Literature DB >> 36061279

Psychological distress and its influencing factors among psychiatric nurses in China: A cross-sectional study.

Juan Wang1, Zhongren Zheng2, Yingxue Tang3, Rui Zhang4, Qinghua Lu5, Bin Wang6, Qihua Sun7.   

Abstract

Background: Psychiatric nurses often face abuse, attacks, escape, suicides, and other situations related to the care of patients with mental disorders, which are more likely to induce psychological distress. Aims: This study aimed to examine the relationship between coping styles and psychological distress among Chinese psychiatric nurses in Shandong and the significance of sleep quality as a mediating factor.
Methods: A total of 812 psychiatric nurses in Shandong, China, were investigated using the Psychological Distress Scale (K10), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and self-compiled general information questionnaire.
Results: Psychological distress was detected in 571 psychiatric nurses (70.3%). The psychological distress of psychiatric nurses was significantly different with respect to professional title (χ2 = 10.627, P < 0.05) and shift work (χ2 = 9.120, P < 0.01). Psychological distress positively correlated with negative coping style (r = 0.266, P < 0.01) and sleep quality (PSQIT) (r = 0.532, P < 0.01). A significant positive correlation was found between psychological distress and all dimensions of sleep quality (r = 0.158-0.456, P < 0.05). Professional title, positive coping style, negative coping style, sleep quality (PSQIT), subjective sleep quality, sleep disorder and daytime dysfunction predicted psychological distress in psychiatric nurses (R 2 = 0.363, F = 65.343, P < 0.01). The relationship between negative coping style and psychological distress was partially mediated by sleep quality, with the mediating effect accounting for 37.97% of the total effect. Conclusions: Psychiatric nurses have a high rate of psychological distress, which is closely related to coping styles, and sleep quality has a certain regulatory effect.
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Zheng, Tang, Zhang, Lu, Wang and Sun.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; coping styles; psychiatric nurse; psychological distress; sleep quality

Year:  2022        PMID: 36061279      PMCID: PMC9428287          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.948786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   5.435


Introduction

Psychological distress refers to a non-specific negative psychological state whereby individuals have a perceived inability to cope with stress (1, 2). Psychological distress presents with mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and anxiety, which can lead to a more severe mental illness when undetected. A study reported that approximately 543 million people in 2016 experienced psychological distress because of anxiety and depression (3). With the increase in life expectancy and occupational stress worldwide, the prevalence of mental illness and psychological problems has increased. Studies have also found a higher frequency of mental issues in health care workers than in the common populace, and they are more prone to work stress and depression (4). Nurses face various occupational pressures and considerable psychological troubles. For example, witnessing the suffering and death of patients, medical errors and adverse events, complex interpersonal relationships, and occupational pressures such as promotion and examination; thus, nurses are prone to psychological distress (5). More than 70% of nurses experience anxiety, depression, tension, and dejection in their personal emotional life and work (6). Psychiatric nurses who took care of patients with mental disorders often face abuse, assaults, beatings, suicide, escape, and other situations; thus, nurses and patients with mental disorders should establish more complex interpersonal relationships. However, psychiatric nurses generally bear the greater psychological pressure and severe psychological distress (7). Thus, far, only a few large-sample studies have focused on psychological distress among psychiatric nurses. Psychological distress is influenced by several factors, including mental growth (8), social support (9), symptom burden (10), unmet needs of the patients (11), sleep disorder (12, 13), and others. Coping styles have been proved to be a reliable psychological and behavioral technique for dealing with external and internal obstacles positively or negatively, which is closely related to psychological distress (14, 15). A positive coping style will more often than not be related to addressing issues directly and rationally, whereas a negative coping style is inclined to figure out problems by ignoring, avoiding, and denying (16). Roesch et al. (17) showed that an inclination to embrace a positive coping style valuably affects physical and psychological well-ness, whereas a negative coping style antagonistically affects physical and emotional well-being, resulting in psychological distress (18). This presents a huge connection between coping styles and psychological distress, that is, the degree of psychological distress is lower when a positive coping style is adopted, whereas the level of psychological distress is higher when a negative coping style is adopted. Sleep is an integral part of health, growth, and survival (19). Sleep disorder refers to the abnormal quantity and quality of sleep, including reduced or excessive sleep and abnormal sleep-related behaviors, which influence personal satisfaction and physical and psychological well-ness (20). Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder among the general population, and 10−30% of the world's population are enduring insomnia (21). Insomnia is more common among Chinese nurses, especially psychiatric nurses (22). Kalmbach et al. found that participants diagnosed with insomnia had an increased risk of developing physical and mental disorders, including chronic pain, back pain, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, anxiety, and depression, compared with healthy participants (23). Moreover, studies have found that both poor sleep quality and insomnia may increase the risk of developing mental illness (24). People with poor sleep quality have a higher degree of psychological distress (25). Sleep disorders among nurses on shifting work schedules are caused by the dys-synchronization of the endogenous physiological system of the circadian rhythm. Fatigue and sleepiness worsened because of the decreased amount of sleep, leading to general physical and mental health problems (26). Moreover, an imbalance between the sleep-wake cycle and the endogenous circadian system aggravates various hormonal and metabolic processes that may adversely influence physical and emotional well-being; compared with day workers, shift workers are more likely to develop chronic illnesses such as cardiovascular, metabolic and psychological disorders (27). A link between sleep quality and psychological distress was reported, that is, insomnia and short sleep duration can decrease mood and augment anxiety, increasing psychological distress (28). The relationship between sleep quality and psychological distress is ascribed to the activation of the rapid eye movement (REM) sleep mechanism, as people with REM sleep behavior have a significantly increased risk of anxiety and depression (29). At present, only a few studies have examined the connection between sleep quality and psychological distress in the field of psychiatric nursing; thus, it is worthy of further investigation. Despite studies on the effects of coping styles and sleep quality on psychological distress (30, 31), the underlying regulatory mechanisms are not well understood. These studies have shown that negative coping style not only directly affects psychological distress but also has mediating variables, such as exercise habits and experiential avoidance (32, 33). Thus, recent research presents that other underlying mediators or mechanisms are at play between negative coping style and psychological distress. With this, we hypothesized that sleep quality mediates negative coping style and psychological distress. This study aimed to explore the relationship between sleep quality, coping styles, and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses. This study further explored whether sleep quality plays a mediating role between negative coping and psychological distress to provide theoretical support for nursing management in the psychiatric department and thereby improve the mental health of psychiatric nurses.

