| Literature DB >> 36060996 |
Ivan Suneel1, Elizabeth Schwaiger1, Syeda Saniya Zehra1, Abia Nazim1.
Abstract
Background: Alcoholism is a growing problem in Pakistan. Problems related to alcoholism affects the family members especially children of alcoholics who are likely to have biased perceptions of parental practices which in turn affects their attachment patterns. Objective: To analyze the differences in perceptions of parental practices across three attachment styles namely avoidant, anxious/ambivalent, and secure attachments of the adults who are children of alcoholic parents. Method: The study is a correlational research design with a sample of 330 participants selected through purposive sampling technique. The participants were adults who are children of alcoholics from nuclear family systems, whose fathers were admitted in a rehabilitation center for the treatment of alcoholism for the second time.Entities:
Keywords: Adult children of alcoholics; Alcoholism; Attachment; Parental practices
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060996 PMCID: PMC9433682 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Demographic information of the sample.
| Variable | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 167 | 50.6 |
| Education | 55 | 16.7 |
Descriptive statistics of the study variables.
| Variable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment Style | ||||
| Secure | 110 (33.3) | |||
| Avoidant | 110 (33.3) | |||
| Anxious/Ambivalent | 110 (33.3) | |||
| EMBU | ||||
| Father OP | 11.07 (3.85) | 6 | 23 | |
| Father EW | 9.87 (1.74) | 9 | 31 | |
| Father R | 14.72 (5.87) | 6 | 24 | |
| Mother OP | 10.86 (2.80) | 6 | 18 | |
| Mother EW | 28.23 (4.89) | 9 | 36 | |
| Mother R | 9.36 (3.68) | 6 | 23 |
Note. EMBU = Egna Minnen Betriifende Upfostron; OP = Overprotective; EW = Emotional Warmth; R = Rejecting.
Correlations among EMBU subscales.
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. EMBU F OP | .015 | .654∗∗ | .627∗∗ | -.430∗∗ | .441∗∗ | |
| 2. EMBU F EW | .203∗∗ | -.296∗∗ | -.279∗∗ | -.247∗∗ | ||
| 3. EMBU F R | .448∗∗ | -.407∗∗ | .716∗∗ | |||
| 4. EMBU M OP | -.248∗∗ | .644∗∗ | ||||
| 5. EMBU M EW | -.190∗∗ | |||||
| 6. EMBU M R |
Note. EMBU = Egna Minnen Betriifende Upfostron; OP = Overprotective; EW = Emotional Warmth; R = Rejecting. ∗∗Correlation is significant at p < .01.
Results of tests of between subjects effects.
| Variable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EMBU F OP | 100.502 (2, 321) | <.001∗ | .385 |
| EMBU F EW | 4.188 (2, 321) | .016 | .025 |
| EMBU F R | 309.559 (2, 321) | <.001∗ | .659 |
| EMBU M OP | 22.141 (2, 321) | <.001∗ | .121 |
| EMBU M EW | 56.249 (2, 321) | <.001∗ | .260 |
| EMBU M R | 83.886 (2, 321) | <.001∗ | .343 |
Note. ∗Significant result based on Bonferroni adjusted significance level of p < .008.