Literature DB >> 36059327

Ophthalmic Complications in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Prospective Study.

Swapnil M Jain1, Neelima Gehlot1, Arunkumar Kv1, Pawan Prasad1, Prashansa Mehta1, Thota Roger Paul2, Ankit Dupare3, Chakka Satyadev Cvns4, Sadaf Rahman5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and types of ophthalmic complications associated with maxillofacial trauma over a period of 24 months.
METHODS: An institutional prospective study was conducted on 62 patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma to study the correlation between facial trauma and ophthalmic complications.
RESULTS: Road traffic accidents were reported to be the primary etiologic factor for most trauma cases studied. Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture was associated with more ophthalmic complications while fractures involving the orbital rims and walls were associated with severe complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial trauma, particularly those associated with midface, including ZMC fracture, Le Fort II, Le Fort III, and naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures, can commonly cause ophthalmic complications and blindness in rare cases. Hence, every patient with maxillofacial trauma should undergo an ophthalmic examination and should be placed under close observation for necessary treatment when required.
Copyright © 2022, Jain et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blindness; maxillofacial trauma; ocular injuries; ophthalmic complications; ophthalmoplegia; panfacial trauma

Year:  2022        PMID: 36059327      PMCID: PMC9433813          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  23 in total

Review 1.  Traumatic hyphema: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  M T Brandt; R H Haug
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Delayed post-traumatic visual loss: a clinical dilemma.

Authors:  T Eidlitz-Markus; A Shuper; M Schwartz; M Mimouni
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 3.  Ocular injury, visual impairment, and blindness associated with facial fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Michael Magarakis; Gerhard S Mundinger; Joseph A Kelamis; Amir H Dorafshar; Branko Bojovic; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Blindness after facial fractures: a 19-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein Ansari
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  The pattern of maxillofacial fractures in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: a review of 230 cases.

Authors:  Hamad Ebrahim Al Ahmed; Mohamed A Jaber; Salem H Abu Fanas; Mark Karas
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2004-08

6.  Ophthalmic injuries in patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures requiring surgical repair.

Authors:  Basem T Jamal; Scott M Pfahler; Kate A Lane; Jurj R Bilyk; Edmund A Pribitkin; Robert J Diecidue; Daniel I Taub
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Ocular Injuries Associated with Midface Fractures: A 5 Year Survey.

Authors:  G C Rajkumar; D P Ashwin; Rohit Singh; R Prashanth; K B Rudresh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-27

8.  Etiology, incidence and patterns of mid-face fractures and associated ocular injuries.

Authors:  Dilip Septa; Vilas P Newaskar; Deepak Agrawal; Shailendra Tibra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-12-06

Review 9.  Blindness after reduction of facial fractures.

Authors:  J A Girotto; W B Gamble; B Robertson; R Redett; T Muehlberger; M Mayer; J Zinreich; N Iliff; N Miller; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The characteristics of midfacial fractures and the association with ocular injury: a prospective study.

Authors:  I A al-Qurainy; L F Stassen; G N Dutton; K F Moos; A el-Attar
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.