Literature DB >> 36061938

Vaccination Against COVID-19 Disease During Pregnancy.

Austėja Voiniušytė1, Miglė Černiauskaitė2, Virginija Paliulytė3, Rūta Einikytė3, Diana Ramašauskaitė3.   

Abstract

Background: The effect of COVID-19 disease during pregnancy is still under investigation, however scientific studies have shown that pregnant women with COVID-19 infection are at increased risk for severe illness or complications [1]. Risk factors for severe disease and death in pregnancy include maternal age (especially ≥35 years), obesity, preexisting medical comorbidities (particularly hypertension and diabetes or more than one comorbidity), and being unvaccinated [2]. Many societies of obstetricians and gynecologists recommend that all pregnant patients undergo COVID-19 vaccination [1]. The aim of this study is to observe demographic characteristics, including education, place of residence and type of employment of women who chose to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in Lithuania, as well as to investigate any adverse reactions following the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy and compare the results to published scientific data. Materials and methods: An online questionnaire for pregnant women primarily located in Lithuania who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine before giving birth has been launched in July, 2021. Data were entered via Google Forms and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics. Literature review was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar search engines on inclusion criteria: publication date 2019-2021, used keywords pregnancy, COVID-19, vaccination, side effects.
Results: Data were collected from 227 women vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy. It was observed that the most chosen vaccine was Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 (196 out of 227 individuals (86%)). More pregnant women confirmed having fever after the second dose compared to the first dose (p=0.006). In addition, injection site pain was the most common local side effect after both doses (98%) and more common after the first dose compared to the second (p=0.002). Regarding systemic reactogenicity more women experienced fatigue after the second dose comparing to the first dose (p=0.01). Furthermore, more women were unable to engage in daily activities after the second dose (p=0.03). All other symptoms did not differ after doses 1 and 2. Conclusions: Overall findings of this study did not suggest any obvious safety signals among pregnant individuals who received COVID-19 vaccine and all the side effects were comparable to the general population. Completed literature review indicates that pregnant women vaccinated against COVID-19 experience the same side effects as individuals in general population and no specific postvaccination reactions among pregnant individuals are observed.
Copyright © 2022 Austėja Voiniušytė, Miglė Černiauskaitė, Virginija Paliulytė, Rūta Einikytė, Diana Ramašauskaitė. Published by Vilnius University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 infection; pregnancy; side effect; vaccination

Year:  2022        PMID: 36061938      PMCID: PMC9428649          DOI: 10.15388/Amed.2021.29.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Litu        ISSN: 1392-0138


Introduction

During vaccination against COVID-19 infection, concerns regarding vaccine safety for pregnant women have been raised. Even though pregnant women with COVID-19 infection have the same symptoms as the general population, studies show that they are more likely resulting in admission to an intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [3, 4, 9]. According to scientific data, pregnant women with COVID-19 infection are at increased risk for severe illness or complications (e.g., thromboembolic complications, hypertensive conditions, preterm labor, cesarean section, or death during pregnancy), as compared with nonpregnant reproductive age women [4-6, 9], thus preventing critical COVID-19 infection is important for both mother and fetus. Risk factors for severe disease and death in pregnancy include maternal age (especially ≥35 years), obesity, preexisting medical comorbidities (particularly hypertension and diabetes or more than one comorbidity), and being unvaccinated [2]. In addition, scientific data indicates that pregnant women with COVID-19 infection are at higher morbidity and mortality rate [7]. Currently available scientific data and the results of vaccinated pregnant women indicate the same efficacy of the COVID 19 vaccine as in the general population and no direct or indirect adverse effects on the developing fetus or the course of pregnancy have been observed [6]. Many societies of obstetricians and gynecologists recommend that all pregnant patients undergo COVID-19 vaccination [1]. Up to date recommendations given by Lithuanian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (LSOG) include that all women, who plan pregnancy, are pregnant or lactating should be vaccinated with mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 [8]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also recommends that COVID-19 vaccines should not be withheld from pregnant individuals or lactating individuals [9]. By this study we are aiming to observe demographic characteristics, including education, place of residence and type of employment of women who chose to be vaccinated against COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, the objective of this research is to investigate any adverse reactions following the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy and whether they differ after dose 1 and dose 2, as well as to compare the results of our research with the data published in the scientific literature.

