Literature DB >> 36059968

Changes in serum metabolomics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and effect of approved antifibrotic medication.

Benjamin Seeliger1, Alfonso Carleo1, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia2, Jan Fuge1, Ana Montes-Warboys3, Sven Schuchardt4, Maria Molina-Molina3,5, Antje Prasse1,4.   

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with significant mortality and morbidity. Approval of antifibrotic therapy has ameliorated disease progression, but therapy response is heterogeneous and to date, adequate biomarkers predicting therapy response are lacking. In recent years metabolomic technology has improved and is broadly applied in cancer research thus enabling its use in other fields. Recently both aberrant metabolic and lipidomic pathways have been described to influence profibrotic responses. We thus aimed to characterize the metabolomic and lipidomic changes between IPF and healthy volunteers (HV) and analyze metabolomic changes following treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone. We collected serial serum samples from two IPF cohorts from Germany (n = 122) and Spain (n = 21) and additionally age-matched healthy volunteers (n = 16). Metabolomic analysis of 630 metabolites covering 14 small molecule and 12 different lipid classes was carried out using flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry for lipids and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for small molecules. Levels were correlated with survival and disease severity. We identified 109 deregulated analytes in IPF compared to HV in cohort 1 and 112 deregulated analytes in cohort 2. Metabolites which were up-regulated in both cohorts were mainly triglycerides while the main class of down-regulated metabolites were phosphatidylcholines. Only a minority of de-regulated analytes were small molecules. Triglyceride subclasses were inversely correlated with baseline disease severity (GAP-score) and a clinical compound endpoint of lung function decline or death. No changes in the metabolic profiles were observed following treatment with pirfenidone. Nintedanib treatment induced up-regulation of triglycerides and phosphatidylcholines. Patients in whom an increase in these metabolites was observed showed a trend towards better survival using the 2-years composite endpoint (HR 2.46, p = 0.06). In conclusion, we report major changes in metabolites in two independent cohorts testing a large number of patients. Specific lipidic metabolite signatures may serve as biomarkers for disease progression or favorable treatment response to nintedanib.
Copyright © 2022 Seeliger, Carleo, Wendel-Garcia, Fuge, Montes-Warboys, Schuchardt, Molina-Molina and Prasse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IPF; antifibrotic; fibrosis; lipidome; metabolome

Year:  2022        PMID: 36059968      PMCID: PMC9428132          DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.837680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Pharmacol        ISSN: 1663-9812            Impact factor:   5.988


1 Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal disease with a mean survival time of 3–5 years (Lederer and Martinez, 2018). Two medical compounds have been approved for treatment of IPF. Pirfenidone and nintedanib attenuate the mean decline in forced vital capacity significantly to a similar extent (King et al., 2014; Richeldi et al., 2014; Raghu et al., 2015). However, effect of treatment is not equal across patients. Some patients appear to benefit more, while others rapidly decline despite receiving adequate antifibrotic therapy. While nintedanib acts by inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FDG) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), synergistically leading to downregulation of fibrosis associated pathways (Hostettler et al., 2014; Roach et al., 2021), the distinct mode of action for pirfenidone for inhibition of fibrosis is still insufficiently understood (Conte et al., 2014; Epstein Shochet et al., 2018; Jin et al., 2019; Ruwanpura et al., 2020). There is currently no set of biomarkers available capable of gauging the therapeutic efficacy of nintedanib or pirfenidone (Jee et al., 2019). The technique of mass spectrometry based metabolome profiling has significantly improved during the last decade with metabolome measurements becoming increasingly robust and reproducible (Yang et al., 2019). The technique was frequently used in cancer research since various cancers induce vast metabolic dysregulation (Schmidt et al., 2021). In contrast to regular cells, proliferating cancer cells have a high demand for energy supply and use glycolysis even in normoxic conditions (Madama et al., 2021). Many therapeutics used in oncology alter cellular metabolism and thereby interfere with cancer cell proliferation. In future, changes in metabolome induced by drugs may serve as biomarker to monitor treatment efficacy (Chung and Griffiths, 2007). Recently the involvement of aberrant metabolic and lipid pathways have been implicated to affect IPF pathophysiology. Altered metabolism of the amino acids glycine, glutamine and arginine and dysregulated glycolysis was shown to promote profibrotic phenotypes via TGF-ß dependent pathways (Zhao et al., 2017; Gaugg et al., 2019; Roque and Romero, 2021). For lipids, increased levels of long-chain and medium chain fatty acids have been reported in IPF lungs and macrophage reprogramming with increased fatty acid beta oxidation have been described. (Mamazhakypov et al., 2019; Tedesco et al., 2019; Roque and Romero, 2021). Sphingolipids and lysophsphatidic acid (LPA) as other lipids play a part in many pathophysiological processes and were particularly associated with fibrotic processes (Shea and Tager, 2012; Pyne et al., 2013). With most evidence derived from animal studies, smaller analysis involving broad circulating metabolomic and lipidomic profiles from IPF patients showed deregulated profiles (Zhao et al., 2017; Nambiar et al., 2021a; Nambiar et al., 2021b). The impact and correlation of serum metabolomic profiles remains insufficiently investigated. In the context of these recent findings, we got interested in the metabolome of IPF patients and whether treatment with approved antifibrotic medication is capable of reversing metabolic changes or predicting therapy response. In order to address these questions, we performed serial serum metabolomic assays in IPF patients and healthy volunteers as comparators and correlated disease progression and severity.

