Literature DB >> 36063349

Autonomic Testing Optimizes Therapy for Heart Failure and Related Cardiovascular Disorders.

Nicholas L DePace1,2, Joe Colombo3, Kaushik Mandal4, Howard J Eisen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular autonomic control is an intricately balanced dynamic process. Autonomic dysfunction, regardless of origin, promotes and sustains the disease processes, including in patients with heart failure (HF). Autonomic control is mediated through the two autonomic branches: parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S). HF is arguably the disease that stands to most benefit from P&S manipulation to reduce mortality risk. This review article briefly summarizes some of the more common types of autonomic dysfunction (AD) that are found in heart failure, suggests a mechanism by which AD may contribute to HF, reviews AD involvement in common HF co-morbidities (e.g., ventricular arrhythmias, AFib, hypertension, and Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy), and summarizes possible therapy options for treating AD in HF. RECENT
FINDINGS: Autonomic assessment is important in diagnosing and treating CHF, and its possible co-morbidities. Autonomic assessment may also have importance in predicting which patients may be susceptible to sudden cardiac death. This is important since most CHF patients with sudden cardiac death have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and better discriminators are needed. Many life-threatening cardiovascular disorders will require invasive testing for precise diagnoses and therapy planning when modulating the ANS is important. In cases of non-life-threatening disorders, non-invasive ANS testing techniques, especially those that individually assess both ANS branches simultaneously and independently, are sufficient to diagnose and treat serially.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomic neuropathy; Cardiovascular disease; Heart failure; Parasympathetic; Quality of life; Sympathetic

Year:  2022        PMID: 36063349      PMCID: PMC9442559          DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01781-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   3.955


Introduction

Cardiovascular autonomic control is an intricately balanced, dynamic process. Autonomic dysfunction (AD, an imbalance between the parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S) nervous systems), either as a result of primary disorders of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) or secondary maladaptive P&S responses, as seen in patients with heart failure (HF), promotes and sustain disease processes. HF is arguably the disease that stands to most benefit from P&S manipulation to reduce mortality risk. AD results when the P&S are out of balance [1, 2]. This is the more common type of autonomic disorders. Most diseases and medications affect only one autonomic branch. However, P&S dysfunction is common [3]. Most types of AD are generally not life-threatening disorders, but significantly affect quality of life (QoL). Less common, but not rare, are the life-threatening forms of AD, such as cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) [4]. CAN is defined as very low PSNS-activity and indicates risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). CAN with high SNS-activity indicates high risk of MACE, including sudden cardiac death (SCD) [5, 6••, 7•]. Rare autonomic disorders are Synuclein disorders which affect the ANS, such as Parkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia, multi-system atrophy, and primary autonomic failure, which may not be immediately life threatening but can abbreviate life expectancy. Synucleinopathies refer to a group of disorders characterized by misfolded α-Synuclein protein aggregates in the peripheral and central nervous systems. These disorders require more sophisticated and complex autonomic testing and work-up. These rare disorders are not the subject of this review. By identifying AD, the goal is to normalize any objectively measured abnormalities (see Table 1) to restore the proper balance of PSNS- to SNS-activity in the body. There are four basic abnormalities. (1) Too much SNS-activity (see “↑SNS” in Table 1) promotes, high BP, provocation of tachy-arrhythmias, and worsening of HF. (2) Too much PSNS-activity (see “↑PSNS” in Table 1) predominantly promotes brady-arrhythmia, some forms of atrial fibrillation, hypotension, vagal syncope (parasympathetic and vagal are synonymous), and depression. Depression may predispose to coronary events. (3) Too little SNS-activity (see “↓SNS” in Table 1) especially upon standing predisposes to orthostatic drop in BP, or postural tachycardia, and orthostatic intolerance syndromes. (4) Very low PSNS-activity (see “↓↓PSNS” in Table 1) defines CAN and predisposes to MACE endpoints and SCD, and is the most serious form of AD, see Appendix Figure.
Table 1

