Detection of Sn2+ ions in environmental and biological samples is essential owing to the toxicological risk posed by excess use tin worldwide. Herein, we have designed a nanoprobe involving upconversion nanophosphors linked with a rhodamine-based fluorophore, which is selectively sensitive to the presence of Sn2+ ions. Upon excitation with near-infrared (NIR) light, the green emission of the nanophosphor is reabsorbed by the fluorophore with an efficiency that varies directly with the concentration of the Sn2+ ions. We have explored this NIR-excited fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) process for the quantitative and ratiometric detection of Sn2+ ions in an aqueous phase. We have observed an excellent linear correlation between the ratiometric emission signal variation and the Sn2+ ion concentration in the lower micromolar range. The detection limit of Sn2+ ions observed using our FRET-based nanoprobe is about 10 times lower than that observed using other colorimetric or fluorescence-based techniques. Due to the minimal autofluorescence and great penetration depth of NIR light, this method is ideally suited for the selective and ultrasensitive detection of Sn2+ ions in complex biological or environmental samples.
Detection of Sn2+ ions in environmental and biological samples is essential owing to the toxicological risk posed by excess use tin worldwide. Herein, we have designed a nanoprobe involving upconversion nanophosphors linked with a rhodamine-based fluorophore, which is selectively sensitive to the presence of Sn2+ ions. Upon excitation with near-infrared (NIR) light, the green emission of the nanophosphor is reabsorbed by the fluorophore with an efficiency that varies directly with the concentration of the Sn2+ ions. We have explored this NIR-excited fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) process for the quantitative and ratiometric detection of Sn2+ ions in an aqueous phase. We have observed an excellent linear correlation between the ratiometric emission signal variation and the Sn2+ ion concentration in the lower micromolar range. The detection limit of Sn2+ ions observed using our FRET-based nanoprobe is about 10 times lower than that observed using other colorimetric or fluorescence-based techniques. Due to the minimal autofluorescence and great penetration depth of NIR light, this method is ideally suited for the selective and ultrasensitive detection of Sn2+ ions in complex biological or environmental samples.
Tin is one of the most widely utilized
heavy metals in industry.
It is used in both organic and inorganic forms, with applications
as diverse as antifouling paints, agrochemicals, poly(vinyl chloride)
(PVC) stabilizers, catalysts, biocides, etc. Owing to such widespread
use, over the last few decades, an excessive amount of inorganic and
organic tin has been released into the environment, as a result of
which it is found in large amounts in the air, water, and soil.[1−4] When these metal ions reach the human body through the food chain,
they have a major detrimental influence on health and induce a variety
of ailments.[5−8] Tin doses of more than 130 mg/kg have been seen to accumulate in
the kidneys, bones, and spleen.[9−11] Tin(II) ions can induce diarrhea
and DNA damage in the respiratory, reproductive, nervous, and digestive
systems. Nausea, vomiting, and upper respiratory tract discomfort
are all symptoms of moderate tin poisoning.[12−16] Acute tin poisoning can result in permanent renal
tubule damage and various neurological alterations leading to disorientation,
confusion, and memory loss, as well as severe epileptic seizures.[17−19] Therefore, methods of monitoring tin ion concentrations in environmental
and biological samples are essential.A number of analytical
methods have been used for the detection/screening
of Sn2+ ions, which include direct ion-concentration measurements
such as atomic absorption spectroscopy and microwave-induced atomic
emission spectrometry, or indirect, probe-based techniques such as
electrochemical, colorimetric, and fluorometric assays. The direct
methods, although provide good selectivity and sensitivity of detection,
are expensive and tedious, which makes them unsuitable for real-time
and in situ analysis.[20−23] Electrochemical methods, which
rely on differences in the redox potential of ions, have poor selectivity
and reproducibility. Certain colorimetry and fluorometry-based analytical
chemosensors, using organic dyes and nanoparticles, have been developed
for the selective detection of tin ions.[24−26] These sensors
have good selectivity but show poor sensitivity and reproducibility,
thus providing limited detection efficiency. Also, these sensors are
usually excited by high-energy light within the UV–vis region,
making them less likely to be utilized in the biological system due
to the short penetration depth of UV–vis light. Autofluorescence
and a poor signal-to-noise ratio are two apparent issues that degrade
sensing performance and photo-oxidize sensing probes.[27−29] As a result, the development of advanced sensing probes activated
by NIR light is urgently required.The sensitivity and depth
profiling of these optical sensors can
be improved with the use of near-infrared (NIR) light as the primary
excitation source. The NIR light is better suited as an excitation