2 Patients and methods

2.1 Patient and sample selection and study design

For this study we retrospectively selected patients who had a confident diagnosis of IPF in accordance with the practice guidelines issued by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) (Raghu et al., 2018) and were started on antifibrotic therapy with either nintedanib or pirfenidone at Hannover Medical School (Germany) as an exploration cohort. A further validation cohort of IPF patients was derived from the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge (Spain). Additionally, age-matched healthy volunteers were screened for pulmonary abnormalities by interview, physical examination and routine laboratory. For IPF patients, we collected baseline and follow-up data regarding demographics, pulmonary function tests and diffusion-capacity using a body plethysmograph as per ATS/ERS guidelines (Graham et al., 2019) and the gender-age-physiology (GAP) score and index (taking into account forced vital capacity (FVC), single breath diffusing capacity for the lung for carbon monoxide (SB-DLCO), age and gender (Ley et al., 2012). The GAP index has been validated as a prediction tool for mortality in IPF patients but is often used as a surrogate for disease severity (Robbie et al., 2017). The study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients provided written informed consent, and collection of bio-samples was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000017 and DRKS00000620). The respective institutional review boards approved of the bio-sampling (Freiburg 47/06 10 March 2006, Hannover, #2923–2015 and #2516–2014, 2 Nov 2015). Based on a smaller pilot study (data not shown) we estimated a significantly regulated proportion of metabolites at about 15%. Using the maximum number of targeted metabolites of the MetSizeR package (Nyamundanda et al., 2013; Billoir et al., 2015), an false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 and a minimum sample size of at least n = 10 and PPCA model, we calculated a necessary minimum group size of n = 16 per group (Supplementary Figure S1). Groups were considered as nintedanib and pirfenidone treated IPF patients (with a pre-antifibrotic and post-antifibrotic sub-group) and healthy volunteers (HV). We increased the discovery group size (IPF and HV patients) to increase statistical power to detect pathway regulation while keeping the confirmation cohort around the minimal needed sample size with n = 21 patients.

2.2 Sample preparation for metabolic/lipidomic analysis

Serum samples were collected prior to initiation of antifibrotic therapy and at follow-up between 2 and 6 months after treatment start (Figure 1A). Blood samples were rested for 20 min with subsequent centrifugation. The samples were aliquoted and stored at -80°C until performance of the metabolomic studies as recommended by published protocols (Beckonert et al., 2007).
FIGURE 1

Flowchart for sample and clinical data acquisition (A) and metabolome measurement, data processing and statistical analysis (B).

Flowchart for sample and clinical data acquisition (A) and metabolome measurement, data processing and statistical analysis (B). Serum metabolites were analyzed using an SCIEX 5500 QTrap mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Darmstadt, Germany) with use of the MxP Quant 500 kit (Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria) as per manufacturer’s protocol (https://biocrates.com/mxp-quant-500-kit, accessed 14 Dec 2021) using 10 µl of the sample as previously described (Ringseis et al., 2021) with details in the supplementary material. An overview of the study flow is shown in Figure 1B.