Materials and methods

Participants

This was a cross-sectional study with stratified sampling performed between November to December 2020. According to the geographical characteristics of Shandong province, 17 prefecture-level cities were divided into six following areas: northwest, southwest, southern, northern, and central Shandong province and the Shandong Peninsula. A tertiary psychiatric hospital was randomly selected from the counties and cities in the six geographical areas using a random number table. All clinical nurses in the hospital were the study subjects. A total of 904 clinical nurses were randomly enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) 18–60 years with no sex or marital status restrictions; (2) working duration of at least 1 year; (3) national nurse practice registration qualification and practice registration in the unit; (4) clinical ward nurses; and (5) those who were on duty and volunteered for the investigation. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) those younger than 18 years or older than 60 years; (2) working duration of < 1 year; (3) non-official staff of the unit including advanced, practicing, and visiting nurses; (4) those on leave for more than three consecutive months; and (5) those who refused to participate in the survey (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Flow diagram of subjects recruitment and study selection (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Flow diagram of subjects recruitment and study selection (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Ethical issues

In this study, the researcher firstly conducted online training for the participants to introduce basic information and fill in the requirements of the questionnaire in detail. The questionnaire strictly followed the principle of confidentiality, and all participants provided written informed consent before the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Mental Health Center. During the review process, privacy was completely safeguarded. The study protocol followed the moral norms of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Measures

General information

Age, sex, marital status, educational level, professional title, income, work shift and working duration were defined in the general information questionnaire.

Psychological distress

The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), compiled by Kessler et al. (34) and revised by Zhou et al. (35) (Chinese version of the revised scale comprises 10 items and evaluates an individual's level of psychological distress on a scale of 1 to 5) was used to evaluate the psychological distress. A score of ≥16 on this scale indicates the presence of psychological distress; 10–15 indicates almost no psychological distress; 16–21 indicates mild psychological distress; 22–29 indicates moderate psychological distress, and 30–50 indicates severe psychological distress. Thus, the higher the score, the more severe the psychological distress. In this study, Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.930.

Simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ)

The SCSQ was developed by Xie (36) and included 20 items for the positive and negative coping styles. The Chinese version of the questionnaire was used to evaluate and reflect the characteristics of different coping styles among populations. To measure the characteristics of a positive coping style, 12 items were assessed. For instance, items included: “seeking advice from relatives, friends, or classmates” and “seeking interests and being active in recreational and sports activities.” The measure for the negative coping style dimension comprised 8 items. Examples included: “trying to take a break or vacation to put the problem (worry) behind you for a while” and “trying to forget the whole thing.” Cronbach's α coefficient of 12 items of the positive coping style was 0.890, whereas that of the eight items of the negative coping style was 0.780. The retest reliability of the scale was 0.890. Cronbach's α of the negative coping style was 0.809 in this study.

Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)

The PSQI, compiled by Buysse et al. (37) has been tested for reliability and validity in China by Liu et al. (38) and is utilized to assess the sleep quality of participants within the last month. The Chinese edition of the PSQI was viewed as a substantial measure of sleep quality. The Chinese version of the questionnaire, suitable for domestic research, was used in this study to assess each dimension. This index included seven factors, namely, subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep persistence, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of hypnotic drugs and day-time dysfunction. Each factor was scored 0–3, and the cumulative score of each component represents the PSQI total score, ranging from 0 to 21 points. Patients were characterized as individuals who scored >7 points, and those who scored ≤ 7 points were non-patients. Thus, the higher a person's score, the worse the sleep quality. Cronbach's α was 0.839.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data entry and statistical analysis, and P < 0.05 was considered significant. The univariate analysis was performed using the t-test and chi-square test to evaluate the relationship between sample characteristics and variables. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage. The correlations among the negative coping style, sleep quality and psychological distress were analyzed using Pearson correlation, multiple stepwise regression analysis, structural equation modeling, R 4.1.2, and non-parametric percentile bootstrap test.

Results

Sample characteristics

Of the total 904 questionnaires sent out, 850 were collected, and 812 were valid, of which the effectiveness rate was 89.8%. The average age of the 812 psychiatric nurses was 32.69 ± 8.07 (range, 18–58) years. Of the respondents, 208 were male (25.6%) and 604 were female (74.4%). Regarding marital status, 630 were married (77.6%) and 182 were not married (22.4%). A total of 471 participants (58.0%) held a bachelor's degree or higher, and 341 (42.0%) had a college degree or lower grade levels. Of the 812 respondents, 283 were nurses (34.9%), 294 (36.2%) were junior nurses, 193 (23.8%) were senior nurses, and 42 (5.2%) were associate superintendent nurses. Regarding the income, 243 earned < 3000 yuan (29.9%), 384 earned 3000–5000 yuan (47.3%) and 185 earned > 5000 yuan (22.8%). Furthermore, 130 participants were working day shifts (16.0%), whereas 682 had a three-shift rotation (84.0%). The working duration ranges from 1 to 40 years, with an average working duration of 6 years (P25 = 3 years, P75 = 15 years).

Comparison of participant characteristics and K10 scores

The suffer group was defined as K10 ≥16 points, and K10 <16 as the non-suffer group. Moreover, 29.7% of the respondents had K10 scores <16 points, 571 (70.3%) scored ≥16, and 24.96 ± 6.85 was the average K10 score. Regarding scores of psychological distress, a significant difference was found in the professional title (χ2 = 10.627, P < 0.05) and work shift (χ2 = 9.120, P < 0.01), but age, sex, marital status, education level, income and working duration did not show any significant differences (Table 1).
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics and comparisons of the scores on K10 (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Variables N K10≥16 Prevalence (%) χ2 P
Age<30 years37925968.341.5170.468
30–39 years25418572.83
≥40 years17912770.95
SexMale20814067.311.2160.270
Female60443171.36
Marital statusMarried63044670.790.3020.583
Single18212568.68
Educational levelCollege degree or below34122967.162.8210.093
Bachelor's degree or above47134272.61
Professional titleNurse28318565.3710.6270.014
Junior nurse29420971.09
Senior nurse19315178.24
Associate superintendent nurse422661.90
Income ≤3000 yuan24316065.843.5950.166
3000–5000 yuan38428072.92
>5000 yuan18513170.81
Work shiftDay shift only1307759.239.1200.003
Three-shift rotation68249472.43
Working duration<3 years1589862.037.0410.071
3–5 years20414973.04
6–10 years19513770.26
>10 years25518773.33

“Three-shift rotation” is a fixed rotating shift schedule, which consists of an 8-h day shift, an 8-h swing shift and an 8-h night shift.

