| Literature DB >> 36065169 |
Yuan Lu1.
Abstract
Primarily based on theoretical studies of multicultural pedagogy, anthropology of music, and postmodern music education concepts, techniques combining qualitative and quantitative research are used. Eight types of design guidelines are then proposed according to different intelligence characteristics, according to intelligence characteristics and context of conversational design. Finally, based on the perspective of multicultural learning environments, this work will explore and provide insights into new concepts of piano teaching in multicultural learning environments in three areas: new piano teaching, new instruction, and new piano learning materials. The experimental results show that piano teaching activities based on multiple intelligences theory can stimulate students' interest in learning music, fully mobilize students' initiative in learning music, and improve the quality of music teaching.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36065169 PMCID: PMC9440823 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7044904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Musical education.
Whether the music of all nationalities in the world (including Western Art Music) equally important.
| Number of people | Proportion | Option |
|---|---|---|
| 101 | 55.7 | Agree |
| 48 | 27.3 | Disagree |
| 23 | 12.3 | Agree |
| 3 | 1.7 | Disagree |
Figure 2Whether learning world music conducive to the formation of an attitude of equality and respect.
Figure 3Students' love of minority music.
Figure 4Reasons for liking minority music.
Figure 5Understanding of world music (except Western Art Music).
Figure 6Understanding of world music.
Comparison of pretest differences of intelligence between experimental class and control class.
| Intelligent type | Class |
|
|
|
|
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language intelligence | Experimental class | 48 | 15.67 | 2.15 | 0.672 | 0.503 | X |
| Control class | 48 | 13.00 | 7.27 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Logical digital intelligence | Experimental class | 48 | 14.25 | 6.98 | 0.394 | 0.694 | X |
| Control class | 48 | 13.35 | 4.48 | ||||
Comparison of intelligence posttest differences between experimental class and control class.
| Intelligent type | Class |
|
|
|
|
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language intelligence | Experimental class | 48 | 16.04 | 4.51 | 2.178 | 0.032 |
|
| Control class | 48 | 14.08 | 4.40 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Logical digital intelligence | Experimental class | 48 | 15.98 | 4.99 | 0.661 | 0.510 | X |
| Control class | 48 | 15.25 | 5.98 | ||||
0.05). It showed that, after the experiment, some intelligence of students in the experimental class had been effectively developed and significantly changed; especially the physical kinesthetic intelligence, musical intelligence, and self-cognitive intelligence of students in the experimental class had been significantly improved (P < 0.01). Therefore, it is concluded that the application of multiple intelligences theory in music situational teaching in junior middle school is effective in cultivating students' multiple intelligences.
Comparison of pretest and posttest differences of intelligence of students in the control class.
| Intelligent type | Class |
|
|
|
|
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical intelligence | After the experiment | 48 | 14.25 | 4.98 | 0.125 | 0.235 | |
| Spatial intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 18.34 | 7.40 | −0.251 | 0.601 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 18.17 | 5.68 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Body kinesthetic intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 13.70 | 3.92 | 0.730 | 0.421 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 13.18 | 5.17 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Musical intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 13.54 | 6.45 | −1.006 | 0.217 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 14.47 | 4.11 | ||||
Comparison of pretest and posttest differences of students' intelligence in experimental class.
| Intelligent type | Before and after the experiment |
|
|
|
|
| Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Language intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 12.67 | 5.05 | −2.018 | 0.043 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 14.04 | 6.51 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Logical digital intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 15.68 | 4.74 | −1.247 | 0.218 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 14.20 | 5.99 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Spatial intelligence | Before experiment | 48 | 20.25 | 2.08 | −2.06 | 0.042 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 21.34 | 2.74 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Body | Before experiment | 48 | 14.80 | 7.10 | −2.537 | 0.001 |
|
Comparison of pretest differences of piano scores between experimental class and control class.
| Class |
|
|
|
|
| Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Experimental class | 48 | 58.41 | 19.95 | 1.65 | 0.657 |
|
| Control class | 48 | 58.23 | 18.26 |
Comparison of posttest differences of piano scores between experimental class and control class.
| Class |
|
|
|
|
| Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Experimental class | 48 | 56.48 | 16.50 | 2.025 | 0.024 |
|
| Control class | 48 | 59.35 | 16.15 |
Comparison of pretest and posttest differences in music scores of students in the control class.
| Before and after the experiment |
|
|
|
|
| Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Before experiment | 48 | 58.51 | 18.21 | −0.271 | 0.675 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 59.23 | 16.14 |
Comparison of pretest and posttest differences in music scores of students in experimental class.
| Before and after the experiment |
|
|
|
|
| Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Before experiment | 48 | 59.14 | 19.95 | −2.511 | 0.012 |
|
| After the experiment | 48 | 68.56 | 18.61 |