| Literature DB >> 36059435 |
Rasha T Kakati1, Walid Faraj1, Taha Qaraqe1, Frederic El Chaer1, Hero Hussain2, Ali Shamseddine3, Mohamad Jawad Khalife1.
Abstract
Immunotherapy poses new considerations and alterations to the management of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), where chemotherapy achieves complete radiological response but yields complete pathological response in few patients only. Immunotherapy may be superior in the conversion of unresectable disease to resectable liver lesions from mCRC and downsizing borderline lesions for more feasible resectability and achieving complete pathologic response, with the potential for cure and to alter current, established guidelines for surgical resection with a shift from chemotherapy. We present two patients with hepatic lesions from mCRC characterized by deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) which were unresectable after traditional chemotherapy but were converted to resectable lesions with a complete histopathological response following immunotherapy. Complete histopathologic response and radiologic regression or disappearance of liver lesions was observed in patients with dMMR mCRC after pembrolizumab. Immunotherapy exhibits notable potential for cure, achieving complete, successful surgical resection and improving prognosis. Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal carcinoma; histopathological response; immune-checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; liver metastasis; metastasectomy; pembrolizumab; potential cure
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059435 PMCID: PMC9433095 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2042-8812
Figure 1CT and MRI images our two patients before and after treatment with pembrolizumab; (A1) Pretreatment MRI of our first patient in September 2017 showing most prominent lesions, located in Segments IVb and V, on axial enhanced CT after contrast administration; (A2) Posttreatment axial enhanced T1-weighted MRI of our first patient in January 2019 showing most prominent lesions located in Segments IVb and V; the lesion in Segment V is smaller, measuring 1.4 cm, and is completely necrotic; (B1) Pretreatment axial enhanced T1-weighted sequence MRI performed on 3Tesla field strength following gadolinium contrast administration in our first patient in October 2019 showing most prominent lesions, located in Segments V and VIII; the largest metastatic lesion is a 4.8-cm heterogeneously enhancing metastatic lesion in Segment VIII; (B2) Posttreatment axial enhanced T1-weighted sequence MRI performed on 3Tesla field strength following gadolinium contrast administration in the hepatobiliary phase in our second patient in July 2020, showing most prominent lesions located in Segments V and VIII; the largest lesion in Segment VIII decreases in size to 1.5 cm following treatment and is completely necrotic.
Progression of size and response as noted on CT and MRI of hepatic metastatic lesions and the colonic mass at different points of the treatment course in our two patients
| Imaging date | Treatment stage | Segment/location | No. of lesions per segment | Size of largest lesion (cm) | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First patient | |||||
| September 2017 | Initial presentation prior to therapy initiation | Segment I | None | - | Baseline |
| Segment II | 1 | 1.7 × 1.5 | |||
| Segment III | None | - | |||
| Segment IVa | None | - | |||
| Segment IVb | 1 | 2.1 × 1.7 | |||
| Segment V | 2 | 1.6 × 1.5 | |||
| Segment VI | None | - | |||
| Segment VII | 1 | 1.1 × 0.7 | |||
| Segment VIII | None | - | |||
| Colon | 1 | 6.2 × 4.1 × 3.8 | |||
| December 2017 | After subtotal colectomy, Folfox and Avastin | Segment I | None | - | - |
| Segment II | 1 | 3.4 × 3 | Increase in size | ||
| Segment III | None | - | - | ||
| Segment IVa | None | - | - | ||
| Segment IVb | 1 | 4 × 2.5 | Increase in size | ||
| Segment V | 2 | 4.1 × 3.4 and smaller 2.2 × 1.8 | |||
| Segment VI | None | - | - | ||
| Segment VII | 1 | 0.9 × 0.8 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment VIII | None | - | - | ||
| Colon | None | - | Resected | ||
| January 2019 | After 19 cycles of pembrolizumab and prior to metastasectomy | Segment I | None | - | - |
| Segment II | 1 | 0.9 × 0.8 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment III | None | - | - | ||
| Segment IVa | None | - | - | ||
| Segment IVb | 1 | 1.4 × 0.9 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment V | 2 | 1.4 × 1.3 and smaller 0.7 × 0.6 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment VI | None | - | - | ||
| Segment VII | 1 | 0.5 × 4 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment VIII | None | - | - | ||
| Colon | None | - | Resected | ||
| Second patient | |||||
| October 2019 | After receiving four cycles of Xelox and Avastin | Segment I | 1 | 1.9 × 1.2 | Baseline |
| Segment II | 2 | 2.7 × 2.1 | |||
| Segment III | None | - | |||
| Segment IVa | 1 | 1 × 0.9 | |||
| Segment IVb | None | - | |||
| Segment V | 5 | 4.7 × 4.5 | |||
| Segment VI | 5 | 4.2 × 3.7 | |||
| Segment VII | 4 | 1.7 × 1.3 | |||
| Segment VIII | 6 | 4.8 × 4.1 | |||
| Colon | 1 | 4.5 × 2.9 | |||
| July 2020 | After 12 cycles of pembrolizumab and prior to metastasectomy | Segment I | 0 | - | Zero of one—lesion no longer seen |
| Segment II | 2 | 1.1 × 0.7 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment III | None | - | - | ||
| Segment IVa | 1 | 0.4 × 0.4 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment IVb | None | - | - | ||
| Segment V | 4 | 2.2 × 1.9 | Four of five lesions—one lesion no longer seen, four decreased in size | ||
| Segment VI | 5 | 1.3 × 1 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment VII | 4 | 0.3 | Decrease in size | ||
| Segment VIII | 4 | 1.5 × 1.2 | Four of six lesions—two lesions no longer seen, four lesions decreased in size | ||
| Colon | 1 | 1.7 × 1.5 | Decrease in size | ||
Figure 2Graphical representation of the trend in size of the greatest tumor dimension of the largest liver lesions noted on CT and MRI in each liver segment at multiple points during the course of treatment in (A) our first patient and (B) our second patient.