Literature DB >> 36059900

Beyond Face Value: Evidence for the Universality of Bodily Expressions of Emotion.

Zachary Witkower1, Alexander K Hill2, Jeremy Koster3, Jessica L Tracy1.   

Abstract

Research on emotion communication typically focuses on facial expressions, yet scientists dating back to Darwin have noted the importance of the body in conveying emotions. In fact, studies have found that the body is reliably used to express and recognize anger, fear, and sadness, by individuals in several industrialized populations. Here, we provide the first evidence that bodily expressions of these three emotions are reliably recognized by members of an isolated small-scale traditional society: the Mayangna of Nicaragua. Specifically, we found that recognition rates for sadness and anger bodily expressions were high, and recognition rates for a fear bodily expression were lower but still significantly greater than chance. Given that the Mayangna are unlikely to have learned these bodily expressions through cross-cultural transmission, their ability to recognize these displays provides strong evidence for the universality of each expression. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00052-y. © The Society for Affective Science 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bodily expression; Emotion Expression; Universality

Year:  2021        PMID: 36059900      PMCID: PMC9382937          DOI: 10.1007/s42761-021-00052-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Affect Sci        ISSN: 2662-2041


  28 in total

1.  Studying the dynamics of emotional expression using synthesized facial muscle movements.

Authors:  T Wehrle; S Kaiser; S Schmidt; K R Scherer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-01

2.  On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hillary Anger Elfenbein; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Winand H Dittrich; Andrew J Gemmell; Andrew W Young
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Most people are not WEIRD.

Authors:  Joseph Henrich; Steven J Heine; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications.

Authors:  Charles S Carver; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Head and body cues in the judgment of emotion: a reformulation.

Authors:  P Ekman; W V Friesen
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-06

8.  Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations.

Authors:  Disa A Sauter; Frank Eisner; Paul Ekman; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Postural Communication of Emotion: Perception of Distinct Poses of Five Discrete Emotions.

Authors:  Lukas D Lopez; Peter J Reschke; Jennifer M Knothe; Eric A Walle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-16

10.  Family ties: the multilevel effects of households and kinship on the networks of individuals.

Authors:  Jeremy Koster
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Acquiring Complex Communicative Systems: Statistical Learning of Language and Emotion.

Authors:  Ashley L Ruba; Seth D Pollak; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-04-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.