Primary forms of autonomic dysfunction (AD) and their common presentations. See text for details

↑SNS

(SE)

↓SNS

(SW)

↑PSNS

(PE)

↓↓PSNS

(CAN)

• HTN• OH• VVS• normal process of aging
• Tachy-Arrhythmia• POTS• Hypotension• predisposes to MACE, including Stroke or SCD
• (some forms of AFib, VT/VF)• OIS• Depression
• worsening HF• some forms of AFib

↑SNS, high sympathetics, including sympathetic excess (SE); ↓SNS, low sympathetics, including sympathetic withdrawal (SW); ↑PSNS, high parasympathetics, including parasympathetic excess (SE); ↓↓PSNS, very low parasympathetic activity, including CAN (a resting parasympathetic insufficiency); AFib, atrial fibrillation; CAN, cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; HF, heart failure (including congestive HF); HTN, hypertension; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; OH, orthostatic hypotension; OIS, orthostatic intolerance syndrome; POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; VVS, vasovagal syndrome

Primary forms of autonomic dysfunction (AD) and their common presentations. See text for details ↑SNS (SE) ↓SNS (SW) ↑PSNS (PE) ↓↓PSNS (CAN) ↑SNS, high sympathetics, including sympathetic excess (SE); ↓SNS, low sympathetics, including sympathetic withdrawal (SW); ↑PSNS, high parasympathetics, including parasympathetic excess (SE); ↓↓PSNS, very low parasympathetic activity, including CAN (a resting parasympathetic insufficiency); AFib, atrial fibrillation; CAN, cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; HF, heart failure (including congestive HF); HTN, hypertension; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; OH, orthostatic hypotension; OIS, orthostatic intolerance syndrome; POTS, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; VVS, vasovagal syndrome In HF, AD may be involved early and if prolonged, may perhaps cause HF. For example, ↓SNS upon standing predisposes to orthostatic drop in BP upon standing due to insufficient vasoconstriction (an alpha-adrenergic response; adrenergic and sympathetic are synonymous). Prolonged ↓SNS upon standing may lead to poor cardiac perfusion and decreased diastolic BP. Decreased diastolic BP may lead to poor cerebral perfusion and increased systolic BP with ↑SNS (a beta-adrenergic response, releasing adrenaline to stimulate the heart). Decreased diastolic BP with increased systolic BP involves widened pulse pressure. Wide pulse pressure (> 80 mmHg) is an indication of HF. Relieving ↓SNS (abnormal the alpha-adrenergic response), especially early, may prevent HF, before the ↑SNS (abnormal beta-adrenergic response) becomes a mortality risk involving prolonged ↑SNS which may lead to hypertension, arrhythmia, and SCD (or other MACE, including HF). If within 3 months (it typically takes 3 months for the ANS to fully adapt to a new state, including titration of therapy), the patient’s ANS is not moving towards balance at rest and normalization of response to challenge, then the patient is not responding to therapy as desired and secondary or alternate therapy plans should be considered. Autonomic therapy must be gentle. Too much therapy often causes imbalance in the opposite direction and often causes additional symptoms. Simply titrating more therapy is not typically a satisfactory solution to the lack of intended response. Often patients are intolerant or desensitized to primary therapy. Retesting in 3 months enables individualizing therapy. Testing at this time also helps to encourage the patient since little change in symptoms often occurs by that time, for the ANS must fully adapt before the organs are stabilized, before symptoms change significantly. We explain it to our patients as “braking a bad habit and establishing a good habit” before symptoms are fully relieved.