2.3 Data analysis

Following metabolite measurements, metabolites with a measurement of >30% below the lower limit of detection were excluded from further analysis since high missingness limits the validity of data imputation (Faquih et al., 2020). For the remaining metabolites, values below the lower limit of detection were imputed using a k-nearest neighbor with k = 10 imputation steps on observations with variable pre-selection method (Faquih et al., 2020) using the provided R function by Faquih et al. (Faquih, 2020) assuming data to be missing completely at random. Homogeneity after imputation was visually ascertained. For patient characteristics, categorical data was expressed as number (percentage) and compared via Chi2 test and continuous data was expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) and compared via rank-sum-test. A two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Deregulation of metabolites between HV and IPF patients (at baseline) and changes following antifibrotic therapy (post vs. pre) were calculated using the R limma package (Ritchie et al., 2015) with pair-wise comparison and adjustment for multiple comparison using the FDR with an FDR <0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Heatmaps of deregulated metabolite sets were produced using the R pheatmap package with scaling and centering (to a mean of 0 with a variance of 1). Hierarchical clustering using Euclidean distances were applied to rows and columns (ward.D method). To conduct an enrichment and overrepresentation pathway analysis of the deregulated analytes, KEGG IDs were retrieved from the annotation tables provided by Biocrates Life Sciences AG and analyzed via MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (Pang et al., 2021). Principal component analysis was performed using the deregulated analytes between IPF and healthy volunteers using the R prcomp package and were visualized using the pca3d package. Baseline metabolite concentrations were correlated with baseline GAP index and annualized FVC decline during follow-up calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. To analyze impact on outcome, a composite endpoint including death, FVC decline of ≥10% from baseline or DLCO decline of ≥15% was calculated. Baseline metabolite concentrations in IPF patients were dichotomized by median and hazard ratios (HR) for the composite endpoint were calculated via cox-regression modeling using the metabolite median and GAP index. Identified hierarchical clusters from deregulated analytes following antifibrotic therapy were also analyzed with respect to the composite endpoint using the same cox-regression model.

3 Results

3.1 Patient cohorts

In the first cohort from Germany, 122 patients with IPF and 16 healthy volunteers of similar age (median age 65 years; 38% female) were included in the study (Table 1). Median age was 72 years in IPF vs. 65 years (HV) with a median FVC of 68% of predicted at time of initiation of antifibrotic therapy (55% nintedanib, 45% pirfenidone).
TABLE 1

Demographics of study cohorts at start of antifibrotic therapy.

CharacteristicsHealthy volunteers (n = 16)IPF cohort 1 (n = 122)IPF Cohort 2 (n = 21) p-value (Cohort 1 vs. Cohort 2)
Antifibrotic treatment, n (% of IPF)-122 (100)21 (100)
 Nintedanib-67 (55)15 (71)
 Pirfenidone-55 (45)6 (29)
Age (years), median (IQR)65 (61–73)a 72 (65–76)65 (62–73)0.042
Female gender, n (%)6 (38)27 (22)2 (10)0.193
Forced vital capacity at baseline (% predicted), median (IQR)118 (105–132)68 (57–80)83 (72–94)<0.001
GAP Index-0.001
 I34 (28)12 (67)
 II65 (53)6 (33)
 III23 (19)-
Comorbidities, n (%)-
 Coronary artery disease38 (31)9 (42)0.400
 Diabetes mellitus26 (21)7 (33)0.302
 Arterial Hypertension47 (38.5)13 (62)0.080
 Chronic kidney disease5 (4)00.328
 Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease2 (10)12 (10)0.890
Previous smoking history73 (60)15 (71)0.513

GAP, Gender; Age, and Physiology index; IQR, interquartile range; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Kruskal Wallis test between healthy volunteers and IPF, cohorts p = 0.023.

Demographics of study cohorts at start of antifibrotic therapy. GAP, Gender; Age, and Physiology index; IQR, interquartile range; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Kruskal Wallis test between healthy volunteers and IPF, cohorts p = 0.023. In the second cohort from Spain, 21 patients with IPF were included (median age 65 years, median baseline FVC 83% of predicted). The majority was started on nintedanib (71%) and 29% on pirfenidone. Notably, the overall disease severity measured by GAP score/index was higher in the first cohort (p < 0.001) while the comorbidity profile was similar.

3.2 Metabolite/lipid detection

In the first cohort, a total of 262 samples were measured. After discarding samples with >30% values below the lower limit of detection, a total of 466 analytes (393 lipids; 73 small molecules) were considered for further analysis, consisting of 12 lipid and 13 small molecule classes. In the second cohort, a total of 42 samples were measured with a total of 451 considered analytes (377 lipids; 74 small molecules). The dataset of cohort 1 and 2 is available online (Seeliger et al., 2022).