Sociodemographic characteristics and comparisons of the scores on K10 (n = 812, Shandong, China). “Three-shift rotation” is a fixed rotating shift schedule, which consists of an 8-h day shift, an 8-h swing shift and an 8-h night shift.

Relationship between PSQI, SCSQ and K10 among psychiatric nurses

Compared with non-sufferers (K10 < 16), the average positive coping style score of sufferers was 22.69 ± 6.02 (range, 0–36) (t = 4.029, P < 0.01), and the average negative coping style score of sufferers was 10.38 ± 4.75 (range, 0–24) (t = −5.865, P < 0.01). The average sleep quality (PSQIT) score of sufferers was 7.31 ± 3.69 (range, 0–19) (t = −13.941, P < 0.01), whereas the average subjective sleep quality score of the sufferers was 1.33 ± 0.84 (range, 0–3) (t = −12.015, P < 0.01). The average sleep latency score of the sufferers was 1.47 ± 0.89 (range, 0–3) (t = −7.920, P < 0.01), whereas that of the sufferers was 1.30 ± 0.99 (range, 0–3) (t = −7.853, P < 0.01). The average habitual sleep efficiency score and average sleep disorder score of the sufferers were 0.55 ± 0.88 (range, 0–3) (t = −3.964, P < 0.01) and 1.26 ± 0.67 (range, 0–3) (t = −9.790, P < 0.01), respectively. The average hypnotic drug use score and average daytime dysfunction score of the sufferers were 0.22 ± 0.64 (range, 0–3) (t = −5,465, P < 0.01) and 1.16 ± 0.92 (range, 0–3) (t = −10.810, P < 0.01), respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Analysis of different groups of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Factor Sufferers K10 ≥ 16 Non-sufferers K10 < 16 t p
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
Positive coping style22.69 ± 6.0224.58 ± 6.314.029<0.01
Negative coping style10.38 ± 4.758.37 ± 4.34−5.865<0.01
Sleep quality (PSQIT)7.31 ± 3.694.22 ± 2.47−13.941<0.01
Subjective sleep quality1.33 ± 0.840.69 ± 0.62−12.015<0.01
Sleep latency1.47 ± 0.890.97 ± 0.81−7.920<0.01
Sleep persistence1.30 ± 0.990.80 ± 0.73−7.853<0.01
Habitual sleep efficiency0.55 ± 0.880.33 ± 0.65−3.964<0.01
Sleep disorder1.26 ± 0.670.84 ± 0.52−9.790<0.01
Use hypnotic drugs0.22 ± 0.640.05 ± 0.24−5.465<0.01
Daytime dysfunction1.16 ± 0.920.54 ± 0.68−10.810<0.01

PSQIT-The total score of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index.

Analysis of different groups of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China). PSQIT-The total score of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Psychological distress was positively correlated with the negative coping style (r = 0.266, P < 0.01), sleep quality (PSQIT) (r = 0.532, P < 0.01), and all dimensions of sleep quality (r = 0.158–0.456, P < 0.05) (Table 3). To more clearly describe the correlation between the indicators, we plot the correlation heat map using R 4.1.2, as displayed in Figure 2.
Table 3

Relationship between sleep quality and its various dimensions, coping styles and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Psychological distressPositive coping styleNegative coping styleSleep quality (PSQIT)Subjective sleep qualitySleep latencySleep persistenceHabitual sleep efficiencySleep disorderUse hypnotic drugsDaytime dysfunction
Psychological distress1
Positive coping style−0.155**1
Negative coping style0.266**0.174**1
Sleep quality (PSQIT)0.532**−0.177**0.137**1
Subjective sleep quality0.456**−0.164**0.118**0.782**1
Sleep latency0.371**−0.163**0.133**0.715**0.575**1
Sleep persistence0.318**−0.083*0.0530.700**0.426**0.359**1
Habitual sleep efficiency0.158**−0.05−0.0270.524**0.221**0.202**0.541**1
Sleep disorder0.420**−0.133**0.111**0.649**0.502**0.434**0.277**0.126**1
Use hypnotic drugs0.212**−0.0440.090*0.449**0.265**0.187**0.175**0.128**0.240**1
Daytime dysfunction0.447**−0.146**0.147**0.650**0.490**0.374**0.231**0.0610.449**0.290**1

PSQIT-The total score of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index;

P < 0.01,

P < 0.05.