Autonomic Dysfunction

AD is a part of the aging process. Disease, disorder, injury, etc., serve to accelerate AD. Later stages of AD include advanced autonomic dysfunction (AAD) or diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN, AAD with the effects of Diabetes) and CAN. AAD or DAN are measured as ↓PSNS or ↓SNS and indicate increased morbidity risk. CAN is measured as ↓↓PSNS and indicates increased mortality risk, including risk of MACE or SCD event, especially in cases of ↓↓PSNS with ↑SNS. For example, with ↓↓PSNS, there may not be sufficient PSNS-activity to prevent a sympathetically mediated (↑SNS) ventricular tachy-rhythm from becoming ventricular fibrillation. Sympatholytics (e.g., beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system blockers) help to limit ↑SNS to establish balance and help the parasympathetics to prevent the deleterious effects of ↑SNS). ↓↓PSNS and ↑SNS are not synonymous. For example, in older patients, ↓↓PSNS & ↓SNS may be normal and may not need significant therapy, as long as SB is within normal limits (CAN with low-normal SB: 0.4 < SB < 1.0, as recommended for older or chronic disease patients; SB recommended for younger patients is 1.0 < SB < 3.0 [3, 5, 6••]). Whereas, in most patients (especially younger patients), ↓↓PSNS & ↑SNS often does need significant therapy and is predictive of MACE. AD may result from many types of insults, including 1) significant one-time traumas (mental or physical), 2) long-standing chronic diseases or multiple, 3) repetitive smaller traumas, 4) severe infections (causing oxidative stress, including COVID-19), and 5) genetic disorders. All are treatable by restoring balance [8] (including long-COVID [9]). For some (e.g., the genetic disorder Ehlers Danlos Syndrome/Hypermobility), the treatment may be life-long to maintain quality of life and productivity, especially if there is no treatment for the underlying cause (as is the case for EDS/hypermobility). Otherwise, once proper balance (both at rest and in response to challenge) is established and stabilized, the nervous system will “remember” that state and often carry forward without therapy until some other clinical event happens.

Tests of Autonomic Dysfunction

Typical clinical tests of AD include tilt-table testing to test for syncope and orthostatic dysfunction, deep breathing, and Valsalva challenges to test PSNS and SNS responses, and sudomotor testing to test for peripheral autonomic neuropathy. The autonomic tests requiring radioactive agents and imaging are typically hospital- or research-based. All of these ANS tests test only one branch of the ANS or test both branches together and require assumption or approximation to theorize activity in each branch together. Cardio-respiratory monitoring (aka., P&S monitoring) tests both ANS branches independently and simultaneously and is reproducible, repeatable, and noninvasive. Measuring both ANS branches separately, but at the same time provides more information for serious cardiac diseases, such as HF, especially those predisposed to SCD, lethal ventricular arrhythmias, CHF, and CAN. Tests that focus solely on the autonomic effects on the sinus node (e.g., HR-variability, HR-Turbulence, and beat-to-beat BP measures) were not significant predictors of HF and other MACE [10]. This is well supported. To a limit (e.g., arrhythmia), more HR-variability indicates greater health. More variability indicates more PSNS-activity. Generally, a little more PSNS-activity is cardio-protective [11] and is associated with healthier patients [5]. However, a little more PSNS-activity cannot be measured with ANS tests, except cardio-respiratory monitoring [3]. HR-variability reflects sinus node activity. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia also reflects sinus node activity. Both are independent measures of autonomic activity, HR-variability from the heart and respiratory activity from the lungs. With these two independent, simultaneous measures of the ANS the two independent branches of the ANS are fully, mathematically characterized, eliminating assumption and approximation [12]. These two measurements are incorporated into cardio-respiratory (or P&S) monitoring. Tilt-table testing is a useful measure of vasomotor adrenergic (sympathetic) responses, usually used for unexplained syncope. Beat-to-beat BP and HR are assessed. A tilt duration of 5 min is sufficient to establish NOH. Evaluation of disorders of delayed orthostatic intolerance, including syncope, a longer duration of tilt is often necessary [13]. Sudomotor testing identifies small fiber disease (the small nerve fibers also include SNS-nerves) and peripheral autonomic neuropathy, often involved in generalized pain syndromes, poor wound healing, and thermoregulatory dysfunction. Sudomotor testing consists of two general types: 1) Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test (QSART) and 2) thermoregulatory sweat test [14].

