Literature DB >> 3606237

Use of tubes and radiographs in the management of small bowel obstruction.

R E Brolin, M J Krasna, B A Mast.   

Abstract

During the past 10 years 311 consecutive patients were admitted with 342 episodes of small bowel obstruction (SBO). There were 193 cases of partial small bowel obstruction (PSBO) and 149 cases of complete small bowel obstruction (CSBO) as determined by interpretation of the abdominal radiographs done on admission. The purpose of this review was to determine the reliability of the admission plain abdominal radiographs and subsequent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies in predicting the need for operative intervention. The use of nasogastric tubes (NGT) versus nasointestinal (long) tubes (NIT) was correlated with the following outcome variables; length of hospital stay (LOS), timing of operative intervention, incidence of postoperative complications, and duration of postoperative ileus. Long tubes (NIT) were used in 64 episodes of PSBO and 81 episodes of CSBO, whereas nasogastric tubes (NGT) were used in 116 cases of PSBO and 68 cases of CSBO. Thirty-eight of 193 (19%) patients with PSBO required operation (20 of 116 with NGT and 18 of 64 with NIT), whereas 125 of 149 (84%) patients with CSBO required operation (60 of 68 with NGT and 65 of 81 with NIT). Need for operation was not correlated with whether or not long tubes passed beyond the pylorus; 50 passed versus 33 not passed in operative groups (p = 0.15). Twelve of 83 patients with NIT had operation within 24 hours versus 52 of 80 patients with NGT (p less than 0.001). In six of 64 patients who had surgery within 24 hours, complications developed versus in 39 of 99 patients operated on more than 24 hours after admission (p less than or equal to 0.001). In 29 of 83 patients treated with NIT, postoperative complications developed versus in 16 of 80 patients with NGT (p less than or equal to 0.04). The mean duration of postoperative ileus in patients with NIT was 7 days versus 4.1 days for NGT patients (p less than 0.001). The mean LOS was 12.2 days for NGT patients versus 21 days for patients with NIT (p less than 0.001). Barium UGI contrast studies were performed in 57 patients to establish the presence of obstruction. In 34 of 57 patients the UGI disclosed mechanical obstruction that required operative intervention. In the remaining 23 patients no obstruction was demonstrated, and all 23 patients recovered without operation. In conclusion, there is no inherent superiority of NIT versus NGT in the treatment of SBO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3606237      PMCID: PMC1493109          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198708000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Mechanical small bowel obstruction: a plea for earlier surgical intervention.

Authors:  R H Playforth; J B Holloway; W O Griffen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Forums in gastrointestinal roentgenology: roentgen evaluation of small-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  H I Goldberg; W J Dodds
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Use of the long tube in the management of patients with small-intestinal obstruction due to adhesions.

Authors:  P J Wolfson; J J Bauer; I M Gelernt; I Kreel; A H Aufses
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1985-09

4.  Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  R H Stewardson; C T Bombeck; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Early postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  J C Quatromoni; L Rosoff; J M Halls; A E Yellin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Review of small bowel obstruction at Milwaukee County General Hospital.

Authors:  A M Lo; W E Evans; L C Carey
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A current appraisal of problems with gangrenous bowel.

Authors:  W O Barnett; A B Petro; J W Williamson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Small bowel obstruction in the elderly.

Authors:  B J Zadeh; J M Davis; P C Canizaro
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Acute adhesive obstruction of the small intestine.

Authors:  S R Hofstetter
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-02

10.  Small bowel obstruction: the role of nonoperative treatment in simple intestinal obstruction and predictive criteria for strangulation obstruction.

Authors:  L S Bizer; R W Liebling; H M Delany; M L Gliedman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Contrast radiography and intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  Jon S Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Adhesive small bowel obstruction: how long can patients tolerate conservative treatment?

Authors:  Shou-Chuan Shih; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Shee-Chan Lin; Chin-Roa Kao; Sun-Yen Chou; Horng-Yuan Wang; Wen-Hsiung Chang; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Tsang-En Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Tube to freedom: use of a venting jejunostomy in a patient with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.

Authors:  Carlene Chun; Sabreen Aulakh; Fabio Komlos; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-02

6.  Transnasal fine gastrointestinal fiberscope-guided long tube insertion for patients with small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Hitoshi Nagata; Kazutoshi Takagi; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Nonsurgical management of partial adhesive small-bowel obstruction with oral therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shyr-Chyr Chen; Zui-Shen Yen; Chien-Chang Lee; Yueh-Ping Liu; Wen-Jone Chen; Hong-Shiee Lai; Fang-Yue Lin; Wei-Jao Chen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Value of water-soluble contrast (meglumine amidotrizoate) in the diagnosis and management of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Saleh Moh'd Al Al Salamah; Fraz Fahim; Shaukat Mahmood Mirza
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Reoperation for small bowel obstruction--how critical is the timing?

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

10.  Nasointestinal tube for decompression or enteroclysis: experience with 150 patients.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; F M Kelvin; L T Micon; M J Dorenbusch; S M Chernish; R F Graffis; L H Stevens; J C Lappas
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.