| Literature DB >> 36064419 |
Hongyu Wang1, Jiaming Wan2, Kailong Geng1, Xiangnan Zhang3, Ruixing Hou4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The occurrence of nonunion after tibial fracture surgery is mainly related to insufficient blood supply. Therefore, anatomical study of the internal and external tibial artery is very important, but there is no good method for displaying the intraosseous artery clearly and intuitively. This hinders the protection and reconstruction of it by surgeons, as well as the development of new instruments and techniques by researchers.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Corrosion; Perfusion; Tibia
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36064419 PMCID: PMC9447338 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03302-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.677
Fig. 1Perfusion and anatomy of the tibia. a Calf specimen. b Popliteal artery catheterization. c Preliminary removal of soft tissue
Fig. 2Corrosion process. a External fixation bracket. b–e 1st–4th acid corrosion. f–j Exposure of nutrient arteries. k–o Vascular branches viewed under microscope (10 ×)
Fig. 3a The red arrow is the foramen of the nutrient artery. b Resin mold
Fig. 4Transparent tibia. a Rear view. b Side view. c Front view. d 3D model
Fig. 5Vascular casting. a Rear view. b Side view. c Front view
Angle of nutrient artery and location of the nutrient foramen (°, cm, n = 10)
| Tibia label | Angle of nutrient artery | Actual position of nutrient foramen | Relative position of nutrient foramen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superior distance | Inferior distance | |||
| 01 | 68.79 | 5.85 | 9.31 | 38.60% |
| 02 | 33.60 | 5.58 | 8.30 | 40.21% |
| 03 | 75.52 | 7.12 | 9.03 | 44.07% |
| 04 | 85.79 | 6.42 | 9.27 | 40.92% |
| 05 | 57.17 | 6.48 | 9.15 | 41.45% |
| 06 | 63.29 | 6.30 | 9.07 | 40.99% |
| 07 | 28.51 | 6.63 | 7.98 | 45.36% |
| 08 | 37.11 | 5.64 | 8.18 | 40.80% |
| 09 | 51.80 | 6.13 | 9.61 | 38.95% |
| 10 | 24.15 | 5.67 | 8.97 | 38.74% |
| Max | 85.79 | 45.36% | ||
| Min | 24.15 | 38.60% | ||
| x ± s | 52.57 ± 21.12 | 41.01% ± 2.22% | ||
Superior distance, distance between the nutrient foramen and the epiphyseal plate above the tibia; Inferior distance, distance between the nutrient foramen and the epiphyseal plate below the tibia; Relative position of nutrient foramen, Superior distance/(Superior distance + Inferior distance); x ± s, mean ± the standard deviation
Fig. 6Morphology of internal and external tibial arteries. a The red area is the distribution range of the nutrient foramen, the blue arrow is the popliteal artery, the red arrow is the posterior tibial artery, and the green arrow is the nutrient artery. b The green arrow is the nutrient foramen, the red arrow is the medullary artery trunk, the blue arrow is the big branch, and the yellow arrow is the small branch
Lengths and diameters of arteries (mm, n = 10)
| Parameters | Maximum | Minimum | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trunk length of the nutrient artery | 6.90 | 3.20 | 5.22 ± 1.34 |
| Diameter of the initial segment of the nutrient artery | 1.80 | 1.00 | 1.29 ± 0.21 |
| Diameter of the osseous segment of the nutrient artery | 1.14 | 0.60 | 0.79 ± 0.18 |
| Diameter of the inferior segment branches of the posterior tibial artery | 1.80 | 0.52 | 1.07 ± 0.39 |