Pharmacological Therapy

Treating cardiac disease with ↑SNS is more difficult due to its associated abundance of neurohormones. Neurohormones work to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis through increased volume expansion, peripheral vaso-arterial constriction, and increased myocardial contractility. An over-abundance of neurohormones may dysregulate P&S and CHF [15]. Pharmacologic agents relieve the deleterious effects of excessive sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system activation (↑SNS). However, this treatment corrects only some P&S imbalances, typically static or resting imbalances (e.g., CAN with ↑SNS). The remaining imbalances (typically dynamic imbalances, e.g., orthostatic dysfunction with ↓SNS) are disruptive and continue to contribute to HF pathophysiology, or require high dosing which does not correct the uncoupling of the P&S nervous systems. For example, with NOH, diastolic BP may drop below 60 mmHg causing cardiac hypo-perfusion. This coupled with high systolic BP, as compensation for the associated cerebral hypo-perfusion, may widen pulse pressure and underlie HF and coronary ischemia [16]. Wide pulse pressures [17] are adverse prognostic factors and may be due to dynamic P&S imbalances. Relieving ↓SNS may normalize pulse-pressure and resting BP [18]. Without ↓SNS as additional information, traditional sympatholytic therapy targeting reduction in systolic BP may exacerbate BP. Conversely, systolic BP may not respond to antihypertensive therapy if cardiac and cerebral hypo-perfusion persist. The hypertension may be secondary to, and compensatory for, cerebral hypo-perfusion and the associated lightheadedness upon standing. Autonomic interventions are extremely useful, the most established being β-adrenergic and renin-angiotensin blockers (beta-blockers, ACE-Is, and ARBs). However, pharmacology may not be sufficient to prevent progression and adverse outcomes, especially with cardiomyopathies. Midodrine (a vasoconstrictor and αSNS-agonist) has been used for patients with low BP and HR with reduced EF (HFrEF), who have been precluded from instituting β-blockers and renin-angiotensin system blockers. Midodrine raises BP so patients may tolerate conventional pharmacological therapy [19].

Non-pharmacological Therapy

Several experimental, autonomic modulation techniques maybe used for advanced HF management [20]: spinal cord stimulation, renal artery denervation, baroreceptor activation therapies (BAT), and left cardiac sympathetic denervation. Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is included for treatment of HF [21]. P&S imbalance (e.g., CAN with ↑SNS) is an integral component of the pathophysiology of HF. No mortality benefit was noted with VNS; however, VNS did improve their six-minute walk and QoL scores. The efficacy of VNS is mixed, indicating the need for better measures of PSNS-activity. This illustrates the complexity of the ANS, and the degree of modulation and specificity that may be necessary. The same complexity has been found with the other experimental, autonomic modulation techniques [15]. Another stimulator, BAT (which decreases SNS- and increases PSNS-activity), demonstrated improved QoL, 6-min walk, and NT-proBNP scores in HFrEF [22•]. This confirms that P&S modulation in systolic CHF patients improves QoL, exercise capacity, and biomarkers. This is extremely important because greater than 70% of patients with HFrEF are ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy [23].

