| Literature DB >> 36061123 |
Xinjie Zhang1, Canyang Zheng1, Zixin Lv1, Shaohua Xue1, Yuxuan Chen1, Yanru Liu1, Xirong Huang1, Guoqing Luo1, Xiaoyan Yang1,2,3, Ailing Dai1,2,3.
Abstract
Porcine parvovirus (PPV) is the primary cause of reproductive disorders in pigs. The porcine parvovirus 7 (PPV7) subtype was first identified in the United States in 2016. In this study, PPV7 was detected in different porcine samples, including serum, feces, saliva, and milk, from 69 pig farms in the Fujian and Guangdong regions of South China, and its coinfection with porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2), porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) was determined. Whole-genome sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and recombination analysis were performed on seven isolates, with each selected isolate originating from a different farm. There was a high rate of PPV7 positivity in blood, stool, and saliva but PPV7 DNA was absent from breast milk. The findings also showed that PPV7-positive samples had a high rate of coinfection with PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV. Real-time PCR was used to determine the viral copy numbers of PCV2, PCV3, PRRSV, and PPV7 in serum samples and to assess whether PPV7 affected PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV viral loads. Phylogenetic analysis showed that PPV7e and PPV7f were the most prevalent and widespread subtypes in the Fujian and Guangdong regions, respectively. While the PPV7a, PPV7b, PPV7c, and PPV7f subtypes were most prevalent in Fujian Province, PPV7a-e subtypes were prevalent in Guangdong, indicating that PPV7 has rich genetic diversity in these regions. A putative recombinant strain, 21FJ09, was identified using SimPlot and the Recombination Detection Program 4 software.Entities:
Keywords: coinfections; genotype; molecular characterization; porcine parvovirus 7; recombination
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061123 PMCID: PMC9428481 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.949764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Sample details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Qingyuan | 5/30 (2/3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Huizhou | 3/24 (1/2) | 0 (0) | 9/35 (1/1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Meizhou | 7/24 (4/4) | 2/24 (1/1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Shantou | 25/68 (3/3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Fujian | Longyan | 36/137 (16/24) | 4/30 (5/5) | 31/104 (7/7) | 15/107 (1/1) | 0/40 (1/1) |
| Sanming | 16/63 (5/11) | 0/21 (1/1) | 16/63 (3/3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Zhangzhou | 23/106 (6/17) | 3/32 (3/3) | 2/17 (1/1) | 23/111 (1/1) | 0/36 (1/1) | |
| Nanping | 6/48 (3/8) | 0/7 (1/1) | 7/40 (2/2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
The proportion of PPV7 positive samples in each region; the values in parentheses indicate the proportion of positive pig farms. All feces, saliva, and milk samples were collected from PPV7 positive farms.
Figure 1Boxplot comparison of the real-time PCR copy number of PPV7 with PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV, and scatterplots with the trends and 95% CI (dashed line) for the copy number of PPV7 with PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV. (A) Comparison of the real-time PCR copy number of PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV in POS-PPV7 and NEG-PPV7 serum samples. (B) Comparison of the real-time PCR copy number of PPV7 in POS-PCV2, NEG-PCV2, POS-PCV3, NEG-PCV3, POS-PRRSV, and NEG-PRRSV serum samples. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences are marked with an asterisk. (C) Scatterplots with the trends and 95% CI (dashed line) for the copy number of PPV7 with PCV2 (p = 0.0054), PCV3 (p < 0.0001) and PRRSV (p = 0.0044).
The PPV7 strains identified in this study.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21FJ02 | PPV7f | Serum | Longyan | ON462331 |
| 2 | 21FJ09 | PPV7a | Serum | Longyan | ON462332 |
| 3 | 21FJ10 | PPV7f | Serum | Zhangzhou | ON462333 |
| 4 | 21FJ12 | PPV7a | Serum | Nanping | ON462334 |
| 5 | 21FJ13 | PPV7c | Serum | Sanming | ON462335 |
| 6 | 21GD01 | PPV7d | Serum | Meizhou | ON462336 |
| 7 | 21GD02 | PPV7d | Serum | Shantou | ON462337 |
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of PPV7. The trees were constructed based on the NS1 (A), cap (B), and complete genome sequences (C) by the maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic method, using the General Time Reversible model. The analysis involved 128 nucleotide sequences, including seven sequences obtained from this study and 121 reference strains obtained from the NCBI database. The circles represent the seven strains from this study, the triangles represent the putative recombinant 21FJ09 strain and the hexagons represent the parental strains, GD291 and AH-PPV720178-1. The strains from Fujian and Guangdong are marked as red and green, respectively.
Figure 3SIMPLOT recombination analysis. Bootscanning analysis was performed using 21FJ09, GD291, AH-PPV720178-1, and 21FJ09 as query sequences, with a sliding window of 200 nt that moved in 20 nt steps.
Figure 4Base-by-base comparison of the recombination fragment of the 21FJ09 isolate and probable parents (GD291 and AH-PPV720178-1). The position of the potential breakpoint is bracketed by two vertical lines.