| Literature DB >> 36060611 |
Patricia Concheiro-Moscoso1,2, Betania Groba1,2, Francisco José Martínez-Martínez1,3, María Del Carmen Miranda-Duro1,2, Laura Nieto-Riveiro1,2, Thais Pousada1,2, Javier Pereira1,2.
Abstract
Background: Lower quantity and poorer sleep quality are common in most older adults, especially for those who live in a nursing home. The use of wearable devices, which measure some parameters such as the sleep stages, could help to determine the influence of sleep quality in daily activity among nursing home residents. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the influence of sleep and its changes concerning the health status and daily activity of older people who lived in a nursing home, by monitoring the participants for a year with Xiaomi Mi Band 2.Entities:
Keywords: xiaomi mi smart band 2; Sleep; activities of daily life; aging; occupational therapy; participatory health; quality of life; wearable technology
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060611 PMCID: PMC9434673 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221121162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Digit Health ISSN: 2055-2076
Characteristics of participants
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Women | 17 (81%) |
| Age (years) | 86.38 ± 9.26 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 24.97 ± 4.59 |
| Widowed | 19 (90.5%) |
| Nursing-home residents | 18 (85.7%) |
| Cognitive statusa | |
| No cognitive decline | 3 (14.30%) |
| Very mild cognitive decline | 8 (38.1%) |
| Mild cognitive impairment | 10 (47.6%) |
| Health diagnosis | |
| Hypertension (I10)*
| 14 (66.7%) |
| Osteoporosis (M80-82)
| 14 (66.7%) |
| Medication | |
| Number | 6.67 ± 2.35 |
| Corticosteroids | 15 (71.4) |
Lobo MEC: Lobo mini-cognitive examination; ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems; GDS: Global Deterioration Scale.
Cognitive status was obtained by Lobo MEC and classified by Reisberg GDS.
Health conditions were grouped and classified into different types following the ICD-10.
Descriptive variables.
| Measure | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi Band 2 | |
| Sleep | |
| TST | 321.90 ± 97.61 |
| TST ≤7–8 h. (420–480 min) | 19 (90.47%) |
| Light sleep | 221.21 ± 81.49 |
| Deep sleep | 100.65 ± 33.60 |
| WASO | 39.87 ± 29.13 |
| Activity | |
| Steps | 1623.29 ± 2080.02 |
| Steps≤3000 daily steps | 16 (76.21%) |
| Assessment tools | |
| Lobo MCE≤23 | 12 (57.14%) |
| VAS EQ 5D-5L≤50 | 8 (38.09%) |
| Barthel≤60 | 11 (52.38%) |
| Tinetti≤24 | 17 (80.95%) |
| PSQI≤5 | 20 (95.23%) |
| Falls | |
| Average of falls | 1 ± 2 |
| Falls≤1 | 7 (33.3%) |
| Mobility aids | |
| Walker | 12 (57.1%) |
TST: total sleep time; WASO: wake after sleep onset; MCE: mini-cognitive examination; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Mixed model on sleep and activity associations.
| Variable | Value (Y) | St Error | Df | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 17.95 | 4.11 | 7657 | 4.36 | <0.001 |
| Days | 0.00067 | 0.0022 | 7657 | 0.29 | 0.765 |
| Total sleep time | 3.06 | 0.096 | 7657 | 31.61 | <0.001 |
Association between sleep and activity variables using the Granger test.
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| Activity-TST | 139.21 | <0.001 |
| Activity-Light/deep sleep | 0.0202 | 0.88 |
| Activity-WASO/TST | 2.36 | 0.12 |
TST: total sleep time; WASO: wake after sleep onset.
Spearman correlations between the quantity of sleep parameters and assessment tools.
| Variables | Variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TST | Light sleep | Deep sleep | WASO | |
| EQ 5D-5L | 0.637*** | 0.709*** | 0.177 | −0.684*** |
| Lobo MCE | 0.753*** | 0.724*** | 0.591*** | −0.720*** |
| Barthel index | 0.866*** | 0.874*** | 0.507* | −0.806*** |
| Tinetti | 0.926*** | 0.935*** | 0.472* | −0.822*** |
| PSQI | −0.508*** | −0.860*** | −0.415 | 0.817*** |
TST: total sleep time; MCE: mini-cognitive examination; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; WASO: wake after sleep onset.
