| Literature DB >> 36059403 |
Abstract
The construction and operation of China's rail transit system have entered a high-speed development stage, and the rapid increase of train speed and mileage has brought greater challenges to the safety and reliability of the rail transit system. Network planning evaluation is the key to the early decision-making of urban rail transit project, which directly determines the success or failure of the whole project. How to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the urban rail transit information resource network planning has become a difficult problem for many urban planners to solve. Therefore, this paper studies the optimization of the communication resource allocation algorithm and the comprehensive evaluation of its application for urban rail transit planning. In this paper, based on CVNN structure, the network prototype is an extension of RVNN structure. In the abstract, its processing unit is composed of a pair of real-number processors that can realize certain operations. HNN is a fully connected recurrent neural network based on the idea of the energy function, which is helpful to understand the calculation mode of HNN, and the research shows that HNN can solve many combinatorial optimization problems. In addition, the combination of neural network and genetic algorithm with simulated annealing mechanism can also bring new directions for research. On the basis of experimental analysis, it can be concluded that in general, the error reduction rate of the optimization scheme designed in this paper can reach 58.6% on average. In practical application, the accuracy of the optimal bit error rate is 52.4%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059403 PMCID: PMC9436523 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5608665
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Composition and energy consumption structure of wireless sensor nodes.
Figure 2Single complex-valued neuron model.
Subchannel allocation mapping of users.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| User1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| User2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| User3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Planning to assign the weight of each indicator.
| Factor | Weights | Factor | Weights | Factor | Weights | Factor+ | Weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.1078 |
| 0.0127 |
| 0.1574 |
| 0.0354 |
|
| 0.0145 |
| 0.1457 |
| 0.1457 |
| 0.0475 |
|
| 0.1354 |
| 0.1068 |
| 0.3547 |
| 0.0241 |
Figure 3Embedded wavelet neural network structure.
Figure 4Error performance analysis.
Figure 5BER performance detection analysis.
Figure 6Comparison of the efficiency of the optimization algorithm and a single algorithm on different sample sets.