Literature DB >> 36056945

Comparison of AliveCor KardiaMobile Six-Lead ECG with Standard ECG in Pediatric Patients.

Zachary P Girvin1, Eric S Silver2, Leonardo Liberman3.   

Abstract

The AliveCor KardiaMobile (ACKM) is a remote electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring device. Little research has been conducted on its accuracy with pediatric patients. This prospective study aims to compare the ACKM six-lead device with a standard fifteen-lead ECG in measuring the QTc, QRS, and axis in pediatric patients. Pediatric patients ages 5 to 21 years were enrolled prospectively to have their ECG recorded using an ACKM six-lead device following a recording with the standard 15-lead ECG. A pediatric electrophysiologist measured the QTc, QRS interval, and QRS axis for both ECGs. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess agreement among measurements. The study included 141 patients. The mean age was 12.3 ± 4.4 years. Average heart rate was 79 ± 16 bpm. The mean difference in the QTc measurements for a paired standard ECG and ACKM was - 0.6 ms [95% confidence interval - 48 to 47 ms]. Of the ACKM QTc measurements, 117 (83%) were within 30 ms of the standard ECG. The mean difference in paired QRS measurements was - 1.3 ms [95% confidence interval - 23 to 21 ms]. Of the ACKM QRS measurements, 134 (95%) were within 20 ms of the standard ECG. The measured axis was the same for 84% of ACKM and standard ECGs. Over 80% of the ACKM six-lead ECGs produced QTc, QRS, and axis deviation measurements within a clinically useful range of the standard ECG. However, it is not accurate enough to be used consistently in place of a standard ECG for QTc and QRS measurement for pediatric patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pediatrics; QTc interval; Smartphone ECG

Year:  2022        PMID: 36056945     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-022-02998-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.838


  11 in total

1.  Comparison between a 6‑lead smartphone ECG and 12‑lead ECG in athletes.

Authors:  Jessica J Orchard; John W Orchard; Hariharan Raju; Andre La Gerche; Rajesh Puranik; Chris Semsarian
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  QTC intervals can be assessed with the AliveCor heart monitor in patients on dofetilide for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Eugene H Chung; Kimberly D Guise
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Prospective blinded Evaluation of the smartphone-based AliveCor Kardia ECG monitor for Atrial Fibrillation detection: The PEAK-AF study.

Authors:  Felix K Wegner; Simon Kochhäuser; Christian Ellermann; Philipp S Lange; Gerrit Frommeyer; Patrick Leitz; Lars Eckardt; Dirk G Dechering
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Assessment of Remote Heart Rhythm Sampling Using the AliveCor Heart Monitor to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: The REHEARSE-AF Study.

Authors:  Julian P J Halcox; Kathie Wareham; Antonia Cardew; Mark Gilmore; James P Barry; Ceri Phillips; Michael B Gravenor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Comparison of QT Interval Readings in Normal Sinus Rhythm Between a Smartphone Heart Monitor and a 12-Lead ECG for Healthy Volunteers and Inpatients Receiving Sotalol or Dofetilide.

Authors:  Paul Garabelli; Stavros Stavrakis; Michael Albert; Edward Koomson; Purvi Parwani; Jawad Chohan; Landgrave Smith; David Albert; Rongsheng Xie; Qiying Xie; Dwight Reynolds; Sunny Po
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-04-29

6.  A Smartphone Application to Diagnose the Mechanism of Pediatric Supraventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Dina J Ferdman; Leonardo Liberman; Eric S Silver
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  SPEAR Trial: Smartphone Pediatric ElectrocARdiogram Trial.

Authors:  Hoang H Nguyen; George F Van Hare; Michael Rudokas; Tammy Bowman; Jennifer N A Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The future of remote ECG monitoring systems.

Authors:  Shu-Li Guo; Li-Na Han; Hong-Wei Liu; Quan-Jin Si; De-Feng Kong; Fu-Su Guo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Can smartphone wireless ECGs be used to accurately assess ECG intervals in pediatrics? A comparison of mobile health monitoring to standard 12-lead ECG.

Authors:  Melanie R F Gropler; Aarti S Dalal; George F Van Hare; Jennifer N Avari Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  First real-world experience with mobile health telemonitoring in adult patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  M A C Koole; D Kauw; M M Winter; D A J Dohmen; I I Tulevski; R de Haan; G A Somsen; M P Schijven; D Robbers-Visser; B J M Mulder; B J Bouma; M J Schuuring
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.