source because it penetrates deeper into the tissue and causes less
harm to biological material than UV light.[30−35] Recently, lanthanide-doped upconverting nanophosphors (UCNPs) have
attracted significant interest in biological, analytical, and optoelectronic
applications because of their ability to convert NIR excitation light
into shorter wavelength light. In addition, they have several other
appealing optical and chemical features, including high Stokes shift,
low toxicity, weak autofluorescence backgrounds, and resistance to
photobleaching.[36−39] UCNPs constitute a dilute guest–host system, in which lanthanide
ions are doped as a guest in an appropriate dielectric host lattice.[40−43] UCNPs absorb two or more photons sequentially, resulting in the
emission of a single high-energy (low-wavelength) photon.[44−47] Several studies have shown that these characteristics make UCNPs
an excellent choice for use as an energy donor in nanoprobes based
on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET).[48−50] So far, numerous
sensors have been designed based on FRET to detect DNA, metal ions,
and small molecules, in which UCNPs transmit energy to other chromophores,
resulting in measurable changes in emission intensity/pattern.Herein, we have designed an UCNP-based chemosensor involving an
Sn2+-sensitive fluorescent probe (rhodamine-B derivative,
or RBD) covalently linked to poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)-coated UCNPs
(UCNP@PAA) and investigated its application in the ultrasensitive
detection of Sn2+ ions. Both UV–vis absorbance and
fluorescence emission properties of RBD are highly sensitive toward
Sn2+ concentration in the solution. The UCNPs act as an
energy donor that converts incident NIR light (of wavelength 980 nm)
into visible light for exciting RBD (energy acceptor). We have probed
in detail the FRET process between the UCNPs (characterized by the
attenuation in their green emission peaks) and attached RBD molecules
(characterized by concurrent enhancement in their red emission peak)
as a function of the concentration of Sn2+ ions in the
solution. Such FRET process allows ratiometric detection of the analyte,
which enhances the reproducibility and sensitivity of analysis when
compared to that obtained using traditional, single-mode analytical
methods. Therefore, this work combines the advantages of the high
selectivity of tin-ion detection using an organic probe (RBD) with
the high sensitivity and reproducibility offered by FRET-based ratiometric
detection involving UCNPs as an energy donor and RBD as an energy
acceptor and the high tissue penetration of incident NIR light for
potentially background-free detection in biological specimens. Based
on the observed data, we have carried out a ratiometric analysis of
the intensities of these emission bands and plotted the ratios against
the concentration of Sn2+ ions. Based on the data obtained,
we compared the detection limit of Sn2+ ion sensing obtained
with our technique with those of some other published reports.
Experimental Section
Materials
All of the chemicals were utilized without
additional purification. Y(NO3)3·6H2O (99.99%), Yb(NO3)3·6H2O (99.99%), Er(NO3)3·6H2O (99.99%),
diethylene glycol, poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), and ethylenediamine (reagent,
99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Oleic acid (90%, technical
grade), 1-octadecene (90%, technical grade), and hydrochloric acid
(HCl, analytical reagent 35–38%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar.
Rhodamine-B (RhB, 95%) and hydrazine hydrate 80 wt% solution in H2O were purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd. Ammonium fluoride
(NH4F, 99%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 97%), cyclohexane
(C6H12 99%), ethanol (C2H5OH, analytical reagent 99%), and methanol (CH4OH, analytical
reagent 99%) were purchased from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd. Double distilled
water was utilized to prepare all of the aqueous solutions. Aqueous
solutions of Sn2+, Hg2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Ni2+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, and Cs+ were made from the corresponding halide salts.
Synthesis of Upconverting Nanophosphors (NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+)
Uniform UCNPs (NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+) capped with oleic acid (OA) were
prepared via solvothermal synthesis.[51] In
a typical synthesis, 0.795 mmol of Y(NO3)3·6H2O, 0.20 mmol of Yb(NO3)3·6H2O, and 0.005 mmol of Er(NO3)3·6H2O were taken in a 100 mL round-bottom flask. Then, 15 mL of
octadecene and 5 mL of OA were added. A homogeneous solution was formed
upon heating to 160 °C for 30 min, after which the solution was
cooled to room temperature. Then, 10 mL of the methanol solution containing
0.148 g of NH4F and 0.1 g of NaOH was added to the flask
and heated to 60–80 °C to remove methanol from the reaction.
The solution was then degassed at 100 °C for 10 min and heated
under N2 protection to 300 °C. The solution was naturally
cooled to room temperature after being held at 300 °C for 1.5
h. The product NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanophosphors
were precipitated with ethanol from the solution and washed and centrifuged
using ethanol and cyclohexane to collect the nanoparticles.
