| Literature DB >> 36060474 |
Haibin Wang1,2,3, Chen Zong1,2,3, Aimei Bai1,2,3, Shuilin Yuan1,2,3, Yan Li1,2,3, Zhanghong Yu1,2,3, Ruiping Tian1, Tongkun Liu1,2,3, Xilin Hou1,2,3, Ying Li1,2,3.
Abstract
Sesquiterpenes are important defensive secondary metabolites and aroma components. However, limited information is available on the mechanism of sesquiterpene formation and composition in the non-heading Chinese cabbage (NHCC) leaf. Therefore, headspace solid-phase microextraction/gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) combined with transcriptome analysis was used to study the mechanism of volatile organic compound formation. A total of 26 volatile organic compounds were identified in two NHCC cultivars 'SZQ' and 'XQC' and their F1 hybrids. Among these, sesquiterpene β-caryophyllene was identified only in 'XQC' and F1. Five genes encoding caryophyllene synthase were identified. The candidate β-caryophyllene synthase genes BcTPSa11 and BcTPSa21 had high expression levels only in 'XQC' and F1. In addition, several transcription factors of MYB-related, MYB, bHLH, and AP2/ERF families were identified by co-expression, suggesting that they regulate β-caryophyllene biosynthesis. Our results provide a molecular basis for sesquiterpene biosynthesis as well as insights into the regulatory network of β-caryophyllene in NHCC.Entities:
Keywords: HS-SPME-GC/MS; Non-heading Chinese cabbage; Transcriptome analysis; β-Caryophyllene
Year: 2022 PMID: 36060474 PMCID: PMC9428917 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem (Oxf) ISSN: 2666-5662
Fig. 1Collection of released volatiles and GC–MS analysis of Brassica campestris. (A) In-kind diagram and principal diagram of a collection of released volatiles. (B) In-kind diagram and principal diagram of desorption and enrichment device with nitrogen blowing instrument. (C) Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) system and GC–MS analysis of B. campestris. The collection tube was loaded with Tenax (200 mg) for real-time collection during GC–MS (n = 1).
Fig. 2GC–MS analysis of products in Brassica campestris leaves. (A) GC–MS analysis of VOCs in ‘XQC’ leaves at 20, 40, and 60 days. (B) GC–MS analysis of VOCs in ‘XQC’ leaves after MeJA treatment. (C) GC–MS analysis of VOCs in F1 hybrids leaves after MeJA treatment. (D) Types and characteristics of the three study materials. (E) BCP content of different samples.
Fig. 4Phylogenetic relationships of BCP proteins. (A) Four groups of TPSa genes. (B) Phylogenetic tree representing relationships among BCP genes from twelve species.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure, and classification of BcTPSa genes. (A) Phylogeny of putative full-length TPS genes from eight sequenced plant genomes. (B) Phylogenetic relationships and gene structure in TPSa genes from Brassica campestris. (C) Expression of terpene biosynthesis genes in ‘XQC’ (left), ‘SZQ’ (middle), and F1 hybrids (right).
Fig. 5Analysis of terpene biosynthetic pathway genes. (A) Terpene synthases characterized in this study are shown in bold. At, Arabidopsis thaliana; CPP, ent-copalyl diphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; GFPP, geranylfarnesyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; TPS, terpene synthase. (B) Heatmap generated using correlation coefficients between TPM values of terpene biosynthetic pathway genes and relative BCP content listed in Table S5. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.
Fig. 6Putative regulation of TPSa. (A) Putative regulation in F1 hybrids. (B) Putative regulation in ‘XQC’. (C) Nuclear localization of BcERF23, BcMYB122, and BcMYC2 in tobacco leaf cells. (D) Analysis of the promoter activity of BcERF23, BcMYB122, and BcMYC2 in tobacco leaves.