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Spearman correlations between the quality of sleep parameters and assessment tools.
| Variables | Variables | |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep period (Light/deep sleep) | WASO/(Light + Deep sleep) | |
| EQ 5D-5L | 0.274 | −0.759*** |
| Lobo MCE | 0.431 | −0.759*** |
| Barthel index | 0.409 | −0.886*** |
| Tinetti | 0.481* | −0.907*** |
| PSQI | −0.491* | 0.877*** |
MCE: mini-cognitive examination; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Spearman correlation between environmental factors and sleep parameters of participants.
| Variables | Variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TST | Light sleep | Deep sleep | WASO | |
| Temperature | 0.601*** | 0.650*** | 0.302*** | 0.274*** |
| Humidity | −0.489*** | −0.472*** | −0.352*** | −0.150*** |
| Rain (l/m2) | −0.350** | −0.327*** | −0.296*** | −0.134* |
| Hours of sun | 0.507*** | 0.489*** | 0.350*** | 0.154** |
TST: total sleep time; WASO: wake after sleep onset.
***p < 0.0001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.
Associations between the passage of time and assessment tools.
| Variable | Pre
| Postb (Mean ± SD) | IC 95% |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQ 5D-5L | 68.42 ± 14.84 | 56.66 ± 15.35 | 0.66–0.91 | 5.31 | <0.001 | 0.79 |
| MCE | 25.33 ± 3.56 | 22.66 ± 4.55 | 0.78–0.90 | 5.25 | <0.001 | 0.84 |
| Barthel index | 72.85 ± 26.24 | 62.38 ± 27.36 | 0.64–0.85 | 4.79 | <0.001 | 0.75 |
| Tinetti | 17.80 ± 8.62 | 15.66 ± 8.76 | 0.63–0.84 | 4.65 | <0.001 | 0.73 |
| PSQI | 9.14 ± 2.74 | 12.04 ± 4.52 | −0.90−0.74 | -inf. | <0.001 | −0.82 |
MCE: mini-cognitive examination; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Pre scales
Post scales.
Figure 1.Graphical representations of the total sleep time (TST) (a) and the awake time (b) of the participants during the study.
Figure 2.Graphical representations of the sleep quality (awake total/total sleep) (a); (light/deep sleep) (b) of the participants during the study.
Figure 3.Graphical representation of the daily steps of the participants during the study.
Assessment tools.
| Assessment tool | Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Lobo mini-cognitive examination | The participants' cognitive status was evaluated using
the Lobo MCE, a brief test used to detect the existence
of cognitive impairment
| A total score between 0 and 23 indicates the presence of
cognitive impairment, while a total score between 23 and
35 suggests mild cognitive impairment or absence
|
| EuroQol 5D-5L | The participants' perception of the quality of life and
health status was analysed using the EQ 5D-5L scale
| Its score is based on five points assigned to each of
the dimensions according to the severity level
(1 = Absence of problems, 5 = Presence of severe
problems) that provide a profile (i.e.,12332) on health status
|
| Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index | This hetero-administrated tool allows measuring the
performance in ADLs
| It values the level of independence in some daily
activities and has a range of total scores between
0–100, with 0 the maximum dependence and 100 the maximum
independence. The total scores are interpreted as
follows: <20 (total dependence), 21–60 (severe
dependence), 61–90 (moderate dependence), 91–99 (mild
dependence), 100 (independence/90 if the person is wheelchair)
|
| Tinetti scale | This tool assesses the person's gait and balance. It is used to detect the risk of falling. | A higher score indicates a higher functionality, and a
lower score reflects the possibility of fall risk
|
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index | The PSQI assesses sleep quality. Specifically, it has 19
items associated with quantity, quality, duration,
latency, and sleep efficiency
| The total score of the PSQI scale is the result of
adding seven components, rated from 0 to 3. The
resulting score ranges from 0 to 21, a total score of 0
indicates no sleep difficulties, and a score of 21 means
severe difficulties in all sleep areas, so the higher
score, the worse sleep quality
|
MCE: mini-cognitive examination; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; GDS: Global Deterioration Scale; ADL: activities of daily living.