Congestive Heart Failure and Sudden Cardiac Death

SCD may be due to CHF, a sudden ischemic event, or other chronic cardiac condition where P&S imbalance is present. It was believed that medications could prevent SCD, especially in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Now devices such as defibrillators may be more important in preventing SCD from advanced structural heart disease. Renal sympathetic denervation may have beneficial effect in CHF patients [24]: For HFrEF, these studies demonstrated improved symptoms and LVEF. For CHF with preserved LVEF, renal sympathetic denervation is associated with improved surrogate endpoints. Autonomic testing may provide more information to help improve the benefits of SNS-denervation. Most people have SCD, but do not have low LVEFs. Therefore, LVEF may not be a sensitive marker for SCD. It is hoped that P&S testing may describe additional information that may better discriminate those at risk for SCD and other MACE endpoints, specifically CAN with high SB (↑SNS at rest) [6••, 25]. A recent study of patients with chronic CHF [26] demonstrates that Splanchnic nerve block reduced exercise intolerance, and resting pulmonary artery and wedge pressures, produced favorable effects on cardiac output and exercise capacity. Splanchnic nerve block predominately reduces systolic function by preventing the sympathetically innervated splanchnic nervous system from being activated. This helps to redistribute blood volume centrally, into the thorax. The study concluded that targeting the splanchnic autonomic nervous system may present a potential therapeutic target not currently used in HF treatment. For severe heart disease, PSNS- or SNS-agents may improve management of chronic HF, arrhythmias, and hypertension [6••]. It is hoped that (1) identification of P&S abnormalities and (2) measures to improve these abnormalities, whether pharmacologic or interventional, may identify high-risk patients for SCD and enable the prevention of SCD. For example, ↑SNS may contribute to the pathogenesis of CHF [27] via downregulation of beta 1 receptors, exerting direct toxic effects on the myocardium, and contributing to myocardial remodeling and life-threatening arrhythmias. Beta-1 adrenergic blockers reduce morbidity and mortality in HF. Identification of CAN (↓↓PSNS), especially with ↑SNS, may identify a higher risk subset of patients, especially with low LVEFs, who may benefit from cardio-protective measures, such as defibrillators, to prevent SCD.

Implications of Autonomic Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Conditions

Ventricular Arrhythmias

CAN and ↑SNS are associated with the cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis of ventricular arrhythmias, especially in patients with myocardial ischemia. This may cause SCD. Novel autonomic neuromodulation may be beneficial for malignant ventricular arrhythmias [28]. SNS-activity increases just prior to the onset of ventricular tachy-arrhythmias [29], and ↑SNS indicates risk, given history. Cardiac baroreceptor stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, stellate ganglion modulation, electromagnetic fields, optogenetics, selective ablation of the ligament of marshal, cervical vagal nerve stimulation, transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation, and renal sympathetic denervation have all been tested to modulate the ANS to reduce ventricular arrhythmias. The outcome depends on the level of the cardiac neural axis in the patient’s intrinsic cardiac status [30]. Stellate ganglion blocks may be useful in treating ventricular tachycardia and ventricular storm in some subsets of patients [31]. Other ventricular tachycardia substrates or mid-myocardial intra-septal is not easily catheter treated with ablation. Left stellate ganglion block may be useful, particularly in some with advanced HF on life support [32]. Bilateral stellate ganglionectomy may significantly reduce the incidence of recurrent ventricular tachycardia and defibrillator shocks, independent of the cardiomyopathic substrate [33]. It resulted in a 10% decrease in ventricular tachycardia and shocks for patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysrhythmia [34] and has been effective in catecholamine polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and long QT [35].

Atrial Fibrillation

AFib in healthy hearts is usually associated with ↑PSNS. AFib in diseased hearts is usually associated with ↑SNS. However, this may not be that simple [36]. Low HR and ↓↓PSNS are associated with higher incidents of AFib [37]. SNS-activation may induce heterogeneous changes with arrhythmogenesis which may lead to AFib [38]. Sympatholytics may relieve AFib provocation. Device-based treatment, such as renal denervation and pulmonary vein isolation with ganglionated plexi-ablation, may also be effective [39]. Injecting botulism into epicardial fat pad during open-heart surgery reduced postoperative incidences of AFib for up to 3 years [40]. Stellate ganglion blockade may be an AFib treatment by increasing ventricular fibrillation threshold, thereby increasing AFib threshold [41]. High thoracic epidural anesthesia in postoperative patients may decrease incidence of AFib [42]. AFib demonstrates the usefulness of cardio-respiratory monitoring [43]. Approximately 80% of all AFib cases involve the ANS. Approximately 80% of the ANS-AFib cases involve ↑PSNS. The remaining 20% of the ANS-AFib patents appear to involve ↑SNS [44]. Thus, 64% of AFib involves ↑PSNS and suggests that the target of atrial ablation is more often PSNS-innervation. These data beg a more specific measurement of P&S activity. Sympathetic nerve stimulation may promote development of Afib in the lab. A recent study [45] demonstrated that renal denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal Afib with significant hypertension. Sympathetic stimulation reduced BP, cardiac hospitalizations, and recurrent Afib at 1 year compared to randomized controls. Autonomic modulation added to Afib pulmonary vein ablation may add to the effectiveness of the procedure on multiple fronts.

