| Literature DB >> 36060869 |
Weiwei Jiang1,2, Xi Wang3, Xuefeng Wu1.
Abstract
In order to effectively address or eliminate the impact of CO2 emissions, it is crucial to conduct a CO2 emissions evolution analysis using a green investment model. Ecological innovation helps to limit carbon dioxide emissions, which is crucial to resource distribution and effectively summarizes the regularity and innovation of the process of limiting carbon dioxide emissions. Under the condition of fully grasping the principles of low-carbon city development and related policy protection, find a suitable low-carbon city development model. This paper analyzes the impact of ecological innovation and green investment on carbon dioxide emission limitations by building a data analysis model. The results of the case analysis show that the impact of the green investment scale on Chinese carbon dioxide emission restrictions is an inverted U-shaped relationship. The scale of green investment, economic competition, and marketization of capital allocation has a negative impact on Chinese carbon dioxide emissions, while green investment and ecological innovation have a positive effect on the green and low-carbon development of the Chinese economy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060869 PMCID: PMC9436566 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3783985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Visual analysis of the impact of economic growth rate on carbon dioxide emissions.
Relationship between green investment and total factor productivity.
| Variable | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional innovation. economy | Green investment | Economic structure | Proportion of green investment | Proportion of ecological innovation | |
| LTech | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Fin | 0.023 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.26 |
| Edu | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| FDI | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
| Open | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Fiscal | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Abond | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.18 |
| Sargan test | 25.78 | 25.02 | 22.11 | 25.33 | 25.71 |
Relationship between green investment and industrial structure.
| Variable | The proportion of explained variables as the traditional economy | The proportion of explained variables as green investment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | |
| Traditional (17 economy) | Green investment | Traditional (17 economy) | Green investment | |
| LStruct | 0.33 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| Fin | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.003 | −0.01 |
| Fin2 | −0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| Consum | −0.13 | −0.11 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Labor | 0.00 (0.04) | 0.00 (0.12) | −0.002 | −0.001 |
| Fiscal | −0.02% | −0.03 | −0.01 (−1.36) | −0.002 (−0.33) |
| Edu | −0.20 | −0.22 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Abond | 0.29 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| Sargan test | 28.56 | 27.39 | 28.33 | 28.45 |
Relationship between green investment structure and industrial structure.
| Variable | The explanatory variable is the economic structure | Explanatory variable is the proportion of green investment | Explanatory variable is the proportion of ecological innovation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | Expression ( | |
| Proportion of the traditional economy | Proportion of green investment | Proportion of the traditional economy | Proportion of green investment | Proportion of the traditional economy | Proportion of green investment | |
| LStruct | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.94 |
| Fin | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.03 | −0.04 | −0.30 | 0.20 |
| Fin1 | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.01 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abond | 0.35 | 0.1071 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.25 |
| Sargan test | 27.22 | 27.21 | 29.12 | 28.86 | 27.18 | 28.34 |