3.3 Deregulated analytes between healthy volunteers and idiopathic fibrosis patients

In a first step, samples from IPF patients in the first cohort before initiation of antifibrotic therapy were compared to healthy volunteers. For small molecules, a total of 12 analytes were significantly down-regulated in IPF (defined as FDR <0.05) and 4 were up-regulated (Supplementary Table S1; Figure 2A). For lipids, there were 32 analytes down-regulated and 61 up-regulated (Supplementary Table S1, Figure 2B).
FIGURE 2

Comparison of metabolite differential abundance between patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and healthy volunteers. Log2-Fold changes were plotted against -log10 (p-value) of cohort 1 vs. IPF for small molecules (A) and lipids (B) as volcano-plots with numbers of significantly (FDR<0.05) up or down-regulated analytes indicated. Deregulated analytes were scaled and plotted as a 3 days principal component analysis with high lighting of IPF vs. healthy volunteers (HV) clusters (C). De-regulated analytes are plotted as a heatmap with hierarchical clustering of analytes (row-wise) and visualization of abundance by Z-score (D). KEGG IDs (small molecules) or compound names (lipids) were analyzed for pathway enrichment with resulting enrichment ratios and p-values plotted for small molecule pathways (E) and lipid pathways (F). The overlap between de-regulated analytes from the IPF cohort 1 and cohort 2 are shown as Venn diagram in (G) and (H) with a list of common de-regulated analytes.

Comparison of metabolite differential abundance between patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and healthy volunteers. Log2-Fold changes were plotted against -log10 (p-value) of cohort 1 vs. IPF for small molecules (A) and lipids (B) as volcano-plots with numbers of significantly (FDR<0.05) up or down-regulated analytes indicated. Deregulated analytes were scaled and plotted as a 3 days principal component analysis with high lighting of IPF vs. healthy volunteers (HV) clusters (C). De-regulated analytes are plotted as a heatmap with hierarchical clustering of analytes (row-wise) and visualization of abundance by Z-score (D). KEGG IDs (small molecules) or compound names (lipids) were analyzed for pathway enrichment with resulting enrichment ratios and p-values plotted for small molecule pathways (E) and lipid pathways (F). The overlap between de-regulated analytes from the IPF cohort 1 and cohort 2 are shown as Venn diagram in (G) and (H) with a list of common de-regulated analytes. On the basis of the de-regulated analytes, clear discrimination between HV and IPF patients was possible by principal component analysis (Figure 2C). The differential regulation of lipid and small molecule subclasses is shown in the heatmap (Figure 2D). Foremost, triglycerides were upregulated in IPF while lysophosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylcholines were down-regulated. The enriched lipid subclasses are shown in Figure 2E. Enrichment analysis of small molecules using KEGG IDs showed regulation of Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, Valin-leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis and d-Glutamine and d-Glutamate metabolism (Figure 2F). To validate these findings, we compared the IPF patients from cohort 2 with the HVs and found similar results (51 down-regulated; 61 up-regulated) with significant overlap (Supplementary Table S2, in particular for the above-mentioned regulated lipid classes (Figures 2G,H). Notably, only three of these regulated analytes were significantly regulated by gender (Leucine, Betaine and Sphingomyelin C18:0).

3.4 Correlation of analytes with clinical features and survival (IPF cohort 1)

We calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients between the baseline GAP points (which are used to calculate the GAP index) and found an FDR corrected significant correlation in 94 metabolites (Supplementary Table S3). Nintety-one of 97 correlated analytes were lipids (97%) of which the majority were triglycerides (79/94, 87%), Lysophosphatidylcholines and Diglycerides. For lipids, the correlation was always negative, meaning a higher baseline lipid concentration was associated with fewer GAP points (indicating overall better performance status and prognosis). Of note, no significant correlation between annualized decline of forced vital capacity was found for any of the analytes. We then dichotomized the baseline analyte concentration by the median of the IPF cohort 1 and fitted a cox-regression model for the median cut-off for each analyte adjusting for age and baseline FVC and gender. There were 16 significant analytes on cox-regression, again with the majority being lipids (Table 2). Seven analytes were both significantly correlated with survival (Figure 3A) and baseline GAP points (Figure 3B), of which 5 were triglycerides, 1 diacylglyceride (Diacylglyceride (16:0/16:1) and one small molecule (Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate [DHEAS]). For all analytes, below-median analyte concentrations were associated with worse survival in IPF patients.
TABLE 2

List of analytes significantly associated with the 2 years composite endpoint of FVC decline >10%, DLCO decline >15% or death.

