| Literature DB >> 36062119 |
Abstract
In the recent years, public health has become a core issue addressed by researchers. However, because of our limited knowledge, studies mainly focus on the causes of public health issues. On the contrary, this study provides forecasts of public health issues using software engineering techniques and determinants of public health. Our empirical findings show significant impacts of carbon emission and health expenditure on public health. The results confirm that support vector machine (SVM) outperforms the forecasting of public health when compared to multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) technique. The findings are valuable to policymakers in forecasting public health issues and taking preemptive actions to address the relevant health concerns.Entities:
Keywords: Saudi Arabia; artificial neural network; forecasting; public health; support vector machine
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36062119 PMCID: PMC9433742 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Population rising trend (1996–2019) (Source: world development indicators).
Figure 2Death rate in Saudi Arabia (per 100,000) in 2019 (Source: world development indicators).
Overview of support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Vijayarani and Dhayanand ( | Kidney disease prediction using SVM and ANN algorithms | The interest of this research paper is to forecast kidney diseases by applying Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). | ANN is better than SVM. |
| Esmaeily et al. ( | Comparing three data mining algorithms for identifying the associated risk factors of type 2 diabetes | In this research, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machines (SVMs), and multiple logistic regression (MLR) models were used, using demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical features. | ANN achieves better results. |
| Madhuravani et al. ( | Prediction exploration for coronary heart disease aid of machine learning | The tentative result is on three forecast methods like SVM, K-NN and ANN. It is to generate and recognize the coronary heart disease using three diverse organize machine learning. | Several techniques have been applied for calculation methods, the finest accuracy found in ANN, the greatest precision in K-NN and the top recall in ANN. |
| Hooda and Mann ( | Examining the Effectiveness of Machine Learning | The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are performed to generate improved input influences (weights and bias) for the choice of best kernel to categorize the data for additional diagnosis. | SVM performed better than ANN |
| Son et al. ( | Application of support vector machine for prediction of medication adherence in heart failure patients | They function a Support Vector Machine (SVM), a machine-learning method valuable for data sorting. | SVM modeling is a capable classification method for forecasting medication adherence in heart failure patients |
| Mello-Román et al. ( | Predictive models for the medical diagnosis of dengue: a case study in Paraguay | They used Artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector machines (SVM) as supporting tools for medical diagnosis. | In their results, SVM polynomial attained outcomes above 90% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. |
Source of data.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Health | Exposure to PM2.5 | OECD |
| CO2 | Production-based CO2 intensity, energy-related CO2 per capita (Tons) | OECD |
| GDP | Real GDP | WDI |
| Health Expenditure | Current health expenditure per capita (current US$) | WDI |
| Population | Population ages 15–64, total | WDI |
Figure 3Architecture of artificial neural network (ANN).
Figure 4The proposed steps for the methodology of this study.
Figure 5Health issue since 2006–2020.
Figure 6Plot of health issues and prediction of testing data.
Autocorrelation of health issues [exposure to particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5)].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.45 | 0.02 | −0.16 | −0.27 | −0.23 | −0.41 | −0.05 | 0.47 | 0.92 | 0.43 | 0.12 | −0.54 | −0.26 |
The value of autocorrelation is higher at lag 12, however, we use lag 12 as independent variable along with other independent variables.
Unit root.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 0.001 | Stationary | 0.742 | Stationary |
|
| 0.000 | Stationary | 0.993 | Stationary |
|
| 0.027 | Stationary | 0.254 | Stationary |
|
| 0.000 | Stationary | 0.684 | Stationary |
|
| 0.000 | Stationary | 0.218 | Stationary |
The null hypothesis of ADF shows the presence of unit root in series. For KPSS, the null hypothesis presents the series are stationary. We found all the variables are stationary at level.
Stepwise regression results.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.992*** | 0.000 |
|
| −0.050** | 0.019 |
|
| 0.075** | 0.011 |
|
| −0.081*** | 0.000 |
|
| −0.093 | 0.742 |
| Constant | 3.686*** | 0.000 |
| R-squared | 0.997 | |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.997 | |
| S.E. of regression | 0.008 | |
| Sum squared residual | 0.008 | |
| Log likelihood | 446.950 | |
| F-statistic | 8455.636 | |
| Prob(F-statistic) | 0.000 |
The *** and ** symbols indicates the level of significance at 1 and 5 respectively.
Figure 7The graph shows the real health issues and forecasts from multiple linear regression (MLR), ANN, and support vector regression (SVR) for training data.
Mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) statistics to evaluate the forecasting performance.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Training data | 15.309 | 0.725 | 0.008 | 0.014 | 5.847 | 0.605 |
| Testing data | 0.233 | 4.838 | 0.010 | 0.015 | 0.186 | 0.163 |
Figure 8The percentage errors of MLR, ANN, and SVR models for testing data.
Figure 9The graph shows the real health issues and forecasts from MLR, ANN, and SVR for testing data.
Figure 10Forecasted health issues from October 2018 to October 2019.