| Literature DB >> 36062281 |
Bendaxin Cao1,2,3, Ke Tian1, Hejun Zhou2,3, Chenjie Li2,3, Deliang Liu2,3, Yuyong Tan2,3.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Hepatic arterioportal fistulas (HAPFs) are abnormal shunts or aberrant functional connections between the portal venous and the hepatic arterial systems. Detection of HAPFs has increased with the advances in diagnostic techniques. Presence of HAPFs over a prolonged period can aggravate liver cirrhosis and further deteriorate liver function. However, the underlying causes of HAPFs and the treatment outcomes are now well characterized. This study aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics of patients with HAPFs, and to compare the outcomes of different treatment modalities.Entities:
Keywords: Cirrhosis; Embolization; Hepatic arterioportal fistulas; Hepatocellular carcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 36062281 PMCID: PMC9396316 DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Transl Hepatol ISSN: 2225-0719
Fig. 1Representative computed tomography findings of HAPF showing early enhancement of the portal vein in the arterial phase.
HAPF, hepatic arterioportal fistula.
Fig. 2Ultrasound image showing HAPFs under Doppler (A) and Sonovue contrast (B).
HAPF, hepatic arterioportal fistula.
Clinical characteristics of the study population
| Clinical feature | Value |
|---|---|
| Sex, % cases ( | |
| Male | 85.57 (83) |
| Female | 15.43 (14) |
| Mean age in years | 52.06±13.81 |
| Etiology, % cases ( | |
| HCC | 80.41 (78) |
| Cirrhosis* | 10.32 (10) |
| Congenital | 2.06 (2) |
| Portal spongiform transformation | 2.06 (2) |
| Portal hypertension | 2.06 (2) |
| Liver trauma | 1.03 (1) |
| Unclear | 2.06 (2) |
| HCC clinical classification, % cases ( | 100 (78) |
| Massive | 41 (32) |
| Diffuse | 35.9 (28) |
| Nodular | 23.1 (18) |
| Clinical manifestations, % cases ( | |
| Abdominal distension | 42.3 (41) |
| Abdominal pain | 40.2 (39) |
| Yellowish skin | 3.1 (3) |
| Anorexia | 2.1 (2) |
| Fatigue | 2.1 (2) |
| Chest pain | 2.1 (2) |
| Fever | 2.1 (2) |
| Hematemesis and melena | 1.0 (1) |
| Physical examination | 4.0 (4) |
*Nine out of the ten patients with liver cirrhosis had received medical intervention: three cases received liver biopsy, one received liver biopsy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, two received endoscopic variceal ligation, on received endoscopic variceal ligation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (commonly known as TIPS), and two received cholecystectomy. There was no evidence of HAPFs before these medical interventions; therefore, it is difficult to clarify whether HAPFs were spontaneous or iatrogenic. HAPF, hepatic arterioportal fistula; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Fig. 3Flow chart for management of the 97 cases of HAPF in the present study.
HAPF, hepatic arterioportal fistula.
Changes of liver function in patients after transcatheter arterial embolization.
| Liver function status | Before therapy | 3–5 days after therapy | Before therapy | 1 month after therapy* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child A | 47 | 58 | 0.001 | 42 | 55 | 0.001 |
| Child B | 16 | 5 | 15 | 2 | ||
| Child C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
*Six patients did not undergo liver function test at 1-month follow-up; therefore, only 57 cases are included.
Comparison of the outcomes of embolization of HAPFs with different embolization materials
| Embolization method | Effective clinical closure | Noneffective clinical closure | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyvinyl alcohol | 18 | 1 | 19 | 0.447 |
| Lipiodol+gelatin Sponge granules | 12 | 2 | 14 | |
| Spring steel | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| Total | 51 | 12 | 63 |
HAPF, hepatic arterioportal fistula.