Figure 2

Heat map of the relationship between sleep quality and its various dimensions, coping styles and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Relationship between sleep quality and its various dimensions, coping styles and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China). PSQIT-The total score of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index; P < 0.01, P < 0.05. Heat map of the relationship between sleep quality and its various dimensions, coping styles and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Predictors of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses

A multiple stepwise regression analysis was employed to analyse the predicting factors of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (Table 4). The dependent variable was psychological distress, and the independent variables were professional title, shift work, positive coping style, negative coping style, sleep quality (PSQIT), subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep persistence, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disorder, use of hypnotic drugs and day-time dysfunction. Professional title (β = 0.084, P < 0.01), positive coping style (β = −0.105, P < 0.01), negative coping style (β = 0.204, P < 0.01), sleep quality (PSQIT) (β = 0.235, P < 0.01), subjective sleep quality (β = 0.101, P < 0.05), sleep disorder (β = 0.119, P < 0.01) and daytime dysfunction (β = 0.142, P < 0.01) were factors associated with psychological distress (R2 = 0.363, F = 65.343, P < 0.01).
Table 4

Predictors factors of psychological distress in psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Variable B SE β t P Tolerance VIF
(Constant)12.1521.17110.382<0.01-
Professional title0.7680.2590.0842.964<0.010.9791.021
Positive coping style−0.1380.039−0.105−3.546<0.010.9111.098
Negative coping style0.3510.0500.2046.994<0.010.9321.073
Sleep quality (PSQIT)0.5220.1260.2354.129<0.010.2454.081
Subjective sleep quality0.9810.4390.1012.232<0.050.3872.584
Sleep disorder1.4710.4600.1193.201<0.010.5751.740
Daytime dysfunction1.2770.3350.1423.807<0.010.5681.760

R2 = 0.363, Adjusted R2 = 0.357, F = 65.343, P < 0.01.

Predictors factors of psychological distress in psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China). R2 = 0.363, Adjusted R2 = 0.357, F = 65.343, P < 0.01.

Sleep quality as a mediating factor between negative coping style and psychological distress

To test our hypothesis that sleep quality mediates the relationship between negative coping style and psychological distress, we performed a stratified regression analysis. The independent variable was the negative coping style (X), the mediating variable was sleep quality (M) and the dependent variable was psychological distress (Y). First, the regression equation coefficient c of negative coping on psychological distress demonstrated significance (P < 0.01), and the influence coefficient a of negative coping style on sleep quality also presented significance (P < 0.01). Finally, the influence coefficients c' and b of sleep quality and negative coping style on psychological distress were significant (P < 0.01). This finding suggests that sleep quality partially mediates the negative coping style and psychological distress (Table 5).
Table 5

Stratified regression models for sleep quality, negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Analysis and model Dependent variable Independent variable b b' R2 Adjusted R2 t p
Y = cX + e1K10NCS0.4580.2660.2660.0707.868<0.01
M = aX + e2SQNCS0.1060.1370.1370.0183.941<0.01
Y = c'X + bM + e3K10NCS0.3390.1970.5670.3196.743<0.01
SQ1.1210.5050.5670.31917.255<0.01

NCS, negative coping style; SQ, sleep quality (PSQIT).

Stratified regression models for sleep quality, negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China). NCS, negative coping style; SQ, sleep quality (PSQIT). Based on the results of the stratified regression analysis, we further constructed a structural equation model of the relationship between negative coping style, sleep quality and psychological distress (Figure 3). The original fit parameters of this model were as follows: χ2 = 296.972, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.113, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.838, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.849, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.926, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.871 and chi-square/degrees of freedom (GMIN/DF) = 11.422. These parameters demonstrated that the model was not appropriate. After adjusting the model, its fitness was good on the basis of the following parameters: χ2 = 79.171, RMSEA = 0.052, NFI = 0.957, CFI = 0.970, GFI = 0.978, AGFI = 0.961 and GMIN/DF = 3.167. The difference in each route structure was significant (P < 0.01). Negative coping style and sleep quality have direct, indirect and overall consequences on psychological distress, as shown in Table 6. According to the findings, a negative coping style had both direct and indirect effects on psychological distress, whereas sleep quality had only direct effects on psychological distress. Subjective sleep quality had the highest absolute value (0.80) among the seven dimensions of sleep quality, followed by sleep latency (0.67).
Figure 3

Standardized estimates of the relationship between negative coping style, sleep quality, and psychological distress (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Table 6

Mediating effect of sleep quality between negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China).

