| Literature DB >> 36059390 |
Shifeng Wang1, Xueyong Ding1, Qingji Tan2.
Abstract
To enhance the visualization effect of substation high-voltage electrical equipment vulnerability, this study proposes an ISSA-LSTM coupled video overlay algorithm-based substation high-voltage electrical equipment vulnerability visualization and monitoring model. Using the improved α blending algorithm combined with the inverse sampling of video background color, overlaying visible video as well as infrared video, using the improved adaptive weighted two-dimensional principal component analysis (W2DPCA) to fuse the base layer, selecting the detail layer as the final detail layer, obtaining the final fusion frame, and realizing the visualization and monitoring of substation high-voltage electrical equipment vulnerability, and introducing the improved sparrow search algorithm (ISSA) to establish long and short-term memory network prediction model to reduce the prediction error and improve the monitoring accuracy rate. The experimental results show that the monitoring frames obtained by this method can reflect rich details of substation high-voltage electrical equipment, and the texture color and equipment edge contrast are enhanced to facilitate accurate determination of substation high-voltage electrical equipment vulnerability, and the prediction accuracy of ISSA-LSTM model is as high as 99.85%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36059390 PMCID: PMC9439928 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3713279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Benchmark function results.
| Benchmark function | Dimension | Search space | Optimal value | SSA | ISSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3 | [−100, 100] | 0 | 4.006 × 10−3 | 4.006 × 10−89 |
|
| 3 | [−100, 100] | 0 | 1.049 × 10−1 | 6.023 × 10−17 |
|
| 3 | [−100, 100] | 0 | 2.891 × 10−1 | 1.343 × 10−89 |
|
| 3 | [−100, 100] | 0 | 1.779 × 10−1 | 1.624 × 10−46 |
|
| 3 | [−30, 30] | 0 | 3.262 × 10−2 | 1.0667 × 10−3 |
Objective index comparison of image quality before and after fusion.
| Objective indicators | Prefusion results | Postfusion result |
|---|---|---|
| Entropy | 7.55 | 7.57 |
| Standard deviation | 55.39 | 56.48 |
| Root mean square error | 6.63 | 2.84 |
| Peak signal-to-noise ratio | 70.36 | 87.33 |
| Spatial frequency | 11.026 | 15.51 |
| Average gradient | 5.192 | 6.09 |
Degree of damage to high-voltage electrical equipment.
| Divide area | Substation | Total number of high-voltage electrical equipment | Quantity of damaged equipment |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6 | 243 | 197 |
| B | 4 | 185 | 115 |
| C | 6 | 285 | 97 |
| D | 5 | 219 | 76 |
| E | 4 | 197 | 58 |
| F | 4 | 193 | 39 |
Figure 1LSTM model training loss.
Accuracy of swarm intelligence algorithm model.
| Training set | LSTM | ISSA-LSTM | SSA-LSTM | PSO-LSTM | GWO-LSTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1000 | 93.25 | 95.24 | 93.96 | 93.37 | 94.31 |
| 2500 | 95.45 | 97.59 | 97.11 | 96.17 | 96.44 |
| 5000 | 96.64 | 98.33 | 97.23 | 96.93 | 97.14 |
| 10,000 | 97.50 | 99.36 | 98.69 | 98.33 | 98.48 |
| 15,000 | 97.74 | 99.67 | 99.26 | 99.07 | 98.90 |
| 20,000 | 97.77 | 99.85 | 99.46 | 99.16 | 99.49 |
Figure 2The relationship between the number of iterations and model accuracy.
Comparison of optimized parameter results.
| Swarm intelligence optimization algorithm | Positive sample judgment accuracy rate (%) | Negative sample judgment accuracy rate (%) | Positive sample recall rate (%) | Negative sample recall rate (%) | Positive sample | Negative class sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISSA | 99.89 | 99.81 | 99.38 | 99.96 | 0.996 | 0.998 |
| SSA | 99.58 | 99.40 | 98.55 | 99.84 | 0.990 | 0.996 |
| PSO | 99.47 | 99.03 | 97.63 | 99.80 | 0.985 | 0.994 |
| GWO | 99.89 | 99.34 | 98.50 | 99.96 | 0.991 | 0.996 |