| Literature DB >> 36061594 |
Haiyun Ma1, Yujia Zhai1, Zhen Xu1, Shengnuo Fan1, Xian Wu1, Jing Xu1, Shaoling Wu1, Chao Ma1.
Abstract
Background: Electrical stimulation of the cerebellar fastigial nucleus (FNS) has been shown to protect animals against cerebral ischemic injury. However, the changes in cortical activation as a response to FNS have not been illustrated in humans. Objective: This study aims to detect functional connectivity changes in the brain of stroke patients, and investigate the cortical activation caused by FNS through measuring the oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (HBO) in the cerebral cortex of stroke patients and healthy controls (HCs).Entities:
Keywords: cerebellar fastigial; cortical activation; electrical stimulation; functional near infrared spectroscopy; oxygenated hemoglobin concentration
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061594 PMCID: PMC9433974 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.895237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 5.152
FIGURE 1Experiment equipment and procedures. (A) The experimental process consisted pre-task baseline, task period, and post-task baseline. The block design in task period is made up of 5 cycles of 2 states: 30 s of FNS and 30 s of rest. (B) Location of electrodes for FNS: bionic low-frequency biological current from 2 transcutaneous electrodes is transmitted along the mastoid process to the fastigial nucleus. (C) The source optodes, detector optodes and channels: 39 Channels according to the 10/10 system. 6 cerebral areas were measured: LPFC, RPFC, LMC, RMC, LOC, and ROC.
Characteristics comparison between stroke group and HCs.
| Stroke ( | HCs ( | T/Z/χ2 |
| |
| Age (years) | 42 (30.0, 49.75) | 30 (28.39) | 1.93 | 0.056 |
| Gender (M/F) | 17/3 | 16/4 | 0.17 | 0.677 |
| Weight (kg) | 63 (8.9) | 58 (8.4) | 1.77 | 0.085 |
| Height (cm) | 173 (162.5, 175.8) | 165.5 (160.3, 172.3) | 1.66 | 0.096 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22 (2.3) | 21 (1.8) | 1.18 | 0.242 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 126 (17.9) | 123 (9.6) | 0.73 | 0.473 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 82 (13.2) | 84 (6.1) | –0.55 | 0.584 |
| Time poststroke (month) | 4 (2.1) | – | – | – |
| MRS | 3 (0.7) | – | – | – |
| NIHSS | 10 (4.5) | – | – | – |
| MBI | 45 (12) | – | – | – |
HCs, Healthy controls; BMI, Body mass index; MRS, Modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; MBI, Modified Barthel index.
FIGURE 2Spatial patterns of the functional connectivity in the FNS state and resting state. (A) Networks of FNS-related changes in functional connectivity between stroke patients and HCs. (B) Histograms of functional connectivity distribution in the two groups. (C) Functional connectivity in patients with stroke showed significant decreases in different cerebral regions when compared with HCs.
Channels with HBO significantly increased when compared with the resting baseline during FNS.
| ROI of cortical area | Channels |
| L-DLPC | 9 23 24 |
| R-DLPC | 3 17 19 |
| L-PT | 11 12 25 |
| R-PT | 3 4 18 |
| L-PMC | 31 30 |
| R-PMC | 15 16 34 |
| L-SMC | 13 |
| R-SMC | 1 2 28 |
| L-VAC | 38 39 |
| R-VAC | 36 37 |
| Obitorfrontal area | 5 6 8 |
| Frontopolar area | 7 |
L, left; R, right; DLPC, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; PT, Pars Triangular; PMC, Primary Motor Cortex; SMC, Supplementary Motor Cortex; VAC, Visual Association Cortex.
*p < 0.05 in the stroke group.
#p < 0.05 in the stroke group and HCs.
FIGURE 3Brain map of activation regions during FNS by using beta values of GLM analysis in the (A) HCs, and the (B) stroke patients. The color bar represents the P-value of beta values.
FIGURE 4Grand average waveforms of HBO changes during FNS in each ROI based on Brodmann in stroke patients. The vertical axis represents concentration changes of HBO and HBR; while the horizontal axis represents the latency. The start time of the FNS period was defined as 0 s. The ROI contained 12 cerebral areas, which include the bilateral Visual Association Cortex, bilateral Primary Motor Cortex, bilateral Supplementary Motor Cortex, bilateral Pars Triangular, bilateral Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Frontopolar area and Obitorfrontal area.