AnalyteAdj. Hazard RatioAdj. p-ValueClass
Diacylglyceride (16:0_16:1)0.510.010Diglycerides
Diacylglyceride (18:1_18:3)1.730.041Diglycerides
Octadecenoic acid0.540.018Fatty acids
Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate0.570.031Hormones and related
Lysophosphatidylcholine a C18:00.480.006Lysophosphatidylcholines
Lysophosphatidylcholine a C16:10.520.013Lysophosphatidylcholines
Hypoxanthine0.600.044Nucleobases and related
Phosphatidylcholine ae C42:51.740.036Phosphatidylcholines
Phosphatidylcholine ae C44:61.700.039Phosphatidylcholines
Triacylglyceride (16:1_34:1)0.500.007Triglycerides
Triacylglyceride (16:1_32:0)0.520.013Triglycerides
Triacylglyceride (16:1_34:0)0.570.028Triglycerides
Triacylglyceride (16:1_34:3)0.580.038Triglycerides
Triacylglyceride (16:1_32:2)0.590.038Triglycerides
Triacylglyceride (17:1_34:1)0.600.043Triglycerides
Choline0.510.010Vitamins and cofactors
FIGURE 3

Metabolites and lipids both associated with survival/composite endpoint and baseline GAP score. Kaplan-Meier curves with adjusted hazard ratios and p-values for the 7 analytes which were significantly associated with both the 2-years composite endpoint when dichotomized by median and also with Gender, Age, and Physiology (GAP) score at baseline (A). Log10 transformed analyte abundance was plotted against the resulting GAP indices at baseline as box-jitter-plots with associated Person correlation coefficients (between abundance and GAP score) and false discovery rate (B). All IPF patients of cohort 1 were included in the analysis (n = 122).

List of analytes significantly associated with the 2 years composite endpoint of FVC decline >10%, DLCO decline >15% or death. Metabolites and lipids both associated with survival/composite endpoint and baseline GAP score. Kaplan-Meier curves with adjusted hazard ratios and p-values for the 7 analytes which were significantly associated with both the 2-years composite endpoint when dichotomized by median and also with Gender, Age, and Physiology (GAP) score at baseline (A). Log10 transformed analyte abundance was plotted against the resulting GAP indices at baseline as box-jitter-plots with associated Person correlation coefficients (between abundance and GAP score) and false discovery rate (B). All IPF patients of cohort 1 were included in the analysis (n = 122).

3.5 Metabolite/lipid changes following antifibrotic therapy

Following antifibrotic therapy of median 8 (5–16) weeks, another set of serum samples were collected and remeasured. Interestingly, we did not observe any deregulated analytes following treatment with pirfenidone in both cohorts. Following treatment with nintedanib in the first IPF cohort, there were 38 up-regulated analytes and 1 down-regulated analyte, all of which were lipids (33 triglycerides, 5 phosphatidylcholines and 1 acylcarnitine (Supplementary Table S4, Figure 4A). In the second cohort there were 13 up-regulated analytes and 1 down-regulated analyte (Supplementary Table S4, Figure 4B), but there was no overlap between the deregulated analytes between the cohorts (Figure 4C). Also, only one of the deregulated analytes following nintedanib treatment was mutually deregulated between IPF at baseline and HV (Phosphatidylcholine ae C34:3).
FIGURE 4

Changes in longitudinal analysis before vs. after initiation of antifibrotic treatment with nintedanib. Log2-Fold changes were plotted against -log10 (p-value) of cohort 1 (A) and cohort 2 (B) as volcano-plots with numbers of significantly (FDR<0.05) up or down-regulated analytes indicated (sample after treatment vs. baseline). The deregulated analytes in both cohorts are shown in (C), with no overlap between the cohorts. Delta-values (sample after treatment vs. baseline) of cohort 1 were calculated per patient and changes between the de-regulated analytes were plotted via heat-map with hierarchical clustering (ward.D method) (D). The resulting patient clusters were then compared via Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted cox-regression modelling (for GAP-index) (E).

