Literature DB >> 36057082

A screening test is not enough to define the prognostic role of cognitive impairment after hip fracture: a short-term prospective study.

Francesca Bardesono1, Silvia Trombetta2, Laura Gullone2, Alessandra Bonardo2, Patrizia Gindri2, Carlotta Castiglioni1, Edoardo Milano2, Giuseppe Massazza3, Marco Di Monaco4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment assessed by easy-to-administer tests successfully predicts function after hip fracture, whereas the prognostic role of additional cognitive evaluations is largely unknown. AIMS: To investigate the capability of further assessments to discriminate cognitive impairment with prognostic relevance in hip-fracture women defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ).
METHODS: We prospectively investigated women with subacute hip fracture admitted to our rehabilitation facility. The women who made ≤4 errors on the SPMSQ were further assessed by 4 tests: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (immediate and delayed recall) and Frontal Assessment Battery. Activities of daily living (ADL) were measured by the Barthel index. Successful rehabilitation was defined with a Barthel index score ≥85.
RESULTS: Data from 127 women were available. Each of the 4 cognitive tests assessed at admission significantly predicted the Barthel index scores measured at discharge. The predictive role persisted after multiple adjustments. For a change in cognitive scores corresponding to the difference between 25° and 75° percentiles in their distribution in the sample, the adjusted odds ratio to achieve successful rehabilitation roughly ranged from 2 to 4, depending on which cognitive test was adopted. DISCUSSION: The women with subacute hip fracture defined cognitively intact or mildly impaired on the SPMSQ could have cognitive impairment revealed by further examination, with prognostic disadvantages in ADL.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessing cognition by the SPMSQ seems not enough to exclude the presence of cognitive impairment with relevant prognostic disadvantage in hip-fracture women.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADL; Cognitive dysfunction; Hip fracture; Neuropshychological tests

Year:  2022        PMID: 36057082     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02233-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   4.481


  31 in total

1.  Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture in Independent Community-Dwelling Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer A Ouellet; Gregory M Ouellet; Alison M Romegialli; Marilyn Hirsch; Lisa Berardi; Christine M Ramsey; Leo M Cooney; Lisa M Walke
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  A multicenter survey on profile of care for hip fracture: predictors of mortality and disability.

Authors:  S Maggi; P Siviero; T Wetle; R W Besdine; M Saugo; G Crepaldi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Pre-discharge prognostic factors of physical function among older adults with hip fracture surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  K K Lim; D B Matchar; J L Chong; W Yeo; T S Howe; J S B Koh
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Risk factors for mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: a meta-analysis of 18 studies.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Zhiqian Wang; Wenliang Xiao
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Orthogeriatric co-management for the care of older subjects with hip fracture: recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus.

Authors:  Antonio De Vincentis; Astrid Ursula Behr; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Bravi; Anna Castaldo; Lucia Galluzzo; Giovanni Iolascon; Stefania Maggi; Emilio Martini; Alberto Momoli; Graziano Onder; Marco Paoletta; Luca Pietrogrande; Mauro Roselli; Mauro Ruggeri; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Fabio Santacaterina; Luigi Tritapepe; Amedeo Zurlo; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Prognostic factors of functional outcome after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  K J Sheehan; L Williamson; J Alexander; C Filliter; B Sobolev; P Guy; L M Bearne; C Sackley
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Rehabilitation of older adults with hip fracture: cognitive function and walking abilities.

Authors:  Sara Morghen; Simona Gentile; Eleonora Ricci; Fabio Guerini; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Trabucchi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  The effects of dementia on the prognosis and mortality of hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingzhuang Hou; Yijian Zhang; Angela Carley Chen; Tao Liu; Huilin Yang; Xuesong Zhu; Fan He
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Predictors of poor functional outcomes and mortality in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bang Yu Xu; Shi Yan; Lian Leng Low; Farhad Fakhrudin Vasanwala; Sher Guan Low
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures after hip fracture in patients with chronic cognitive impairment : results from 34,675 patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.

Authors:  Malfrid H Kristoffersen; Eva H Dybvik; Ole M Steihaug; Torbjørn B Kristensen; Lars B Engesæter; Anette H Ranhoff; Jan-Erik Gjertsen
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.