
| Education | –.07 | –.08 | –.22** | –.10 | .23** | |||||
| Religiosity | .01 | –.03 | .11* | .08 | .05 | |||||
| Motherhood | .12* | –.09 | .01 | –.08 | –.10 | |||||
| IPV | .08 | .05 | –.04 | .01 | –.01 | |||||
| Step 2 | .09** | .06* | .10 | .06** | .11 | |||||
| Dating | –.01 | –.03 | .02 | –.07 | –.04 | |||||
| Weekly TV | .10* | .12* | .03 | .09 | –.03 | |||||
| Weekly Social Media | .14** | .05 | .05 | .01 | .07 | |||||
| Weekly Movies | –.11* | –.05 | –.04 | –.16** | .04 | |||||
| Weekly Magazines | .08 | .06 | .11* | .13** | .07 | |||||
| Step 3 | .09 | .06 | .10 | .05 | .13 | |||||
| Dating x TV | .02 | –.02 | –.05 | –.02 | .00 | |||||
| Dating x Social | –.06 | .06 | .02 | –.04 | –.01 | |||||
| Dating x Movies | –.03 | –.09 | .00 | –.08 | –.14** | |||||
| Dating x Magazines | .02 | .02 | .07 | .12* | .06 | |||||
Betas reported from the last block of the regression model. Relationship status coded 0 = not dating, no partners, 1 = dating, one or more partners. Motherhood coded 0 = childless, 1 = mother. Past IPV coded 0 = no IPV, 1 = IPV. Education coded 1 = none, 4 = high school, 6 = associate’s degree, 8 = 4-year college degree, or 10 = doctoral degree
*= p < .05; **= p < .01
Hierarchical Linear Regression Analyses with Motherhood Status as the Moderator of Relationship Beliefs
| Antagonistic Beliefs about Black Relationships | Heterosexual Script Endorsement | Tolerance for Violence in Relationships | Singlehood Stigma | Perceived Pressure for Relationships | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | β | β | β | β | β | |||||
| Step 1 | .03* | .02 | .08** | .02 | .10** | |||||
| Age | –.07 | –.09 | –.09 | –.08 | –.19** | |||||
| Education | –.08 | –.09 | –.22** | –.11* | .23** | |||||
| Religiosity | .01 | –.03 | .12** | .08 | .04 | |||||
| Dating | .00 | –.03 | .03 | –.07 | –.03 | |||||
| IPV | .08 | .05 | –.05 | .00 | –.02 | |||||
| Step 2 | .09** | .06* | .10 | .07** | .11 | |||||
| Motherhood | .11* | .10 | .01 | –.09 | –.10* | |||||
| Weekly TV | .09 | .13* | .03 | .08 | –.02 | |||||
| Weekly Social Media | .14** | .04 | .04 | .01 | .07 | |||||
| Weekly Movies | –.11** | –.07 | –.03 | –.16** | .04 | |||||
| Weekly Magazines | .08 | .06 | .11* | .12* | .06 | |||||
| Step 3 | .11* | .08* | .10 | .08 | .14* | |||||
| Motherhood x TV | .02 | .06 | –.04 | .09 | .14** | |||||
| Motherhood x Social | –.14** | –.15** | –.01 | –.09 | .00 | |||||
| Motherhood x Movies | –.02 | –.05 | .06 | –.05 | –.11* | |||||
| Motherhood x Magazines | .07 | .00 | .02 | –.03 | .03 | |||||
Betas reported from the last block of the regression model. Relationship status coded 0 = not dating, no partners, 1 = dating, one or more partners. Motherhood coded 0 = childless, 1 = mother. Past IPV coded 0 = no IPV, 1 = IPV. Education coded 1 = none, 4 = high school, 6 = associate’s degree, 8 = 4-year college degree, or 10 = doctoral degree
*= p < .05; **= p < .01
Hierarchical Linear Regression Analyses with Experience of Intimate Partner Violence as the Moderator of Relationship Beliefs
| Antagonistic Beliefs about Black Relationships | Heterosexual Script Endorsement | Tolerance for Violence in Relationships | Singlehood Stigma | Perceived Pressure for Relationships | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | β | β | β | β | β | |||||
| Step 1 | .04** | .03* | .08** | .03* | .09* | |||||
| Age | –.06 | –.08 | –.08 | –.07 | –.18** | |||||
| Education | –.08 | –.08 | –.21** | –.10 | .22** | |||||
| Religiosity | .00 | –.03 | .13** | .08 | .05 | |||||
| Dating | .00 | –.02 | .02 | –.06 | –.02 | |||||
| Motherhood | .11* | .09 | .01 | –.09 | –.10 | |||||
| Step 2 | .09 | .06* | .10 | .06** | .09 | |||||
| IPV | .08 | .05 | –.05 | –.01 | –.02 | |||||
| Weekly TV | .09 | .12* | .02 | .09 | –.02 | |||||
| Weekly Social Media | .15** | .04 | .04 | .02 | .07 | |||||
| Weekly Movies | –.08 | –.05 | –.02 | –.15** | .04 | |||||
| Weekly Magazines | .07 | –.05 | .09 | .11* | .05 | |||||
| Step 3 | .11* | .07 | .12* | .09 | .13* | |||||
| IPV x TV | .04 | .03 | .04 | –.06 | –.04 | |||||
| IPV x Social | –.10* | –.09 | .07 | –.11* | –.12* | |||||
| IPV x Movies | –.10* | –.10* | –.10* | –.02 | –.02 | |||||
| IPV x Magazines | .03 | .03 | –.10* | –.02 | .02 | |||||
Betas reported from the last block of the regression model. Relationship status coded 0 = not dating, no partners, 1 = dating, one or more partners. Motherhood coded 0 = childless, 1 = mother. Past IPV coded 0 = no IPV, 1 = IPV. Education coded 1 = none, 4 = high school, 6 = associate’s degree, 8 = 4-year college degree, or 10 = doctoral degree
*p < .05; **p < .01
Fig. 1Plots of Simple Slopes for Dating Status as Moderator
Fig. 2Plots of Simple Slopes for Motherhood Status as Moderator
Fig. 3Plots of Simple Slopes for Intimate Partner Violence Status as Moderator