Hypertension

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation and renal denervation are two invasive, therapeutic approaches to resistant hypertension; however, recent results have been mixed [46]. The anti-hypertensive effect of renal denervation was accompanied by decreased SNS-activity, but minimal bradycardia in prior work [47]. ↑SNS is associated with hypertension. Most anti-hypertensives are known sympatholytics. Normalizing ↑SNS normalizes BP, assuming no other end-organ dysfunction (e.g., atherosclerosis). Normalizing resting ↑SNS, however, is not always sufficient. If ↑SNS persists with stress, MACE risk may persist, including risk of stroke.  Dynamic autonomic dysfunctions, such as those leading to poor cerebral perfusion (e.g., NOH and Syncope) may result in ↑SNS and eventually hypertension as a compensatory mechanism against poor cerebral perfusion.  Often these patients do not respond to antihypertension therapies where hypertension is assumed to be the primary disorder.

Stress in the Cardiovascular System

Acute stress elicits a typical cardiovascular response, a “defense reaction,” which involves ↑SNS with ↑PSNS which increases HR and SNS-activation. In contrast, the “defeat reaction” involves ↑SNS with ↓PSNS and reflects an ongoing reaction to chronic stress. While cortisol secretion occurs in both acute and chronic stress reactions in the “defeat reaction,” ↓PSNS & ↑SNS occurs to elevate BP without accompanying tachycardia. Persistent defense reactions lead to ↑PSNS-activity which may result in gastric hypersecretion and ulceration [48]. Aging is associated with ↓PSNS & ↑SNS and reduction in Baroreflex function which leads to greater BP-variability [49]. Aging also influences the adrenal- and ↑SNS-responses to mental stress. The adrenalin response is much lower in older men. Conversely, ↑SNS-response in the heart based on cardiac noradrenalin spillover, which is substantially higher in older men, could possibly be relevant in triggering cardiac arrhythmias and stress. Oxidative stress, through degradation of the mitochondria, negatively effects the cardiovascular system [50, 51]. These effects are compounded by the negative effect of oxidative stress on the ANS. The effect of oxidative stress on the ANS causes AD which compromises the control of the cardiovascular system exacerbating the effect of oxidative stress on the cardiovascular system. Common sources of oxidative stress are viral infections (including COVID-19), and all types of psychosocial stresses. The longer Vagus nerves (the majority of the PSNS outside the brain) are more significantly affected and earlier, than the SNS, which is a common cause of ↑SNS (high SB), leading to high BP, further exacerbating cardiovascular diseases such as HF.