Changes in longitudinal analysis before vs. after initiation of antifibrotic treatment with nintedanib. Log2-Fold changes were plotted against -log10 (p-value) of cohort 1 (A) and cohort 2 (B) as volcano-plots with numbers of significantly (FDR<0.05) up or down-regulated analytes indicated (sample after treatment vs. baseline). The deregulated analytes in both cohorts are shown in (C), with no overlap between the cohorts. Delta-values (sample after treatment vs. baseline) of cohort 1 were calculated per patient and changes between the de-regulated analytes were plotted via heat-map with hierarchical clustering (ward.D method) (D). The resulting patient clusters were then compared via Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted cox-regression modelling (for GAP-index) (E). We then calculated the changes in metabolite concentrations between baseline and the follow-up samples on the subset of analytes which were deregulated. Using hierarchical clustering, we found that the subgroup of patients who had an increase in deregulated analyte concentrations after nintedanib (mostly triglycerides) had a trend towards better survival, albeit missing statistical significance (HR 2.46 [CI 0.93–6.48]; p = 0.06) (Figures 4D,E).

3.6 Quality control

To account for compatibility, 30 samples from cohort 1 were re-measured alongside with cohort 2, with good correlation between the re-measured samples and a median ratio between analytes of 1.03 (IQR 0.9–1.18) (Supplementary Figure S2).

