| Literature DB >> 36056275 |
Sándor Csaba Aranyi1, Zita Képes2, Marianna Nagy3, Gábor Opposits2, Ildikó Garai2,4, Miklós Káplár5, Miklós Emri2.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is reported to cause widespread changes in brain function, leading to cognitive impairments. Research using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data already aims to understand functional changes in complex brain connectivity systems. However, no previous studies with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) tried to investigate large-scale effective connectivity in diabetes. We aimed to examine the differences in large-scale resting state networks in diabetic and obese patients using combined DCM and graph theory methodologies. With the participation of 70 subjects (43 diabetics, 27 obese), we used cross-spectra DCM to estimate connectivity between 36 regions, subdivided into seven resting networks (RSN) commonly recognized in the literature. We assessed group-wise connectivity of T2DM and obesity, as well as group differences, with parametric empirical Bayes and Bayesian model reduction techniques. We analyzed network connectivity globally, between RSNs, and regionally. We found that average connection strength was higher in T2DM globally and between RSNs, as well. On the network level, the salience network shows stronger total within-network connectivity in diabetes (8.07) than in the obese group (4.02). Regionally, we measured the most significant average decrease in the right middle temporal gyrus (-0.013 Hz) and the right inferior parietal lobule (-0.01 Hz) relative to the obese group. In comparison, connectivity increased most notably in the left anterior prefrontal cortex (0.01 Hz) and the medial dorsal thalamus (0.009 Hz). In conclusion, we find the usage of complex analysis of large-scale networks suitable for diabetes instead of focusing on specific changes in brain function.Entities:
Keywords: Dynamic causal modelling; Effective connectivity; Graph theory; Obesity; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 36056275 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-022-00833-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comput Neurosci ISSN: 0929-5313 Impact factor: 1.453