Conclusions

Autonomic assessment is important in diagnosing and treating CHF, ventricular arrhythmias, AFib, hypertension, and CAN. Autonomic assessment may also predict which patients may be susceptible to MACE, including SCD. This is important since most CHF patients with SCD have preserved LVEF and better discriminators are needed. Many life-threatening cardiovascular disorders will require invasive testing within or proximal to the heart for precise diagnoses and therapy planning when modulating the P&S is important, with follow-up facilitated by P&S testing. In cases of non-life-threatening disorders, non-invasive ANS testing techniques, especially those that individually assess both ANS branches simultaneously and independently, are sufficient to diagnose and treat serially. [3, 52]). Each cardiac patient may be better approached individually with P&S tests, at the discretion of the clinician. For example, imaging studies requiring radioactive agents may best assess the need for a defibrillator in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and low LVEF. Whereas cardio-respiratory monitoring (P&S monitoring [3]) provides more serially, easily obtained, non-invasive information, and appears most appropriate for risk stratification and follow-up therapy, especially in CHF patients, as well as other cardiac disorders. The ability to serially test patients with non-invasive P&S monitoring enables follow-up to the invasive testing, especially for the life-threatening AD cases that may require modulation of ANS function to maintain. More information from serial, non-invasive P&S testing also enables earlier diagnoses, treatment, and possible prevention of AD disorders that may lead to cardiac disorders as a means of maintaining quality of life. More research is needed in early assessment and treatment of AD in cardiac disease management, especially in risk stratifying CHF patients and treating those who may be at high risk of SCD. Simultaneous assessment of both autonomic branches may play a key role. P&S Monitoring may provide more information that helps all physicians, helping family practitioners, internists, and specialists work together to manage and perhaps reduce cardiac disorders.
AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTIONDIFFERENTIATING RESPONSESINDICATIONSGENERAL THERAPY RECOMMENDATIONS*
ARRHYTHMIAOnly SB is valid for interpretation
Low SBResting PE contributing to the arrhythmiaRelieve PE, anti-Cholinergics
High SBResting SE contributing to the arrhythmiaRelieve SE, Sympatholytics
Normal SBNo autonomic contribution to the arrhythmiaNo autonomic therapy indicated
NO ARRHYTHMIA
REST
AAD (DAN)Morbidity Risk
Low SBPE, high Morbidity risk (e.g., Hypotension, Vagally-mediated CVD, Depression)Relieve PE, anti-Cholinergics
High SBSE, high Morbidity risk (e.g., HTN, Sympathetically-mediated CVD, Anxiety)Relieve SE, Sympatholytics
Normal SBNormal Morbidity riskTreat remaining symptoms and maintain Normal SB
CANMortality RiskComplete cardiac work-up as soon as possible, if not recent.
Low SBPE, high Mortality risk (e.g., Broken Heart Syndrome, Vagally-mediated CVD, SCD, Arrhythmia)Relieve PE, anti-Cholinergics
High SBSE, high Mortality risk (e.g., MACE, Sympathetically-mediated CVD, SCD, Arrhythmia)Relieve SE, Sympatholytics
Normal SBNormal Mortality riskTreat remaining symptoms and maintain Normal SB
CHALLENGE
SW

BP decreases

with Stand

NOH, fall risk indicator in older patients. Pre-clinical indication if SW with a BP response to Stand between 0/0 and 20/10 mmHg < resting BPFluids, Electrolytes, Compression garments, and low-dose Oral Vasoactives
Excessive HR responsewith StandPOTS, check for Vasovagal Syncope Pre-clinical indication if SW with a HR response to Stand < 30 bpm > resting HRFluids, Electrolytes, Compression garments, low-dose Oral Vasoactives, and low-dose Beta-Blocker
DIFFERENTIATING RESPONSESINDICATIONSGENERAL THERAPY RECOMMENDATIONS*
SW

BP increases

with Stand

OISlow-dose Oral Vasoactives
Long-standing with wide Pulse PressureHeart FailureTreat both SW & HF
PEwith Valsalva or StandTypically causes patients to be difficult to control (e.g., BP, blood glucose, hormone level, or depression/anxiety syndromes), or is associated with unexplained symptoms, including arrhythmia and seizure