Synthesis of PAA-Coated Upconverting Nanophosphors
The ligand-exchange approach was used to coat the surface of nanophosphors
with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA).[52] In a three-necked
flask, 0.5 g of PAA was added to 10 mL of diethylene glycol (DEG),
and the mixture was vigorously stirred at 110 °C to obtain a
clear solution. One hundred mg of UCNPs was dispersed in 5 mL of cyclohexane
and slowly added to the reaction mixture. Then, the above reaction
mixture was refluxed at 150 °C for 150 min in the presence of
nitrogen. After refluxing, the resulting mixture was heated to 240
°C for 30 min to remove the cyclohexane. After cooling the solution
to room temperature, ethanol was added to form a precipitate. The
PAA-coated nanophosphors were collected by centrifugation and washed
three times with ethanol/water (1:1 v/v).
Synthesis of Rhodamine-B Derivative (RBD)
The derivative
of rhodamine-B was synthesized by a simple reaction. First, 0.5 g
of rhodamine-B was dissolved in 15 mL of ethanol. Then, ethylenediamine
(2 mL, excess) was added dropwise to the solution with vigorous stirring,
and the mixture was refluxed for 24 h at 90 °C. The resulting
solution was pale orange in color. The mixture was then allowed to
cool to room temperature before extracting the solvent under decreased
pressure using a rotatory evaporator. Twenty-five and 15 mL of 0.1
M of HCl and 1 M of NaOH solutions, respectively, were prepared. The
as-prepared HCl solution was added dropwise to the mixture until gas
production was stopped to obtain a red solution. Then, the NaOH solution
was progressively added and agitated until the pH of the solution
reached around 10. To eliminate the remaining impurities, the precipitate
was centrifuged and rinsed five times with distilled water. The resulting
material was dried under a vacuum at 60 °C for 8 h to obtain
a cream-colored solid with excellent yield.
Synthesis of UCNP@PAA-RBD
In 10 mL of double distilled
water, 50 mg of PAA-coated UCNPs were taken and sonicated for 5 min.
Another solution of 50 mg of RBD was prepared in 1 mL of water, followed
by the addition of 100 μL of ethanol. Then, the RBD solution
was added to the UCNP dispersion and stirred for 24 h at room temperature.
In the reaction mixture, the free carboxylic groups of PAA-coated
UCNPs reacted with ethanol to form the corresponding polyacrylate
ester. Then, this ester reacted with the free amine groups of RBD
to form an amide linkage between the UCNP and RBD. The RBD-modified
UCNPs (UCNP@PAA-RBD) were collected after centrifugation and washed
three times with ethanol.
Detection of Tin Ions
In deionized water, stock solutions
of Sn2+ and other metal ions (0.1 mM) were prepared. A
stock solution of RBD (3 mg/mL) and UCNP@PAA-RBD (3 mg/mL) nanophosphors
were prepared in distilled water. The selectivity of metal ions was
determined as follows. First, we took 100 μL of the RBD stock
solution in 3 mL of water and added suitable volumes of metal ions,
including tin ions, to it. Then, UV–vis and fluorescence spectra
of the resulting solutions were recorded. For the detection, the same
amount of RBD stock solution in 3 mL of water was taken. Then, different
amounts of Sn2+ ions (in μM) were added using a micropipette,
followed by the recording of UV–vis and fluorescence spectra.
For the FRET-based detection, 100 μL of the stock solution of
UCNP@PAA-RBD was added to 3 mL of water, and the upconverting photoluminescence
spectra were recorded with different concentrations of Sn2+ ions (in ppm) under the NIR light (980 nm) excitation.
Characterization
The nanophosphors were subjected to
morphological characterization by field emission scanning electron
microscopy (FESEM) using scanning transmission electron microscopy
(STEM), MERLIN Zeiss-Germany. For that, the suspension of nanophosphors
was deposited on a copper TEM grid with a carbon film (TED Pella).
To confirm the exact shape and size of the nanoparticles, transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out using a TECNAI G2-30 U TWIN (FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands) instrument operated with
an accelerated voltage of 300 kV. The average hydrodynamic diameter
of the nanophosphors was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS),
using a NANO-ZS series Malvern Zetasizer instrument. Powder X-ray
diffraction measurement was done to analyze the phase composition
and crystalline nature of nanophosphors using a Bruker D8 Discover
X-ray spectrometer, which utilizes Cu Kα radiation (λ
= 1.54060 Å) over the 2θ range at the rate of 2.58/min.
