Literature DB >> 36057906

Rational design of stapled helical peptides as antidiabetic PPARγ antagonists to target coactivator site by decreasing unfavorable entropy penalty instead of increasing favorable enthalpy contribution.

Yang Zhang1, Jie Wang1, Wenchao Li1, Ying Guo2.   

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor and has been exploited as a well-established druggable target for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM). Traditionally, small-molecule compounds have been developed to attack at the ligand site and Ser273 phosphorylation site of PPARγ. In this study, we derived helical peptide segments from the LXXLL motif region of coactivator proteins as antidiabetic PPARγ antagonists, which were expected to competitively disrupt the native interaction between PPARγ and its cognate coactivators by rebinding at PPARγ coactivator site. Structural analysis, dynamics simulation and energetics dissection revealed that these peptides cannot be well folded into active helical structure when splitting from the protein context of their parent coactivators and exhibit a large flexibility and intrinsic disorder in the free state, which would, therefore, incur a considerable entropy penalty upon rebinding to PPARγ. Hydrocarbon stapling strategy was employed to constrain these free coactivator peptides into ordered helical conformation, thus largely minimizing unfavorable entropy penalty but having only a moderate effect on favorable enthalpy contribution. The computational findings were further substantiated by fluorescence-based assays; the binding affinity of three potent SRC1, NCoA6 and p300 coactivator peptides to PPARγ was observed to be improved by 7.2-fold, 4.2-fold and 5.7-fold upon the stapling, which were also measured to have an efficient competitive potency with their unstapled counterparts for PPARγ coactivator site, with CC50 = 0.096, 0.12 and 0.18 μM, respectively.
© 2022. European Biophysical Societies' Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coactivator; Diabetes mellitus; Enthalpy; Entropy; Hydrocarbon stapling; Peptide; Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ

Year:  2022        PMID: 36057906     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-022-01616-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   2.095


  35 in total

1.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Targeting Self-Binding Peptides as a Novel Strategy To Regulate Protein Activity and Function: A Case Study on the Proto-oncogene Tyrosine Protein Kinase c-Src.

Authors:  Zhengya Bai; Shasha Hou; Shilei Zhang; Zhongyan Li; Peng Zhou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Structure-based derivation and optimization of YAP-like coactivator-derived peptides to selectively target TEAD family transcription factors by hydrocarbon stapling and cyclization.

Authors:  Bo He; Tao Wu; Ping He; Fenglin Lv; Hongxiang Liu
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.817

4.  Obesity-Linked PPARγ S273 Phosphorylation Promotes Insulin Resistance through Growth Differentiation Factor 3.

Authors:  Jessica A Hall; Deepti Ramachandran; Hyun C Roh; Joanna R DiSpirito; Thiago Belchior; Peter-James H Zushin; Colin Palmer; Shangyu Hong; Amir I Mina; Bingyang Liu; Zhaoming Deng; Pratik Aryal; Christopher Jacobs; Danielle Tenen; Chester W Brown; Julia F Charles; Gerald I Shulman; Barbara B Kahn; Linus T Y Tsai; Evan D Rosen; Bruce M Spiegelman; Alexander S Banks
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 27.287

5.  Both coactivator LXXLL motif-dependent and -independent interactions are required for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) function.

Authors:  S Chen; B A Johnson; Y Li; S Aster; B McKeever; R Mosley; D E Moller; G Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-02-11       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Design, synthesis, and evaluation of imidazo[4,5-c]pyridin-4-one derivatives with dual activity at angiotensin II type 1 receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ.

Authors:  Agustin Casimiro-Garcia; Ronald J Heemstra; Christopher F Bigge; Jing Chen; Fred A Ciske; Jo Ann Davis; Teresa Ellis; Nadia Esmaeil; Declan Flynn; Seungil Han; Mehran Jalaie; Jeffrey F Ohren; Noel A Powell
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Partial agonists activate PPARgamma using a helix 12 independent mechanism.

Authors:  John B Bruning; Michael J Chalmers; Swati Prasad; Scott A Busby; Theodore M Kamenecka; Yuanjun He; Kendall W Nettles; Patrick R Griffin
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Revisiting PPARγ as a target for the treatment of metabolic disorders.

Authors:  Sun-Sil Choi; Jiyoung Park; Jang Hyun Choi
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 9.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and their ligands: nutritional and clinical implications--a review.

Authors:  Bogna Grygiel-Górniak
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 10.  The therapeutic potential of inhibiting PPARγ phosphorylation to treat type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rebecca L Frkic; Katharina Richter; John B Bruning
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.