Variables Total effect Direct effect Indirect effect
NCS scores0.2660.1660.101
Sleep quality0.5780.5780.000

NCS, negative coping style.

Standardized estimates of the relationship between negative coping style, sleep quality, and psychological distress (n = 812, Shandong, China). Mediating effect of sleep quality between negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses (n = 812, Shandong, China). NCS, negative coping style.

Discussion

Analysis of the status quo of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses

This study found that the incidence of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses was 70.3%. Moreover, 571 participants had a K10 score of ≥16, with an average score of 24.96 ± 6.85. The incidence of psychological distress observed in this study was lower than that reported by Liu et al. (39), which was 83.8%. The difference was possibly due to the inclusion of samples from six geographic regions in Shandong. Compared with patients admitted in provincial hospitals, patients with mental disorders treated in municipal hospitals have milder symptoms and the pressure on nurses is minimal. Moreover, compared with nurses in provincial hospitals, the number of nurses with higher positions, ongoing promotion and continuing education are small; thus, studies have only reported a low incidence of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses. In the present study, the occurrence of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses was lower than that of college students evaluated by Li et al. (40), which was 81.4%. The possible reason is that psychiatric nurses are becoming more stable professionally and have higher education and stable work than college students. On the contrary, college students are still in the process of developing professionally and going to school, and their families have very high expectations of them, resulting in a higher degree of psychological distress. Meanwhile, psychiatric nurses have been engaged in psychiatric psychology and mental health education for a long time and have self-regulation ability when experiencing psychological distress; thus, the incidence of psychological distress in psychiatric nurses is low. Furthermore, a univariate study of sociodemographic data revealed that psychological distress was not influenced by age, sex, marital status, education, income, and working duration. However, it was strongly linked to professional title and shift work. This could be related to the fact that nurses bear multiple pressures from family, occupation and society simultaneously. In addition, professional nurses are exposed to constantly high levels of pressure, resulting in psychological distress (41). A study revealed that work pressure is emphatically connected with depression among nurses (42). Moreover, junior nurses have better physical fitness, high energy levels, adjustment ability and lower incidence of psychological distress. Nurse supervisors and those with higher positions have stable family, occupational, and social status, rich nursing experience, emergency response ability and lower incidence of psychological distress. Our study revealed that 72.43% of shift nurses had psychological distress, whereas 59.23% of day nurses have psychological distress and found a link between psychological distress and work shift. Studies have shown that shift work increases the risk of poor mental health and that shift employees have a 33% higher risk of experiencing poor mental state and depression than non-shift workers. Shift work can lead to changes in sleep patterns and mood changes such as depression, anxiety, irritability and nervousness (43). Studies have found that shift work in nursing disturbs the circadian rhythm, increases day-time sleepiness and reduces personal readiness, resulting in poor general, physical and mental health and the occurrence of sleep disorders, ultimately reducing work efficiency and affecting the quality of care (44). Psychiatric nurses are commonly at risk for the development of mental illness. Adverse events such as savage attacks, suicide and harm by the patients often occur at night; thus, psychiatric nurses are always in a high state of tension at work, leading to psychological stress.

Correlation analysis of sleep quality, negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses

This study showed that among psychiatric nurses, sufferers (K10≥16) and non-sufferers of psychological distress (K10 < 16) demonstrated significant differences in coping styles, the total score of sleep quality and its various dimensions. A negative coping style was positively associated with sleep quality and psychological distress. Negative attitudes and emotions will affect the development of physical and mental health. Moreover, a negative coping style is linked to more mental health issues, whereas a positive coping style is related to fewer mental health issues (45). The possible reason is the tendency to adopt negative coping strategies in the face of problems, which will increase the number of negative events. These individuals have a relatively negative view of the problems and choose to withdraw, disengage and refuse to communicate with others, with their emotions as the center, thus intensifying psychological pressure and leading to psychological distress. Therefore, when faced with negative events, nurses should adopt positive coping strategies, focus on the problem, choose humor and actively communicate with others. Studies have shown that insomniacs often adopt negative and immature coping styles (46); excessive avoidance will affect sleep quality and generate more pressure, which will lead to psychological distress (47). Psychological distress among psychiatric nurses was positively connected with sleep quality and its various components. The poorer the sleep quality, the higher the degree of psychological distress; this corresponds with the findings of Kain and Caldwell-Andrews (48) and Roberts et al. (49). Thus, the poorer the sleep quality, the greater the interference with the normal pace of study, work and family life, ultimately increasing stress and psychological distress. Furthermore, individuals create negative feelings such as anxiety and depression that can disrupt the balance between central sympathetic and cholinergic activities, affect the regulation of sleep by the brain, prolong fast-wave sleep and then lead to sleep disorders. Sleep disorders are considered secondary symptoms of mental illness (50). Sleep is assumed as an indispensable part of mental well-being and is in a dynamic interaction with psychological distress. Therefore, nurses should gain relevant knowledge of sleep, understand the mechanism between sleep and mental well-being, reduce sleep problems and ultimately avoid events that induce psychological distress.