FT-IR spectra were taken from the range of 4000 to 400 cm–1, where dried and powdered nanophosphors were mixed with KBr and
the mixture was passed into a pellet for analysis using a PerkinElmer
RX1 spectrometer. The absorbance and fluorescence spectra were observed
using a Shimadzu UV-1601 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan)
and a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA),
respectively. An upconversion fluorescence spectrometer (Quanta Master,
Model QM-8450-11), attached with an external 980 nm tunable diode
laser, was used to acquire the upconversion luminescence emission
spectra.
Results and Discussion
We first synthesized hexagonal
(β-phase) UCNPs (NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+) via the
solvothermal method, with NaYF4 serving as the host matrix
and dopant ions Yb3+ and Er3+ as sensitizer
and activator, respectively. These UCNPs were hydrophobic and well
dispersed in cyclohexane. PAA coating was done on the surface of UCNPs
to make them hydrophilic using the ligand-exchange approach, which
not only results in their optimal aqueous dispersion but also provides
free functional groups for further conjugation reactions. The fabrication
of the Sn2+-sensitive FRET-based probe is enabled by the
covalent linkage between PAA-modified UCNPs and ethylenediamine-tagged
derivative of rhodamine-B (RBD). This linkage during simple mixing
results in the strong binding of the acceptor (RBD) to the donor (UCNP)
surface. The RBD molecule, whether free or bound to the UCNPs, undergoes
a structural transition from a closed-ring (nonfluorescent) to an
open-ring (fluorescent) configuration as a result of the coordination
with Sn2+ ions. As the NIR-excited green emission peak
of the UCNP overlaps with the absorption spectrum of the open-ring
(Sn2+-coordinated) form of RBD, it is evident that with
the increasing Sn2+ concentration, FRET from UCNP (donor)
to open-ring RBD (acceptor) is enhanced, leading to the simultaneous
decrease and increase in the emission peaks of UCNP (green emission)
and RBD, respectively. This facilitates the ratiometric and quantitative
detection of Sn2+ ions via the FRET process
under NIR excitation, as shown schematically in Figure .
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure
of UCNP@PAA-RBD
and the proposed FRET-based sensing mechanism of UCNP@PAA-RBD with
Sn2+ ions.
Schematic illustration of the synthetic procedure
of UCNP@PAA-RBD
and the proposed FRET-based sensing mechanism of UCNP@PAA-RBD with
Sn2+ ions.The structural and morphological characterization
of nanophosphors
was done by utilizing FESEM and TEM. The low- and high-resolution
FESEM images showed that UCNPs were synthesized with uniform sizes
and had a hexagonal morphology (Figure A). From the low- and high-resolution TEM micrographs
(Figure B), it is
evident that UCNPs are hexagonal, with size in the range of 150–250
nm, thus validating the FESEM data. The average size and polydispersity
index (PDI) of the UCNPs, as evident from DLS measurements, were measured
to be 186.5 nm and 0.184, respectively (Figure S1). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of UCNP, UCNP@PAA,
and UCNP@PAA-RBD are shown in Figure C. The XRD pattern of all UCNP samples was in good
agreement with the standard database (JCPDS 16-0334),[53] validating the pure hexagonal phase of the UCNPs. No additional
peaks were found, indicating the purity of the prepared product. The
sharp peaks seen in the XRD pattern indicated the crystalline nature
of the synthesized material. The sharpness of peaks of UCNP@PAA and
UCNP@PAA-RBD was reduced because of the coating of PAA on the nanophosphors.
The existence of Na, Y, F, Yb, and Er in the prepared samples was
confirmed by the energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrum (Figure S2).
Figure 2
Low- and high-resolution (A) FESEM and
(B) TEM images of UCNPs.
(C) XRD patterns of the UCNP, UCNP@PAA, and UCNP@PAA-RBD, along with
the standard (JCPDS No. 16-0334).
Low- and high-resolution (A) FESEM and
(B) TEM images of UCNPs.
(C) XRD patterns of the UCNP, UCNP@PAA, and UCNP@PAA-RBD, along with
the standard (JCPDS No. 16-0334).Figure shows the
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of UCNP, UCNP@PAA, and
UCNP@PAA-RBD recorded in the 500–4000 cm–1 range. The FT-IR spectrum of the synthesized UCNPs shows four notable
peaks at 1462, 1612, 2854, and 2925 cm–1. The methylene
(−CH2−) asymmetric and symmetric stretching
vibrations of OA in the long alkyl chain were attributed to the bands
at 2925 and 2854 cm–1. Moreover, asymmetric and
symmetric stretching vibrations of the −COO– on the
surface of the UCNPs resulted in two bands centered at 1612 and 1462
cm–1, respectively. After PAA coating on the surface
of nanophosphors, the asymmetric stretching vibrations of the −CO
and −CO2 groups of the PAA ligand at 1560 and 1734
cm–1, respectively, were observed in the spectrum.
