| Literature DB >> 36064753 |
Gianluca Piovan1, Luca Farinelli2, Daniele Screpis1, Stefania Marocco3, Leonardo Motta3, Giuseppe Palazzolo4, Simone Natali5, Claudio Zorzi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) vs. debridement antibiotic bead and retention of the implant (DABRI) in terms of infection-free success rate and treatment cost for acute periprosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Entities:
Keywords: Absorbable beads; Antibiotic; Implant retention; Knee; Periprosthetic joint infection
Year: 2022 PMID: 36064753 PMCID: PMC9446807 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00139-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthroplasty ISSN: 2524-7948
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study. PJI: Prosthetic Joint Infections; MSIS: Musculoskeletal Infection Society; DAIR: Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention; DABRI: Debridement, antibiotics bead and retention implant; CR: cruciate-retaining; PS: posterior-stabilized; Uni: unicompartmental; IV: intravenous
Demographics and surgical details of 32 patients
| DAIR group's data ( | DABRI group's data ( | Statistical data | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD) | 69.1 (11.4) | 64.2 (8.7) | 0.816 |
| Male, | 7 (47%) | 10 (59%) | 0.492 |
| BMI, mean (SD) | 30.6 (3.2) | 30.9 (3.9) | 0.658 |
| Diabetes, | 2 (13%) | 4 (24%) | 0.461 |
| Liver disease, | 0 (0%) | 2 (12%) | 0.401 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 2 (13%) | 2 (12%) | 0.893 |
| Smoking, | 1 (7%) | 2 (12%) | 0.621 |
| Alcohol abuse, | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | 0.615 |
| MSIS score | 4.5 (2.1) | 4.2 (1.8) | 0.876 |
| ASA classification | 2 (0.5) | 2.4 (0.5) | 0.723 |
| Failed case, | 3 | 2 | 0.522 |
| Acute hematogenous, | 3 | 5 | 0.539 |
| Acute post-operative, | 12 | 12 |
DAIR debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, DABRI debridement antibiotic pearls and retention of the implant, n.s. not significant, SD standard deviation, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, PJI periprosthetic joint infection, MSIS Musculoskeletal Infection Society.
Clinical results of 32 patients
| DAIR group ( | DABRI group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up (month) | |||
| Mean | 30.2 | 16.1 | 0.001 |
| SD | 13.7 | 8.1 | |
| Range | 12–49 | 12–37 | |
| Success rate, | 12 (80%) | 15 (88%) | 0.522 |
| Cost based on NHS, €, mean (SD) | 19774 (6424) | 22363 (9150) | 0.923 |
| Length of hospital stay, day, mean (SD) | 18.4 (6.0) | 21.4 (8.3) | 0.712 |
SD standard deviation, NHS National Health System (Italy)
Two-weeks after systemic antibiotic therapies in DAIR group (n=15)
| Antibiotics | |
|---|---|
| Co-trimox + rifampicin | 1 |
| Teicoplanin + third-generation cephalosporins + rifampicin | 6 |
| Beta-lactam antibiotics | 2 |
| Beta-lactam antibiotics + fluoroquinolones | 3 |
| Beta-lactam antibiotics +rifampicin | 3 |
Co-trimox, trimethoprim / sulfamethoxazole
Two-weeks after systemic antibiotic therapies in DABRI group (n=17)
| Antibiotics | |
|---|---|
| Teicoplanin / vancomycin + third-generation cephalosporins | 9 |
| Teicoplanin / vancomycin + third-generation cephalosporins + rifampicin | 6 |
| Beta-lactam antibiotics | 2 |
C-reactive protein variations in 32 patients
| CRP | DAIR | DABRI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 day | 121.2 (55.9) mg/dL | 130.6 (65.4) mg/dL | 0.342 |
| 14th day | 45.2 (39.9) mg/dL | 30.67 (18.0) mg/dL | 0.418 |
| 30th day | 19.4 (12.4) mg/dL | 11.69 (6.9) mg/dL | 0.835 |
| 60th day | 7.7 (7.3) mg/dL | 7.38 (4.1) mg/dL | 0.547 |
CRP C-reactive protein; data are shown as mean (standard deviation).
Fig. 2C-reactive protein (CRP) variations over time in DAIR and DABRI groups
Microorganisms isolated from 32 patients
| Isolated microorganisms | DAIR | DABRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gram-positive | ||
| | ||
| CoN | 5 | 6 |
| Methicillin-sensitive | 2 | 1 |
| Others | ||
| | 1 | 2 |
| | 1 | 1 |
| | 1 | 1 |
| Gram-negative | ||
| | ||
| | 1 | 1 |
| | 0 | 1 |
| | 1 | 1 |
| Polymicrobical | 0 | 1 |
| Negative Culture | 3 | 2 |
CoN Coagulase-Negative, spp. species plural