Sleep quality as a mediator factor between negative coping style and psychological distress

The results of the stratified regression analysis and Amos model revealed that the sleep quality of psychiatric nurses partially mediated the connection between negative coping style and psychological distress. This indicated that negative coping can directly affect psychological distress and sleep quality can indirectly affect psychological distress, in which sleep quality plays a certain regulatory role. According to a previous study, a delayed peak sleep-wake rhythm will cause a vicious cycle of circadian rhythm disorders and poor sleep, which will increase the incidence of anxiety and depression (51). Moreover, among patients with depression, some have increased plasma cortisol secretion, the altered circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion and spontaneous inhibition of cortisol secretion at night. The use of drugs such as dexamethasone will not inhibit cortisol production but leads to depression (52). Studies have found that improved sleep effectively reduced psychological stress and vice versa. A connection was found between sleep quality and psychological distress, and sleep deprivation was related to a series of negative health and psychosocial consequences, showing reciprocal or bidirectional relationships between the two (53). That is, if sleep desynchronisation occurs, a person will experience drowsiness, nocturnal insomnia, significantly reduced arousal threshold and easy wakefulness, followed by anxiety, depression, restlessness and irritability. Conversely, when a person is anxious, depressed, restless or disappointed, he/she is forced to fall asleep, which will aggravate the original sleep disorders. Studies have found that sleep disorders, anxiety disorders, and depressive disorders were all related to the functional activity of serotonin, which is an important bridge between circadian rhythm disruption and depression. Furthermore, a bidirectional communication was found between serotonin and the circadian system, and sleep disorders, anxiety disorders and depression disorders were all related to the regulation of the circadian system. Numerous physiological cycles and behaviors, including the sleep-wake cycle, positive and negative aspects of sentiment, etc. are controlled by circadian rhythms (54). The disruption of the circadian rhythm environment had been shown to affect sentiment and increase the chance of mental illnesses (55). Compared with healthy controls, the circadian rhythm regulation mechanism has fewer effects on positive emotion, but it has strong effects on negative emotion (54). Another study showed that shift work is associated with bad moods and that shift workers have a higher chance of becoming depressed (56). Major life events, including divorce, death, shift work, childbirth and others affect daily lifestyle, which usually influences the circadian system; a disrupted circadian system may lead to sleep disorders, negative emotions and psychological distress (57). This suggested that the circadian rhythm regulation system played an important role in sleep disorders, coping with mood and psychological distress. The findings revealed that coping styles are linked to psychological distress and that sleep quality had a regulatory effect. Coping styles, defined as a person's habitual inclination to solve difficulties or a common method for dealing with stressors, were found to be reasonably consistent. Psychological distress can be decreased to some extent by adopting steps to improve the sleep quality of psychiatric nurses. For the protection from perceived stress, good sleep quality is a valuable resource. Psychological distress and mental health can be alleviated by improving sleep quality (58). Nursing managers can improve the sleep quality of psychiatric nurses by providing reasonable work schedules and humanized care, adopting group intervention strategies such as mindfulness and encouraging them to use positive coping strategies to lessen psychological distress and enhance mental health.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, although this study has enrolled samples from six geographical regions in Shandong Province, which has geographical and economic advantages, this study is not nationally representative. Second, given the cross-sectional study design, researchers may be more susceptible to recollection bias, making it hard to infer a causal link from the findings. Finally, this study used a self-reported questionnaire, which may affect the results. In future studies, we will further consider a national longitudinal analysis of sleep quality, coping styles, and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses.