The symmetric stretching vibrations of CH2 caused another
peak in the higher-wavenumber region, i.e., 2926
cm–1 (νCH2). In addition, the stretching
vibration of the hydroxyl (−OH) group caused a wide singlet
at 3443 cm–1. The results showed that PAA successfully
converted the hydrophobic surface of nanoparticles to hydrophilic.
Also, three new peaks were observed at 1688, 1220, and 1115 cm–1, which corresponded to the stretching frequencies
of −NHCO, −C–N, and −CO groups. The peak
of the −OH group in UCNP@PAA disappeared, indicating its utility
in forming a covalent linkage with RBD. This was further confirmed
by the absence of the −NH2 peak (of free RBD) in
the UCNP@PAA-RBD conjugate.
Figure 3
FT-IR spectra of UCNP, UCNP@PAA, UCNP@PAA-RBD,
and free RBD.
FT-IR spectra of UCNP, UCNP@PAA, UCNP@PAA-RBD,
and free RBD.The synthesized UCNPs emitted characteristic emission
bands at
407 nm (blue), 522 nm, 542 nm (both green), and 655 nm (red), under
the NIR laser excitation of 980 nm (Figure A). These bands corresponded to Er3+ ion transitions 2H9/2 → 4I15/2, 2H11/2 → 4I15/2, 4S3/2 → 4I15/2, and 4F9/2 → 4I15/2, as already reported in several publications.[54−56] The structural and photoluminescence characteristics of RBD were
also studied. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra
(Figure S3) of RBD showed that the compound
was properly synthesized from rhodamine-B. The excitation and emission
spectra of RBD in the presence of Sn2+ ions are shown in Figure B. It is evident
from the graph that pure RBD (without added Sn2+) displayed
no apparent absorption/excitation. However, a broader, distinctive
excitation band ranging from 495 to 590 nm (λEm =
579 nm), with a peak at 554 nm, was seen after the addition of Sn2+ ions, which overlapped well with the two green upconverting
emission bands of UCNPs (at 522 and 542 nm). This data clearly shows
the overlap between the green emission bands of the UCNP and the absorption/excitation
band of the open-ring RBD, indicating the feasibility of energy transfer
from UCNP to the open-ring RBD. Finally, the emission band of the
open-ring RBD is observed with a maximum at around 579 nm (λEx = 525 nm).
Figure 4
(A) Photoluminescence spectrum of UCNPs under NIR (980
nm) laser
excitation. (B) Excitation and emission spectra of RBD, with and without
added Sn2+ ions.
(A) Photoluminescence spectrum of UCNPs under NIR (980
nm) laser
excitation. (B) Excitation and emission spectra of RBD, with and without
added Sn2+ ions.Figure A shows
the UV–vis absorption spectra of free RBD treated with various
metal ions, including Sn2+ ion. A noticeable enhancement
in the absorption spectra of RBD (centered at 554 nm) is found only
upon treatment with Sn2+ ion. This observation is visibly
evidenced by the change in the probe’s color from colorless
to magenta upon treatment with Sn2+ ions only (Figure B). This observation
confirms the RBD’s preferential affinity for Sn2+ ions over other metal ions. The Sn2+ ions can aid in
the hydrolysis of RBD’s α-amino acid ester ring, resulting
in the formation of Sn-α-amino acid chelate due to the ring
opening of RBD, as schematically illustrated earlier in Figure .
Figure 5
(A) UV–vis absorption
spectra of RBD upon the addition of
various metal ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, Sn2+, Cs+, Na+, K+)
in distilled water. (B) Visible appearance of the solutions upon the
addition of various metal ions, including Sn2+.
(A) UV–vis absorption
spectra of RBD upon the addition of
various metal ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, Sn2+, Cs+, Na+, K+)
in distilled water. (B) Visible appearance of the solutions upon the
addition of various metal ions, including Sn2+.The UV–vis titration spectra of the RBD
solution (100 μL
of stock in 3 mL of water) after the addition of increasing amounts
of Sn2+ ions (in the range of 0–50 μM) are
shown in Figure A.
