| Literature DB >> 36059718 |
Kenji Endo1, Yasunobu Sawaji1, Takato Aihara1, Hidekazu Suzuki1, Kazuma Murata1, Yuji Matsuoka1, Hirosuke Nishimura1, Taichiro Takamatsu1, Takamitsu Konishi1, Kengo Yamamoto1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the proportion of elderly people continues to increase, the number of patients with dropped head syndrome (DHS) also grows. However, the relationship between onset and clinical course of DHS has hardly been studied, particularly, that of sudden-onset DHS has not been reported and remains unclear. OBSERVATIONS: Sudden-onset DHS was defined as presenting with chin on chest deformity within 3 days from the time of awareness of cervical weakness. Sixty-six patients with DHS visited our facility. Among them, 8 of the total cases (12.1%) had experienced sudden onset DHS (6 females and 2 males; average age: 71.9 ± 10.9 years). Six of 8 cases showed recovery by conservative treatment, whose first interventions were from 0.1 to 12 months, but 3 experienced recurrence. Diffuse spinal kyphotic-type DHS was seen in 2 cases, and both had recurring horizontal gaze disturbance after initial recovery. Two unimproved cases underwent surgery of combined anterior and posterior cervical fixation, and their first interventions were at 5 and 24 months. After surgery, cervical sagittal alignment was improved, and they could walk maintaining horizontal gaze. LESSONS: Sudden-onset DHS can be expected to have a better outcome, but recurrence is possible in global imbalanced-type DHS.Entities:
Keywords: DHS = dropped head syndrome; INEM = isolated neck extensor myopathy; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; STIR = short-time inversion recovery; dropped head syndrome; echography; histology; magnetic resonance imaging; sudden onset
Year: 2021 PMID: 36059718 PMCID: PMC9435544 DOI: 10.3171/CASE21177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosurg Case Lessons ISSN: 2694-1902
Case series
| Case No. | Age (yrs) | Sex | Features | Type | Comorbidity | Onset | Clin Grad 1st Interv (mos) | Clin Grad | Clin Grad Recur | Pain | Pain Follow | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81 | F | Chin on chest | C | Bladder cancer | 1 day | 2 (0.1) | 1 (4) | None | (++) | (−) | Improved |
| 2 | 87 | M | Chin on chest supported by hand | D | Atelectasis | 3 days | 3 (5) | 1 (7) | 3 (6) | (−) | (−) | Recurrence |
| 3 | 59 | F | Chin on chest | C | Urinary cancer | Wake up | 2 (5) | None | None | (++) | (−) | Operation |
| 4 | 79 | F | Chin on chest supported by hand | C | Goiter | 3 days | 3 (12) | 2 (7) | None | (++) | (+) | Improved |
| 5 | 70 | F | Chin on chest supported by hand | C | None | 2 days | 2 (4) | 2 (7) | None | (−) | (−) | Improved |
| 6 | 69 | M | Chin on chest | D | Gastric ulcer | Wake up | 2 (0.1) | 1 (5) | 2 (6) | (++) | (+) | Recurrence |
| 7 | 55 | F | Chin on chest | C | Insomnia | Wake up | 3 (24) | None | None | (++) | (−) | Operation |
| 8 | 75 | F | Chin on chest | C | Breast cancer | Wake up | 3 (0.1) | 2 (2) | 3 (1) | (++) | (+) | Recurrence |
1st Interv = first intervention since DHS onset; C = cervical local kyphotic type DHS; Clin Grad = clinical grading; D = diffuse spinal kyphosis-type DHS; Recur = periods of recurrence; Pain Follow = pain at DHS follow-up; Pain Onset = pain at dropped head syndrome onset; − = painless; + = moderate pain; ++ = severe pain.
DHS clinical grading
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | Continuous gait possible more than 30 minutes without cervical complain (normal condition) |
| 1 | Continuous gait possible more than 30 minutes with cervical complain |
| 2 | Impossible to gait keeping horizontal gaze without support more than 30 minutes |
| 3 | Impossible to gait keeping horizontal gaze without support more than a few minutes |
| 4 | Impossible to stand keeping horizontal gaze without support more than a few minutes |
| +N | Neurological deficit |
Degree of improvement: 1 grade up; improve more than 2 grades up: well improved. Support means cane, walker, cervical, or trunk brace (excluding the reason without dropped head).
FIG. 1.Comparison of the posture at diagnosis and 7 months after our conservative treatment in case 2.
FIG. 2.Case 2. A: Lateral radiographic findings at cervical flexion (arrow indicates interspinous elongation between C6 and C7). B: Cervical sagittal MRI findings on STIR (arrow indicates signal change at cervical extensor muscles). C: Echography finding at interspinous space between C6 and C7 (arrow shows angiogenesis by Doppler method). D: Original magnification ×100. Pathological findings at interspinous space between C6 and C7 (arrow indicates angiogenesis in interspinous ligaments).