| Literature DB >> 36060669 |
Jie Jiao1, Yeping Zhang2, Pengda Han3, Shuya Zhai4.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of intestinal flora in predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with refractory hypertension (RH).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060669 PMCID: PMC9433243 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7723105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Comparison of general information between the two groups.
| Data | MACCE group ( | No-MACCE group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 57.48 ± 9.64 | 55.87 ± 11.30 | 1.437 | 0.152 |
| Gender | 0.351 | 0.554 | ||
| Female | 88 (52.07) | 91 (48.92) | ||
| Male | 81 (47.93) | 95 (51.08) | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.70 ± 0.59 | 23.58 ± 0.67 | 1.783 | 0.075 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 114.58 ± 6.72 | 113.95 ± 5.24 | 0.990 | 0.323 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 153.84 ± 5.01 | 149.60 ± 5.31 | 7.718 | 0.001 |
| Duration of disease (years) | 7.92 ± 1.36 | 7.85 ± 1.42 | 0.473 | 0.636 |
| Diabetes | 0.679 | 0.410 | ||
| No | 146 (86.39) | 166 (89.25) | ||
| Yes | 23 (13.61) | 20 (10.75) | ||
| Hyperlipidemia | 0.733 | 0.392 | ||
| No | 110 (65.09) | 129 (69.35) | ||
| Yes | 59 (34.91) | 57 (30.65) | ||
| Smoking | 0.319 | 0.572 | ||
| No | 135 (79.88) | 144 (77.42) | ||
| Yes | 34 (20.12) | 42 (22.58) | ||
| Drinking | 0.307 | 0.580 | ||
| No | 141 (83.43) | 151 (81.18) | ||
| Yes | 28 (16.57) | 35 (18.82) | ||
| Chronic renal insufficiency | 1.387 | 0.239 | ||
| No | 158 (93.49) | 179 (96.24) | ||
| Yes | 11 (6.51) | 7 (3.76) | ||
| Medication history | ||||
| Calcium antagonists | 132 (78.11) | 152 (81.72) | 0.723 | 0.395 |
| Diuretics | 115 (68.05) | 123 (66.13) | 0.148 | 0.701 |
| Beta-blockers | 108 (63.91) | 115 (61.83) | 0.087 | 0.768 |
| ACEI/ARB | 161 (95.27) | 180 (96.77) | 0.532 | 0.466 |
Comparison of abundance of intestinal flora at the phylum level between the two groups (±s).
| Phylum | MACCE group ( | No-MACCE group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinomycetes | 3.61 ± 1.02 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 43.451 | 0.001 |
| Chlamydiae | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Unnamed virus | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.75 ± 0.21 | 20.113 | 0.001 |
| Bacteroidetes | 25.42 ± 8.35 | 26.30 ± 9.48 | 0.924 | 0.356 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 12.72 ± 4.11 | 2.49 ± 0.82 | 33.231 | 0.001 |
| Euryarchaeota | 0.86 ± 0.23 | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 1.344 | 0.180 |
| Phylum Firmicutes | 51.35 ± 12.26 | 53.11 ± 14.73 | 1.217 | 0.225 |
| Proteobacteria | 12.22 ± 3.54 | 11.73 ± 3.25 | 1.360 | 0.175 |
| Synergistetes | 2.20 ± 0.70 | 2.09 ± 0.68 | 1.501 | 0.134 |
| Fusobacteria | 0.37 ± 0.11 | 0.39 ± 0.12 | 1.632 | 0.104 |
Comparison for the abundance of intestinal flora at the species level between the two groups.
| Species | MACCE group ( | No-MACCE group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eubacterium eligens | 1.34 ± 0.40 | 2.58 ± 0.83 | 17.647 | 0.001 |
| Akkermansia muciniphila | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 10.24 ± 3.11 | 42.420 | 0.001 |
| Prevotella stercorea | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 3.87 ± 1.29 | 35.591 | 0.001 |
| Escherichia coli | 6.25 ± 2.18 | 1.60 ± 0.55 | 28.126 | 0.001 |
| Eubacterium rectale | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 7.93 ± 2.34 | 39.503 | 0.001 |
| Clostridium hathewayi | 2.88 ± 0.94 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 40.475 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcus gnavus | 2.07 ± 0.60 | 0.66 ± 0.21 | 30.089 | 0.001 |
Logistic regression equation analysis of RH complicated with MACCE.
| Influence factors |
| SE | Wald | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Systolic pressure | 2.458 | 0.659 | 13.907 | 11.676 | 1.835~74.293 | 0.001 |
| Actinomycetes | 1.847 | 0.512 | 13.009 | 6.339 | 1.148~35.002 | 0.001 |
| Unnamed virus | -1.485 | 0.455 | 10.646 | 0.227 | 0.105~0.489 | 0.001 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 2.616 | 0.688 | 14.456 | 13.678 | 2.194~85.277 | 0.001 |
| Eubacterium eligens | -0.846 | 0.236 | 12.845 | 0.429 | 0.258~0.714 | 0.001 |
| Akkermansia muciniphila | -1.322 | 0.414 | 10.199 | 0.267 | 0.078~0.911 | 0.001 |
| Prevotella stercorea | -0.680 | 0.203 | 11.206 | 0.507 | 0.394~0.652 | 0.001 |
| Escherichia coli | 2.579 | 0.732 | 12.409 | 13.178 | 4.662~37.251 | 0.001 |
| Eubacterium rectale | -0.995 | 0.279 | 12.713 | 0.370 | 0.163~0.839 | 0.001 |
| Clostridium Hathewayi | 2.682 | 0.505 | 28.196 | 14.607 | 3.522~60.584 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcus gnavus | 1.920 | 0.576 | 11.112 | 6.821 | 1.039~44.784 | 0.001 |
Figure 1ROC curves of intestinal flora-related indexes to predict MACCE.
Results of ROC analysis.
| Index | AUC | 95% CI | Cut-off value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinomycetes | 0.757 | 0.708~0.800 | 3.36 | 67.46 | 75.81 | 0.001 |
| Unnamed virus | 0.783 | 0.736~0.824 | 0.50 | 88.17 | 59.68 | 0.001 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.739 | 0.690~0.784 | 12.08 | 53.25 | 83.33 | 0.001 |
| Eubacterium eligens | 0.780 | 0.733~0.822 | 1.89 | 92.31 | 55.91 | 0.001 |
| Akkermansia muciniphila | 0.815 | 0.770~0.854 | 0.13 | 91.72 | 66.13 | 0.001 |
| Prevotella stercorea | 0.797 | 0.751~0.838 | 0.06 | 99.41 | 56.99 | 0.001 |
| Escherichia coli | 0.739 | 0.690~0.783 | 5.21 | 71.60 | 68.82 | 0.001 |
| Eubacterium rectale | 0.754 | 0.706~0.798 | 0.85 | 66.27 | 74.19 | 0.001 |
| Clostridium Hathewayi | 0.781 | 0.734~0.832 | 2.61 | 60.95 | 86.56 | 0.001 |
| Ruminococcus gnavus | 0.764 | 0.717~0.808 | 1.92 | 65.68 | 81.72 | 0.001 |
| Combination treatment | 0.926 | 0.894~0.951 | 88.76 | 84.41 | 0.001 |