Methods

In July 2021, we launched an online questionnaire for pregnant women primarily located in Lithuania who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine before giving birth. Enrollment to the study was voluntary. 243 women of age 19 to 52 (average 30.7 [SD=3.9]) with known pregnancy status who received at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine had filled out the survey. However, only 227 completed questionnaires containing the necessary information were selected for the final evaluation. The remaining questionnaires were incomplete or containing irrelevant information. Data were collected on COVID-19 vaccination uptake and doses received, vaccination type, gestational age at vaccination, vaccination perception, as well as self-reported demographics and maternal characteristics. Further data were collected on vaccination outcomes after the first and second doses. The criteria for classifying the severity of outcomes as mild, moderate, or severe were given to the participants. Data were entered via Google Forms and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics. Literature analysis was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar search engines on inclusion criteria: publication date 2019–2021, used keywords pregnancy, COVID-19, vaccination, side effects.

Results

Data were available for 227 pregnant women of whom 157 confirmed receiving 2 doses (Table 1). The majority received the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine (196 out of 227 individuals [86%]), the others received Vaxzevria AZD1222 (8%), Moderna mRNA-1273 (4%) and Janssen JNJ-78436735 (2%) vaccines. Most participants resided in cities, were working from home or in the office, and had completed higher education.
Table 1.

Characteristics of the vaccinated pregnant women

Characteristics

N

%

Vaccine type

           Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2

196

86

           Vaxzevria AZD1222

18

8

           Moderna mRNR-1273

9

4

           Janssen JNJ-7843675

4

2

Dose 1

227

100

Dose 2

157

69

Timing of first dose

           Before pregnancy

20

9

           First trimester

79

35

           Second trimester

90

40

           Third trimester

38

17

Timing of second dose

           First trimester

50

32

           Second trimester

68

43

           Third trimester

37

24

           After pregnancy

2

1

Number of pregnancies

           One

109

48

           Two

89

39

           Three

20

9

           More than three

9

4

Number of deliveries

           One

127

56

           Two

87

39

           Three

9

4

           More than three

4

1

Education

           Secondary

9

4

           Incomplete higher

7

3

           Higher (nonuniversity)

20

9

           Higher (university)

191

84

Type of employment

           Work from home

75

33

           Office work

64

28

           Work with a close contact to other people

47

21

           Manual labor

8

4

           Health care

41

18

           Not currently working

36

16

Residence

           City

203

89

           Small town

17

8

           Village

7

3

Information source about the possibility to get COVID-19 vaccine

           Internet

118

52

           Friends and family

16

7

           Health care institution

42

19

           TV

21

9

           Work

30

13

Incentive of vaccination

           My own decision

67

30

           Friends and family

40

18

           Health care workers

59

26

           TV, internet, press

47

21

           Work

14

6

Among all respondents, 48 individuals reported having fever after the first dose, with the most common temperature being 37.0–38.5 °C (54%). Statistically significantly more pregnant women confirmed having fever after the second dose (p=0,006), with the most common temperature of 37.0–38.5 °C (84%). 213 women (93%) reported any postvaccination reactions at or near the injection site after the first dose including pain, swelling, redness and itching (Fig. 1). By contrast, 131 out of 157 individuals (83%) reported any of the forementioned reactions at or near the injection site after the second dose. Injection site pain was the most common local side effect after both doses (98%) and more common after the first dose compared to the second (p=0.002).
Figure 1.

