| Literature DB >> 36061607 |
Jun Liang1,2, Yanxin Song3, Abdelkader Nasreddine Belkacem4, Fengmin Li1, Shizhong Liu1, Xiaona Chen1, Xinrui Wang1, Yueyun Wang1, Chunxiao Wan1.
Abstract
Balance rehabilitation is exceedingly crucial during stroke rehabilitation and is highly related to the stroke patients' secondary injuries (caused by falling). Stroke patients focus on walking ability rehabilitation during the early stage. Ankle dorsiflexion can activate the brain areas of stroke patients, similar to walking. The combination of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was a new method, providing more beneficial information. We extracted the event-related desynchronization (ERD), oxygenated hemoglobin (HBO), and Phase Synchronization Index (PSI) features during ankle dorsiflexion from EEG and fNIRS. Moreover, we established a linear regression model to predict Berg Balance Scale (BBS) values and used an eightfold cross validation to test the model. The results showed that ERD, HBO, PSI, and age were critical biomarkers in predicting BBS. ERD and HBO during ankle dorsiflexion and age were promising biomarkers for stroke motor recovery.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; balance rehabilitation; brain-computer interface; fNIRS; stroke
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061607 PMCID: PMC9433808 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.968928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
FIGURE 1Experimental scenario.
FIGURE 2A session trail.
FIGURE 3Signal acquisition. (A) EEG electrodes, and (B) fNIRS probe arrangement.
FIGURE 4Mean of nERSP at Cz for (A) 8 patients and (B) 6 healthy control group.
FIGURE 5ERD index of patients and the control group.
FIGURE 6PSI index of patients and the control group. *Significant difference.
FIGURE 7Cerebral blood oxygen concentration during ankle flexion.
Age, ERD, HBO, and BBS of the patients.
| Patient | Age | ERD | HBO | BBS |
| P1 | 60 | −1.834 | 1.905 | 55 |
| P2 | 74 | −0.396 | 1.999 | 33 |
| P3 | 49 | −1.977 | 0.211 | 40 |
| P4 | 64 | −0.695 | 0.098 | 8 |
| P5 | 33 | −0.979 | 2.925 | 46 |
| P6 | 32 | −0.448 | 2.066 | 55 |
| P7 | 67 | −0.825 | 1.170 | 40 |
| P8 | 49 | −0.790 | 2.000 | 40 |
| Avg. | 54 | −0.993 | 1.547 | 39.6 |
Multiple linear regression model.
| Independent variable | β (95% CL) | |
| Constant | 30.6 (17.2, 44.0) | 0.107 |
| ERD | −12.4 (−16.5, −8.4) | 0.054 |
| HBO | 37.3 (28.9, 45.8) | 0.021 |
| AGE | −0.5 (−0.7, −0.3) | 0.075 |
| HBO | −10.6 (−13.7, −7.4) | 0.043 |
*Multiplication sign.
FIGURE 8Scatterplots showing the relations between the actual and predicted BBS scales.
FIGURE 9Scatterplots showing the relations between the actual and predicted BBS scales for cross validation.