The intensity of the absorption band centered at 554 nm grew noticeably
with the linear increase in Sn2+ concentration. A calibration
curve of the relative absorbance intensity of RBD as a function of
added Sn2+ ion concentration is depicted in Figure B. It can be seen that the
relative intensity increased linearly with the concentration, and
showed an R2 value of 0.9979. The detection
limit of RBD toward Sn2+, which was calculated as thrice
the deviation of the blank signal (3σ),[57] was found to be 0.15 μM.
Figure 6
(A) Absorption changes of RBD with increasing
amounts of Sn2+ ions. Inset: absorbance of RBD at 554 nm
as a function of
Sn2+ concentration. (B) Calibration plot for the relative
absorption intensity at 554 nm of RBD as a function of Sn2+ concentration.
(A) Absorption changes of RBD with increasing
amounts of Sn2+ ions. Inset: absorbance of RBD at 554 nm
as a function of
Sn2+ concentration. (B) Calibration plot for the relative
absorption intensity at 554 nm of RBD as a function of Sn2+ concentration.The fluorescence spectrum of RBD toward various
metal ions is shown
in Figure S4A. Similar to the UV–vis
spectral data, significant enhancement in the fluorescence intensity
(at 579 nm) was observed after treatment of RBD with Sn2+ ions only, thus validating the preferential affinity of the dye
for Sn2+ ions over other metal ions. In the fluorescence
titration spectra (Figure A) of the RBD solution (100 μL of stock in 3 mL of water),
a considerable increase in fluorescence intensity at 579 nm was recorded
upon treatment with different concentrations of Sn2+ ions.
The fluorescence intensities (at 579 nm) of RBD as a function of Sn2+ ion concentrations are shown in Figure A (inset). This intensity was found to be
linearly dependent on the concentration of Sn2+ ions. The
calibration curve with different concentrations of Sn2+ displayed a colinear relationship (F/F0 = 0.0212CSn – 0.0152, R2 = 0.9935), as shown
in Figure B. The detection
limit (3σ) by utilizing fluorescence techniques was calculated
to be 0.29 μM, indicating that we could detect ecologically
relevant quantities of Sn2+ utilizing this approach. The
time-dependent response of RBD toward Sn2+ ions was also
examined by fluorescence spectroscopy. The response of RBD (100 μL
of stock in 3 mL of water) to Sn2+ was quick, as shown
in Figure S4B, and the peak signal was
reached in approximately 40 s. This analysis demonstrated that the
nanoprobe responded very fast to Sn2+ ions and might be
conveniently used to monitor and evaluate Sn2+ levels.
Figure 7
(A) Change
in the fluorescence intensity of RBD with the increasing
concentration of Sn2+ ions (λEx = 525
nm). Inset: fluorescence intensity at 579 nm as a function of Sn2+ ion concentration. (B) Relative fluorescence intensity at
579 nm of RBD as a function of Sn2+ ion concentrations.
(A) Change
in the fluorescence intensity of RBD with the increasing
concentration of Sn2+ ions (λEx = 525
nm). Inset: fluorescence intensity at 579 nm as a function of Sn2+ ion concentration. (B) Relative fluorescence intensity at
579 nm of RBD as a function of Sn2+ ion concentrations.Furthermore, we repeated the RBD-mediated Sn2+ detection
experiment using UV–vis absorption and fluorescence measurements
in a buffer with pH = 7. The data for absorption and fluorescence
measurements are provided in Figures S5A,B and S6A,B, respectively. It is evident that the data obtained by
carrying out the optical measurements in water are very similar to
that obtained in the buffer solution of pH 7.We next investigated
whether the detection sensitivity of Sn2+ ions can still
be improved with the help of UCNPs that allows
FRET-based ratiometric analysis under excitation of deep-tissue-penetrating
NIR light. First, the upconverting emission spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD
were analyzed using various concentrations of Sn2+ ions
under NIR laser (980 nm) excitation. As mentioned previously, the
green emission peak of UCNP and the absorption peak of the RBD–Sn2+ combination overlaps, leading to fluorescence resonance
energy transfer (FRET) from the UCNPs to the RBD–Sn2+ complex under NIR excitation. As illustrated in Figure A, UCNP@PAA-RBD displays both
green emission peaks and red emission peaks in the absence of Sn2+ ions. Next, when the Sn2+ ions are added to UCNP@PAA-RBD
in increasing concentrations, the intensity of green emission peaks
(at 522 and 542 nm) steadily decreases, while an additional, broader
emission appears with a peak at 579 nm, which can be attributed to
the attached RBD–Sn2+ complex. The energy transfer
from the UCNPs to the RBD–Sn2+ complex is confirmed
by a continuous drop in peaks of green emission and the appearance
of a wide band at around 579 nm with the increasing concentration
of Sn2+ ions, whereas the red emission of UCNPs at 655
nm remains almost consistent. The red emission intensity (at 655 nm)
of UCNPs can be utilized as an internal reference since RBD does not
absorb at this wavelength.