If no SE, high SB, or high BP, Relieve PE with anti-Cholinergics

If SE, high SB, or high BP is present, Relieve PE with Carvedilol to treat both PE & SE or high BP

with Stand SEVasovagal Syncope, check for POTS; both may be treated concurrentlyTreat PE as the primary Dysautonomia with low-dose anti-Cholinergics
SEwith ValsalvaPossible HTN, MACE, Stroke and CVD risk, even with (apparently) normal resting BP & SBRelieve SE, titrate Sympatholytics
with PEVasovagal Syncope, check for POTS; both may be treated concurrentlyTreat PE as the primary Dysautonomia with low-dose anti-Cholinergics
with Stand & a weak HR response to StandNeurogenic SyncopeTreat Syncope
No PE & normal HR responses to StandDiagnosis by omission, possible Cardiogenic Syncope.Requires further testing

AAD Advanced Autonomic Dysfunction (similar to DAN without the diabetes-related issues), BP Blood Pressure, CAN Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy, CVD, Cardiovascular Diseases, DAN Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy (AD, with diabetes-related issues), HR Heart Rate, HTN Hypertension, MACE Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events including HF, SCD and Stroke, n/a not applicable, NOH Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension, OIS Orthostatic Intolerance Syndrome, PE Parasympathetic Excess, an excess PSNS-response to a stress, e.g., Valsalva or stand, POTS Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, SB Sympathovagal Balance = [resting SNS-response]/[resting PSNS-response], SCD Sudden Cardiac Death, SE Sympathetic Excess, an excess SNS-response to a stress, e.g., Valsalva or stand, SW Sympathetic Withdrawal, an insufficient SNS-response to head-up postural change, e.g., Stand

* All general therapy recommendations are history dependent and low-dose. All may be treated simultaneously. However, treating primary autonomic dysfunctions first may reduce or eliminate the therapy need for secondary dysfunctions

  46 in total

1.  Long-Term Suppression of Atrial Fibrillation by Botulinum Toxin Injection Into Epicardial Fat Pads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Evgeny Pokushalov; Boris Kozlov; Alexander Romanov; Artem Strelnikov; Sevda Bayramova; David Sergeevichev; Alexander Bogachev-Prokophiev; Sergey Zheleznev; Vladimir Shipulin; Vladimir V Lomivorotov; Alexander Karaskov; Sunny S Po; Jonathan S Steinberg
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-10-20

Review 2.  Vagal modulation and aging.

Authors:  Ronald Edmond De Meersman; Phyllis K Stein
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Spectral analysis of fluctuations in cardiovascular parameters: a quantitative tool for the investigation of autonomic control.

Authors:  S Akselrod
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY POSITION STATEMENT ON TESTING FOR AUTONOMIC AND SOMATIC NERVE DYSFUNCTION.

Authors:  Aaron I Vinik; Pauline M Camacho; Jaime A Davidson; Yehuda Handelsman; Howard M Lando; Anne L Leddy; Sethu K Reddy; Richard Cook; Vicenza Spallone; Solomon Tesfaye; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Baroreflex Activation Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Michael R Zile; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Fred A Weaver; Faiez Zannad; Elizabeth Galle; Tyson Rogers; William T Abraham
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation for Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Marmar Vaseghi; Parag Barwad; Federico J Malavassi Corrales; Harikrishna Tandri; Nilesh Mathuria; Rushil Shah; Julie M Sorg; Jean Gima; Kaushik Mandal; Luis C Sàenz Morales; Yash Lokhandwala; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Novel Interventional Therapies to Modulate the Autonomic Tone in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 12.035

8.  Carotid baroreceptor stimulation, sympathetic activity, baroreflex function, and blood pressure in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Karsten Heusser; Jens Tank; Stefan Engeli; André Diedrich; Jan Menne; Siegfried Eckert; Tim Peters; Fred C G J Sweep; Hermann Haller; Andreas M Pichlmaier; Friedrich C Luft; Jens Jordan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Autonomic Neuromodulation for Preventing and Treating Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Yanqiu Lai; Lilei Yu; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Cardiac autonomic testing and diagnosing heart disease. "A clinical perspective".

Authors:  Nicholas L DePace; Joy P Mears; Michael Yayac; Joseph Colombo
Journal:  Heart Int       Date:  2014-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.