4 Discussion

Recent data from the cancer field and pulmonary fibrosis suggest a major role of metabolomic changes in both disease pathogenesis and treatment. On this background we got interested in the metabolome of IPF patients and whether pirfenidone or nintedanib induce any metabolic changes. We comprehensively studied the metabolome and lipidome of two IPF cohorts comprising 143 patients and age-matched healthy volunteers. The serum metabolome of healthy volunteers differed considerably from IPF patients in both studied cohorts. One-hundred-nine of the 466 (23.4%) included analytes were differentially abundant in IPF in the first cohort. Compared to healthy volunteers we found 44 analytes downregulated and 65 analytes upregulated. Most impressively were the changes in the lipidome. Among the 44 downregulated metabolites in serum of IPF patients were 8 amino acids or amino acid related metabolites, 4 biogenic amines or hormones, but the majority of the significantly downregulated metabolites were lipids including 9 (20.5%) lysophosphatidylcholines, and 23 (52%) phosphatidylcholines. On the other hand, 65 metabolites were significantly upregulated and these were again mostly composed of lipids (94%) but with different subclasses. The majority of the up-regulated lipids were triglyceride (75%) and some were ceramides (8%), sphingomyelins or cholesteryl esters. A similar metabolome profile in IPF patients was also described by Yan et al., although the study cohort was substantially smaller and consisted only of 22 IPF patients (Yan et al., 2017). In addition, other studies reported also on changes in the metabolome of IPF patients but included only small cohorts consisting of less than 30 patients or no healthy controls and without serial measurements (Rindlisbacher et al., 2018; Nambiar et al., 2021a; Nambiar et al., 2021b). In line with other reports, we did not find major changes in metabolome associated with age or gender. Thus, we observed vast changes in the metabolome and lipidome of IPF patients. Changes in metabolome are highly disease specific and were reported to serve as robust biomarkers (Trezzi et al., 2015). The finding of multiple different triglycerides upregulated in IPF attracted our attention. Tryglycerides are abundant circulating lipids and are stored in droplets formed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Nambiar et al., 2021b) where they may induce the expression of ER stress markers (Kim et al., 2007). ER stress has been linked to misfolded gene production in type II alveolar epithelial cells leading to pulmonary fibrosis via multiple mechanisms, including M2 macrophage polarization and alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis (Burman et al., 2018). High-fat diets were also shown to exacerbate pulmonary fibrosis in mice via modulation of ER stress (Chu et al., 2019). An upregulation of certain triglycerides has been described in progressing compared to stable IPF patients (Nambiar et al., 2021b) whilst we found elevated levels in IPF vs. HV. Contrarily to Nambiar et al., we found within IPF patients that lower baseline triglyceride levels were associated with poor prognosis. The association found in our data may also be due to effects of pulmonary cachexia in patients with more advanced disease (Luppi et al., 2021). The mechanistic involvement of the individual triglycerides found is not clear and more research focusing on triglyceride effects in pulmonary fibrosis models is needed. Interestingly also in other types of organ fibrosis an increase in triglycerides was noted such as chronic kidney disease and fibrotic liver diseases (Chen et al., 2017; Monteillet et al., 2018; Harzandi et al., 2021). In addition, an increase in triglycerides was also observed in several murine models of organ fibrosis (Harzandi et al., 2021; Weckerle et al., 2021). In contrast, patients with cancer including lung malignancies show a down-regulation of triglycerides, which is associated with poor outcome (Siemianowicz et al., 2000). It was speculated that an increase in triglycerides may derive from increased cell death and injury, while in cancer cells proliferation consumes triglycerides, a major constituent of cells and energy provider. We also found ceramides up-regulated in IPF. Ceramides are important in epithelial barrier integrity and were also reported to be up-regulated in airway diseases such as COPD (Teichgräber et al., 2008; Bowler et al., 2015; Cruickshank-Quinn et al., 2018). Thus, increase in multiple types of triglycerides and ceramide is a hallmark of IPF and may be related to epithelial pathology. Lysophosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylcholines were on the other hand down-regulated in serum of IPF patients. A major constituent of surfactant are phosphatidylcholines and it is thought that decrease of these lipoproteins in IPF and COPD is caused by decreased surfactant protein production by reduced numbers of alveolar epithelial type II cells (Cruickshank-Quinn et al., 2018). Interestingly, different lysophosphatidylcholines were found to be upregulated (as opposed to the downregulation in both our IPF cohorts) in two other publications. Rindlisbacher and coworkers found one unspecified Lysopgopshatidylcholine which was upregulated in 10 stable IPF compared to HV. In another cohort of IPF patients and HV published in abstract form, LysoPC(20:3) was reportedly upregulated while it was downregulated in our cohort. Given only minimal patient information being available for the second study (especially antifibrotic medication) and several LysoPCs were upregulated following nintedanib treatment (Table S4) this may potentially explain the discrepancy. Either way, LysoPCs seem to be involved in IPF pathogenesis. LysoPCs serve as precursor molecules in the production of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) via ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase-phosphodiesterase 2 (ENPP2), or Autotaxin (ATX) (Ninou et al., 2018). LPA mediates its effects via a range of receptors, most importantly LPAR1, contributing to profibrotic fibroblast activation (Tager et al., 2008), TGF-ß activation (Xu et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2013) and endothelial permeability promoting inflammation (Ninou et al., 2018). ATX was shown to be upregulated in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in bleomycin models (Oikonomou et al., 2012) and its inhibition ameliorated LPA levels and pulmonary fibrosis in bleomycin models (Oikonomou et al., 2012; Kato et al., 2016; Desroy et al., 2017). These findings served as rationale for clinical trials with autotaxin inhibitors in IPF (Maher et al., 2019). Despite these effects of LPA and other known effects of LysoPC as their precursors, correlation with circulating LysoPC levels are unclear and in some diseases even inverse correlations have been described (Law et al., 2019), rendering direct measurements of LPA or autotaxin activity more suitable for correlations in IPF. Changes in amino acids are also of high interest. We and others found l-glutamine highly upregulated (Log2 fold-change 105) in IPF. TGF-β, upregulated in fibrosis, was shown to induce glutaminolysis in lung fibroblasts and consecutively leads to increased collagen production (Bernard et al., 2018; Hamanaka et al., 2019). Our cohort was large enough to allow for survival and outcome analyses. Using cox-regression modeling we found 16 metabolites associated with a composite endpoint of time to disease progression or death. Among the disease progression associated metabolites were lyso-phosphatidylcholine, choline and triacylglyceride (16:1_34:1). None of these metabolites were differentially expressed in the comparison of healthy volunteers and IPF. Our study included also serial measurements of patients in whom treatment with either pirfenidone or nintedanib was initiated. A second serum sample was obtained 8 weeks after therapy start. While we did not find any significant metabolite changes with pirfenidone treatment, significant changes were induced by nintedanib. Unexpectedly most of the differentially expressed metabolites were up-regulated and were not related to the above described changes in serum metabolome of IPF patients versus healthy volunteers. Of interest, multiple studies reported metabolic changes with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Growing evidence indicates major changes in metabolome with imatinib, a TKI targeting platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors, used for treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (Póvoa et al., 2021). Likewise, in-vitro experiments with a macrophage cell line indicated that SU1498, a TKI blocking VEGF-R signaling, induced upregulation of triglycerides and a decrease in glycerophosphocholine (Mesti et al., 2014). These data suggest that the metabolic changes observed with nintedanib are rather a direct drug-effect and not related to modulation of disease associated metabolic changes. Nevertheless, we observed that the described upregulation of triglycerides by nintedanib treatment was only present in a subset of the patients, while others did not show this finding when serum samples prior and during nintedanib treatment were compared. Also, the deregulated analytes were different between the two IPF cohorts, potentially owing to the milder disease extent in the second cohort. Interestingly the group of patients with nintedanib induced changes in their metabolome had the best outcome results and showed a significantly longer time to disease progression or death compared to patients with no treatment induced metabolic changes. These data suggest that treatment efficacy may differ between patient subsets and metabolic changes and especially an increase in triglycerides may serve as a biomarker for treatment response. Our study has significant limitations. Since we found metabolites that correlated with disease severity, the milder disease extent in the second cohort may partially explain incongruent findings between the IPF cohorts and may hamper comparability. Further, the overall milder disease in cohort 2 and smaller group size prevented us from running correlations with clinical features and analyte concentrations in this cohort. The analytes identified to correlate with both survival and baseline GAP score showed a rather low correlation, rendering their biological relevance subject to further studies. Metabolomic measurements are subject to a variety of confounders, including environmental factors (Lu et al., 2017). The cohort 1 and 2 were not measured on the same day, although a number of samples from cohort 1 was repeatedly measured on the same batch as cohort 2, with only moderate variances in metabolite levels. Dietary differences between patients were not assessed but may have influenced the results. Likewise, due to frequent adverse events, the overall adherence to antifibrotic therapy may vary broadly and some patients in these cohorts may not have taken their medication at the time of sampling (B103, 2019). Importantly, the high throughput lipidomic technology used herein does not allow for reliable identification of exact lipid structures (i.e. TG (16:0_34:2) allows for 6 potential isomers). Follow-up investigations for candidate lipids thorough to classify these lipids in detail are needed (Liebisch et al., 2013). We acknowledge our results at this stage are merely hypothesis generating, but given the lack of treatment response biomarkers in IPF, exploratory analyses seem warranted. In conclusion, we report major changes in metabolites in two independent cohorts testing a large number of patients. Several metabolites are associated with poor outcome. In summary, specific lipidic metabolite signatures may serve as biomarkers for disease progression or favorable treatment response to nintedanib.
  65 in total