Figure 8
(A) Emission spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD in the
presence of the increasing
concentration of Sn2+ ions upon 980 nm excitation. Inset:
emission at 579 nm as a result of FRET upon the addition of Sn2+ ions. (B) Variation in normalized GRE and RRE at different
concentrations of Sn2+ ions.
(A) Emission spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD in the
presence of the increasing
concentration of Sn2+ ions upon 980 nm excitation. Inset:
emission at 579 nm as a result of FRET upon the addition of Sn2+ ions. (B) Variation in normalized GRE and RRE at different
concentrations of Sn2+ ions.At different concentrations of Sn2+ ions,
the green-to-red
emission (GRE) ratios (I542/I655), as well as the RBD-to-red emission (RRE) ratio (I579/I655), are shown
in Figure S7. Figure B shows the variation in both normalized
GRE and RRE ratios at various concentrations of Sn2+ ions.
The UCNP emission/RBD absorption overlap and the consequent FRET are
supported by the changing trends of both GRE and RRE as a function
of added Sn2+ concentration, with UCNP as the energy donor
and Sn2+ ion-coordinated RBD as the energy acceptor. High R2 linear fits are obtained for both the GRE
(0.9925) and RRE (99 809) forms, demonstrating very precise
and reliable Sn2+ sensing. In the presence of different
Sn2+ concentrations (0–50 μM), the ratio of I542/I655 and I579/I655 varies
from 4.9 to 1.0 and 0.01 to 0.24, respectively, exhibiting strong
linear correlation (I542/I655 = −0.0776x + 4.7569, R2 = 0.9925 and I579/I655 = 0.0046x + 0.0175, R2 = 0.9980, where x is the concentration
of Sn2+ ions in μM).The slope of the calibration
curves determines the sensitivity
of the Sn2+ measurement. The GRE and RRE are found to have
sensitivities of 0.0776 and 0.0046 per unit change in concentration
(in μM), respectively. This ratiometric analysis can be utilized
to calculate the Sn2+ ion concentration because free RBD
coordinated with Sn2+ ion does not show any fluorescence
under the 980 nm excitation. The RBD emission intensity response to
Sn2+ ion concentration has a strong linear coefficient
(R2) up to 0.99809, implying excellent
quantification capabilities. The detection limit (3σ) by utilizing
this FRET-based upconverting nanophosphor photoluminescence spectroscopy
is found to be as low as 10 nM (0.01092 μM), which is more than
10-fold better than that observed using UV–vis and fluorescence
techniques for free RBD treated with Sn2+ ions. The determined
detection limit is far lower than the World Health Organization (WHO)
approved Sn2+ contamination levels of 2.1 × 10–6 and 8.4 × 10–4 M for drinking
water and other products, respectively.[58] When compared to some other reported probes, the UCNP@PAA-RBD nanoprobe
shows a better detection limit for Sn2+ ions, as shown
in Table .
Table 1
Comparison of Detection Limits for
Sn2+ Ion Using UCNP@PAA-RBD with Other Reported Probes
S. No.
probe name
media
method
detection
limit (μM)
reference
1
SEPTD
DMF
absorption/emission
0.17
(59)
2
2CND
water
emission
0.41
(60)
3
copolyimides
methanol
quenching
1.9
(61)
4
carbazole-containing diarylethene
methanol
emission
1.9
(62)
5
rhodamine-B with tert-butyl carbazate
group
(R2)
ethanol/water
emission
0.46
(63)
6
Rh-ED
ethanol/water
emission
0.16
(64)
7
diamine Schiff base ligand (L)
DMSO/water
absorption/emission
0.31
(24)
8
CK
PBD/ethanol
emission
0.11
(65)
9
GO-CeM
HAc-NaAc/TMB
colorimetry
5.58
(66)
10
UCNP@PAA-RBD
water
FRET
0.01
this work
The ratio of the emission intensity at 579 nm (I579) to the intensity at 542 nm (I542) and vice versa, against the Sn2+ concentration range from 0 to 50 μM, are shown in Figure S8A,C, respectively, which shows an exponential
variation in the ratios. However, the plots of logarithmic emission
intensity ratios for the same against the concentration of Sn2+ ions were found to have a good linear relationship (Figure S8B,D). In the range of 0–50 μM, R2 is 0.9936, which was the linear correlation
coefficient. Figure A shows the FRET process using the nanoprobe using an even more subtle
variation in the Sn2+ ion concentration (1–5 μM).