Postvaccination injection site reactions after dose 1 and 2

Characteristics N % Vaccine type Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 196 86 Vaxzevria AZD1222 18 8 Moderna mRNR-1273 9 4 Janssen JNJ-7843675 4 2 Dose 1 227 100 Dose 2 157 69 Timing of first dose Before pregnancy 20 9 First trimester 79 35 Second trimester 90 40 Third trimester 38 17 Timing of second dose First trimester 50 32 Second trimester 68 43 Third trimester 37 24 After pregnancy 2 1 Number of pregnancies One 109 48 Two 89 39 Three 20 9 More than three 9 4 Number of deliveries One 127 56 Two 87 39 Three 9 4 More than three 4 1 Education Secondary 9 4 Incomplete higher 7 3 Higher (nonuniversity) 20 9 Higher (university) 191 84 Type of employment Work from home 75 33 Office work 64 28 Work with a close contact to other people 47 21 Manual labor 8 4 Health care 41 18 Not currently working 36 16 Residence City 203 89 Small town 17 8 Village 7 3 Information source about the possibility to get COVID-19 vaccine Internet 118 52 Friends and family 16 7 Health care institution 42 19 TV 21 9 Work 30 13 Incentive of vaccination My own decision 67 30 Friends and family 40 18 Health care workers 59 26 TV, internet, press 47 21 Work 14 6 Further data were collected on general symptoms including fatigue, headache, myalgia or body pain, trembling, arthralgia, nausea, stomachache, diarrhea, vomiting and rash. 117 respondents (52%) reported having any of the aforementioned symptoms after the first dose and 109 respondents (69%) after the second dose (Fig. 2). Fatigue was the most frequently reported systemic side effect after both doses. Statistically significantly more women experienced fatigue after the second dose compared to the first dose (p=0.01). In addition, more women were unable to engage in daily activities after the second dose (p=0.03) (Fig. 3). All other symptoms did not differ after doses 1 and 2.
Figure 2.

Postvaccination systemic reactions after dose 1 and 2

Figure 3.

Postvaccination outcomes after dose 1 and 2

Discussion

The reported side effects of COVID-19 vaccine in general population have mostly been mild or moderate and short-lasting [10]. In addition, most patients have recovered without the need of hospitalization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) states that side effects from the vaccine are normal signs that body is building protection. Moreover, serious side effects that could cause long-term health problems are extremely unlikely following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination [10, 11]. Our study limitations include uninvestigated duration of postvaccination reactions and outcomes. The most common side effects of COVID-19 vaccine are local reactions which include pain at the injection site, redness, swelling, and systemic responses such as fever, fatigue, headache, myalgia, chills, diarrhea, and nausea [10, 11]. These reported patterns, with respect to both local and systemic adverse reactions, were similar to patterns observed among pregnant individuals in our survey-based research. We observed pregnant women vaccinated against COVID-19, who experienced local side effects including injection site pain, redness, swelling and itching, and systemic responses such as fatigue, headache, myalgia or body pain, trembling, arthralgia, nausea, stomachache, diarrhea, vomiting and rash. We found a similar trend for local reactions as for systemic reactions after both doses of vaccine. The most common symptoms observed were injection site pain and fatigue. Besides, in the study on short-term reactions among pregnant and lactating individuals in the first wave of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout performed in the USA in 2021 a similar pattern was found. Among all participants enrolled in the study the most common reported side effects were pain at the injection site and fatigue [5]. Furthermore, research on reactions and adverse events after the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine in general population released by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA, 2021) indicates that the most frequent postvaccination symptoms in general population are also injection site pain and fatigue [12]. Moreover, in the v-safe pregnancy registry performed in the USA, 2021 it was found that local and systemic reactions that were reported to the v-safe surveillance system were similar among people who identified as pregnant and nonpregnant women. In the aforementioned study it was observed that pregnant individuals did not report having more severe reactions than nonpregnant individuals, except for nausea and vomiting, which were reported moderately more frequently after the second dose, however the overall reactogenicity profile was similar [6]. In addition, some of the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 overlap with symptoms of normal pregnancy (e.g., fatigue, shortness of breath, nausea or vomiting), which should be considered during evaluation of symptomatic pregnant women [2]. Therefore, these results indicate that pregnant women vaccinated against COVID-19 experience the same side effects as individuals in general population and no specific postvaccination reactions among pregnant individuals are observed. Recently Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) has released a new analysis of the latest data from the v-safe pregnancy registry on vaccination early in pregnancy. The research of nearly 2500 pregnant women who received a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine before 20 weeks of pregnancy did not find an increased risk of miscarriage [13]. Statistical data show that about 8 to 15 percent of clinically recognized pregnancies and around 30 percent of all pregnancies end in miscarriage [14]. In the forementioned study the rates of adverse pregnancy after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine were about 13 percent [13]. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of miscarriage in women vaccinated against COVID-19 are similar to the adverse pregnancy incidences in the general statistics. Moreover, an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (BJOG) has published observed miscarriage rates after Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccination. The results of the study show one miscarriage in the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 placebo group and no miscarriages in the vaccine group, along with one miscarriage in the Moderna mRNA-1273 placebo group and no miscarriages in the vaccine group [9]. In addition, another study findings on spontaneous abortion following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy in the USA show that among women with spontaneous abortion, the odds of COVID-19 vaccine exposure were not increased in the prior 28 days compared with women with ongoing pregnancies [15]. Thus, present results do not prove the increased risk of miscarriage after COVID-19 vaccine. Limitation of our study is uninvestigated miscarriages after receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. Further studies on adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with maternal COVID-19 vaccination in Lithuania are required.

