| Literature DB >> 36060919 |
Hassan Farhadnejad1,2, Seyed Alireza Mortazavi1, Sanaz Jamshidfar3, Amir Rakhshani4, Hamidreza Motasadizadeh4, Yousef Fatahi4,5,6, Athar Mahdieh4, Behzad Darbasizadeh1.
Abstract
The main purpose of the present study was to fabricate mucoadhesive bio-nanocomposite hydrogels to prolong the drug retention time in the stomach. In these bio-nanocomposite hydrogels, chitosan (CH) was used as a bioadhesive matrix, montmorillonite (MMT) was applied to modulate the release rate, and tripolyphosphate (TPP) was the cross-linking agent. The test samples were analyzed via different methods such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Drug incorporation efficacy and mucoadhesive strength of these nanocomposite hydrogel beads were studied. Swelling and in vitro drug release behaviors of these bio-nanocomposite hydrogels were evaluated in simulated gastric fluid (SGF; pH 1.2). The optimized MMT-famotidine (FMT)/CH bio-nanocomposite hydrogels displayed a controllable and sustainable drug release profile with suitable mucoadhesion and prolonged retention time in the stomach. Thus, the results demonstrated that the fabricated mucoadhesive bio-nanocomposite hydrogels could remarkably increase the therapeutic efficacy and bioavailability of FMT by the oral route.Entities:
Keywords: Bio-nanocomposite Hydrogel; Drug Delivery; Gastroretention; Mucoadhesion
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060919 PMCID: PMC9420228 DOI: 10.5812/ijpr-127035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.962
Figure 1.The formation of spherical MMT-FMT/CH bio-nanocomposite hydrogels as gastroretentive/mucoadhesive drug delivery systems
Figure 2.Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy spectra of test samples
Figure 3.The results obtained from the XRD analysis of A, MMT nanoclay; and B, MMT-FMT particles
Figure 4.The incorporation of FMT molecules into the nano-space between layers of MMT nanoclay using an ion-exchange technique
Figure 5.The SEM images of TPP–cross-linked FMT/CH (A and C); MMT-FMT/CH bio-nanocomposite hydrogels (B and D); and the digital images of MMT-FMT/CH bio-nanocomposite hydrogels [wet (e) and dry (f)]
Figure 6.TGA curves of the samples
Figure 7.The swelling behavior of the test samples
Drug Encapsulation Efficiency (%) and Mucoadhesive Strength (g) of the Test Samples
| Sample Names | Drug Encapsulation Efficiency (%) | Mucoadhesive Strength (g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 37.6 ± 3.1 | 41.5 ± 4.2 |
|
| 57.2 ± 4.8 | 39.7 ± 3.3 |
|
| 67.8 ± 6.3 | 37.4 ± 3.8 |
|
| 84.5 ± 5.9 | 38.7 ± 2.9 |
Figure 8.The release profile of FMT from the FMT and MMT physical mixture, MMT-FMT particles, FMT/CH hydrogel, and MMT-FMT/CH bio-nanocomposites hydrogels
Kinetic Model Factors of MMT-FMT/CH Bio-nanocomposite Hydrogels
| Kinetic Model Parameters | MMT-FMT/CH Bio-nanocomposite Hydrogels |
|---|---|
|
| 0.62 |
|
| 0.99 |
|
| 0.97 |
|
| 0.95 |
Abbreviations: n, kinetic exponent; R2: regression coefficient.