Conclusions

In summary, Psychological distress was detected in psychiatric nurses at 70.3%. Significant associations were found with the professional title and work shift but age, sex, marital status, education level, income, and working duration showed no such trends. Psychological distress correlated positively with the negative coping style, sleep quality, and all dimensions of sleep quality. Negative coping style and sleep quality were the predictors of psychological distress among psychiatric nurses. Sleep quality partially mediated the relationship between negative coping style and psychological distress among psychiatric nurses.

Implications

Following are the implications of the findings of this study: We examined psychological distress' relationship with sleep quality and negative coping styles among nurses in six tertiary psychiatric hospitals in Shandong Province, China. Our findings indicated that psychological distress was prevalent among 70.3% of the psychiatric nurses. Zou et al. reported that 85.5% of the nurses in general hospitals suffer from psychological distress (5). Dong et al. found that the incidence of sleep disorders among nurses in general hospitals was 63.9% (41). Previous research has shown that the levels of anxiety and depression reduce significantly upon interventions that include structured relaxation; attention and explanatory therapy, and stress management and resilience training programs (59). Therefore, to better guide the clinical practice of nurses, studies on relevant interventions are needed to improve their mental health. Sleep quality is the basic physiological need of the human body and is correlated with psychological distress. Nursing managers should be encouraged to pay attention to the sleep quality of nurses, and related treatments, including sleep relaxation therapy, mindful self-compassion training, kindness meditation therapy, and compassion focus therapy should be emphasized in clinical continuing education to improve the sleep quality of nurses, thus improving their psychological problems. Coping styles are means by which individuals deal with stressful situations and maintain psychological balance. Nursing managers are encouraged to undertake courses on negative emotion management and interpersonal communication therapy in continuing education and learning, to improve the ability of nurses to deal with negative events and adopt positive coping methods, thereby reducing the level of psychological distress. In the future, we will further examine the relationship between variables such as sleep quality, coping styles, and psychological distress in psychiatric nurses and analyze their mutual influence and the mechanism underlying their regulation. Through Balint group, group therapy, standardized interpersonal communication, and MBSR therapy, nurses can face negative events in life with a more positive attitude, focus on the problem, reduce bad mood, and improve the quality of their sleep, and ultimately improving the overall mental health. We hope that through our findings, the Chinese government and authorities worldwide should pay attention to the mental health of nursing professionals, particularly in specialized hospitals. In addition, to lower the frequency of psychological distress, mental health education should be expanded globally to increase the quality and efficacy of psychological therapies, and ultimately establish a positive and pleasant work environment for nurses worldwide.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

JW was in charge of the data analysis and writing. ZZ was in charge of the data review and language modification. YT was in charge of the data collection and data entry. RZ was in charge of the data analysis and data entry. QL was in charge of the data collection and study design. BW and QS were in charge of essential help. All authors designed this study and contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by Shandong Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan Project (2018WS296).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  52 in total

1.  Experiential avoidance as a generalized psychological vulnerability: comparisons with coping and emotion regulation strategies.

Authors:  Todd B Kashdan; Velma Barrios; John P Forsyth; Michael F Steger
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2006-09

2.  Stress Management and Resiliency Training (SMART) program among Department of Radiology faculty: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Amit Sood; Varun Sharma; Darrell R Schroeder; Brian Gorman
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.775

3.  CE: The potential effects of sleep loss on a nurse's health.

Authors:  Linda Eanes
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.220

4.  Associations between sleep quality and psychological distress in early adolescence.

Authors:  Daniel Jamieson; Denise A Beaudequin; Larisa T McLoughlin; Marcella J Parker; Jim Lagopoulos; Daniel F Hermens
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Ment Health       Date:  2020-11-18

5.  The association of mothers' and fathers' insomnia symptoms with school-aged children's sleep assessed by parent report and in-home sleep-electroencephalography.

Authors:  Natalie Urfer-Maurer; Rebekka Weidmann; Serge Brand; Edith Holsboer-Trachsler; Alexander Grob; Peter Weber; Sakari Lemola
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 6.  Impacts of shift work on sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  D B Boivin; P Boudreau
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2014-09-20

7.  The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.

Authors:  D J Buysse; C F Reynolds; T H Monk; S R Berman; D J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.

Authors:  R C Kessler; G Andrews; L J Colpe; E Hiripi; D K Mroczek; S L T Normand; E E Walters; A M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Mediating effect of social support on the association between functional disability and psychological distress in older adults in rural China: does age make a difference?

Authors:  Danjun Feng; Linqin Ji; Lingzhong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.