Conclusions

This study indicates that pregnant individuals in Lithuania prefer to be vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine during all trimesters of pregnancy over other vaccine types. Overall preliminary findings did not suggest any obvious safety signals among pregnant individuals who received COVID-19 vaccine and all the side effects were comparable to the general population. Completed literature analysis shows that pregnant individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 report the same side effects as individuals in general population and no specific postvaccination outcomes among pregnant women are observed.
  8 in total

1.  COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnant and Lactating Women.

Authors:  Emily H Adhikari; Catherine Y Spong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Pregnancy and COVID: what the data say.

Authors:  Nidhi Subbaraman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Trends in the incidence, rate and treatment of miscarriage-nationwide register-study in Finland, 1998-2016.

Authors:  R Linnakaari; N Helle; M Mentula; A Bloigu; M Gissler; O Heikinheimo; M Niinimäki
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Elyse O Kharbanda; Jacob Haapala; Malini DeSilva; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Kimberly K Vesco; Allison L Naleway; Heather S Lipkind
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Potential Maternal and Infant Outcomes from (Wuhan) Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Infecting Pregnant Women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and Other Human Coronavirus Infections.

Authors:  David A Schwartz; Ashley L Graham
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality Among Pregnant Women With and Without COVID-19 Infection: The INTERCOVID Multinational Cohort Study.

Authors:  José Villar; Shabina Ariff; Robert B Gunier; Ramachandran Thiruvengadam; Stephen Rauch; Alexey Kholin; Paola Roggero; Federico Prefumo; Marynéa Silva do Vale; Jorge Arturo Cardona-Perez; Nerea Maiz; Irene Cetin; Valeria Savasi; Philippe Deruelle; Sarah Rae Easter; Joanna Sichitiu; Constanza P Soto Conti; Ernawati Ernawati; Mohak Mhatre; Jagjit Singh Teji; Becky Liu; Carola Capelli; Manuela Oberto; Laura Salazar; Michael G Gravett; Paolo Ivo Cavoretto; Vincent Bizor Nachinab; Hadiza Galadanci; Daniel Oros; Adejumoke Idowu Ayede; Loïc Sentilhes; Babagana Bako; Mónica Savorani; Hellas Cena; Perla K García-May; Saturday Etuk; Roberto Casale; Sherief Abd-Elsalam; Satoru Ikenoue; Muhammad Baffah Aminu; Carmen Vecciarelli; Eduardo A Duro; Mustapha Ado Usman; Yetunde John-Akinola; Ricardo Nieto; Enrico Ferrazi; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Ana Langer; Stephen H Kennedy; Aris T Papageorghiou
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.

Authors:  Tom T Shimabukuro; Shin Y Kim; Tanya R Myers; Pedro L Moro; Titilope Oduyebo; Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos; Paige L Marquez; Christine K Olson; Ruiling Liu; Karen T Chang; Sascha R Ellington; Veronica K Burkel; Ashley N Smoots; Caitlin J Green; Charles Licata; Bicheng C Zhang; Meghna Alimchandani; Adamma Mba-Jonas; Stacey W Martin; Julianne M Gee; Dana M Meaney-Delman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  COVID-19 and novel mRNA vaccines in pregnancy: an updated literature review.

Authors:  E Joubert; A C Kekeh; C N Amin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.331

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.