1.  An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Ganesh Raghu; Bram Rochwerg; Yuan Zhang; Carlos A Cuello Garcia; Arata Azuma; Juergen Behr; Jan L Brozek; Harold R Collard; William Cunningham; Sakae Homma; Takeshi Johkoh; Fernando J Martinez; Jeffrey Myers; Shandra L Protzko; Luca Richeldi; David Rind; Moisés Selman; Arthur Theodore; Athol U Wells; Henk Hoogsteden; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Lysophosphatidic acid receptor-2 deficiency confers protection against bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis in mice.

Authors:  Long Shuang Huang; Panfeng Fu; Priya Patel; Anantha Harijith; Tianjiao Sun; Yutong Zhao; Joe G N Garcia; Jerold Chun; Viswanathan Natarajan
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.914

3.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  The Role of Metabolomics in the Study of Cancer Biomarkers and in the Development of Diagnostic Tools.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Trezzi; Nikos Vlassis; Karsten Hiller
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Effects of triglyceride on ER stress and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Do-Sung Kim; Seul-Ki Jeong; Hyung-Ryong Kim; Dal-Sik Kim; Soo-Wan Chae; Han-Jung Chae
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Shorthand notation for lipid structures derived from mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Gerhard Liebisch; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Harald Köfeler; Martin Trötzmüller; William J Griffiths; Gerd Schmitz; Friedrich Spener; Michael J O Wakelam
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Untargeted metabolomics of human plasma reveal lipid markers unique to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Shabarinath Nambiar; Dino Bee Aik Tan; Britt Clynick; Sze How Bong; Catherine Rawlinson; Joel Gummer; Tamera J Corte; Ian Glaspole; Yuben P Moodley; Robert Trengove
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  MetSizeR: selecting the optimal sample size for metabolomic studies using an analysis based approach.

Authors:  Gift Nyamundanda; Isobel Claire Gormley; Yue Fan; William M Gallagher; Lorraine Brennan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  An Updated Review of Lysophosphatidylcholine Metabolism in Human Diseases.

Authors:  Shi-Hui Law; Mei-Lin Chan; Gopal K Marathe; Farzana Parveen; Chu-Huang Chen; Liang-Yin Ke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Identification of the lipid biomarkers from plasma in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by Lipidomics.

Authors:  Feng Yan; Zhensong Wen; Rui Wang; Wenling Luo; Yufeng Du; Wenjun Wang; Xianyang Chen
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.