As we observe from the graph, the FRET resulting in the variation
of such low analyte concentration is visually noticeable from the
spectra; even 1 μM of Sn2+ ions alter the green emission
peak because of the efficient FRET process in the nanoprobe. The normalized
GRE and RRE ratio at different concentrations of Sn2+ (0–5
μM) is shown in Figure B. Here, we also obtain high R2 linear fits for both GRE and RRE, which is similar to the previous
data, again confirming the high sensitivity toward Sn2+ ions as shown in Figure S9. The ratios
of I542/I655 and I579/I655 for the concentration ranges from 0 to 5 μM exhibit a strong
linear correlation (I542/I655 = −0.1514x + 5.0246, R2 = 0.9935 and I579/I655 = 0.0156x + 0.0121, R2 = 0.9962, where x is the concentration
of Sn2+ ions in μM). The detection limit (3σ)
from this low-concentration data was observed to be 10 nM (0.010248
μM), which correlates with the data taken for the concentration
range of 0–50 μM for Sn2+ ions. Further, the
actual and logarithmic ratios of emission intensity at 579 nm (I579) to intensity at 542 nm (I542) and vice versa, against Sn2+ concentration ranges from 0 to 5 μM, are shown in Figure S10, which shows an exponential correlation
of the actual ratios and a linear correlation for the logarithmic
ratios with analyte concentration. The pH-dependent response of UCNP@PAA-RBD
toward Sn2+ detection has also been examined. The upconverting
emission spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD, with and without Sn2+ ions, in the pH range of 4–9 are recorded and the GRE and
RRE responses are analyzed. As illustrated in Figure S11A,B, the variation in GRE and RRE before the addition
of Sn2+ ions is negligible, but in the acidic and alkaline
pH, the green emission intensity of UCNP is still less compared to
that in neutral pH. After the addition of Sn2+ ions (10
μM), the efficient energy transfer has been observed from the
graph (the GRE values decrease and RRE values increase in all pH values),
indicating that pH has little impact on the FRET process and detection
analysis. These results further confirm the successful transfer of
energy between the UCNP and RBD even at a low analyte concentration
and in a wider pH range. Therefore, these nanophosphor-based probes
can be used for the ultrasensitive detection of Sn2+ ions
in various samples, following NIR excitation.
Figure 9
(A) Upconversion emission
spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD upon addition
of Sn2+ ions below 5 μM. (B) Variation in normalized
GRE and RRE at the Sn2+ ion concentration of 0–5
μM.
(A) Upconversion emission
spectra of UCNP@PAA-RBD upon addition
of Sn2+ ions below 5 μM. (B) Variation in normalized
GRE and RRE at the Sn2+ ion concentration of 0–5
μM.
Conclusions
In summary, we have developed polymer-modified
and RBD-functionalized
upconverting nanophosphors for the FRET-based ultrasensitive detection
of Sn2+ ions. Here, UCNPs acted as the energy donor and
convert the NIR (980 nm) into visible light, which was absorbed by
the RBD molecules only in the presence of Sn2+ ions. This
nanoprobe exhibited a fast response to Sn2+ ions, a low
autofluorescence background, and strong selectivity. With the addition
of Sn2+ ions, the nanoprobe generated a clear color shift
from colorless to magenta, which could be seen with the naked eye,
accompanied by an increase in fluorescence emission. More importantly,
when excited by NIR (980 nm) light, the intensity of green upconversion
emissions reduced progressively, while a new emission peak at 579
nm developed, which grew with increasing Sn2+ ion concentration,
corresponding to the efficient FRET from UCNP to the RBD–Sn2+ complex. The ratiometric approach provided an efficient
and reliable response for the detection of Sn2+ with a
detection limit of 0.01 μM, which is a tenth of that of pure
RBD and is lower than the WHO-approved contamination levels of Sn2+ ions. This demonstrates that the nanophosphors have high
sensitivity and selectivity toward Sn2+ ions and can be
used to detect under the excitation of NIR light.
Authors: Mustafa Tuzen; Ozgur Dogan Uluozlu; Durali Mendil; Mustafa Soylak; Luana O R Machado; Walter N L Dos Santos; Sergio L C Ferreira Journal: Food Chem Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 7.514