Literature DB >> 36055210

Social and scientific motivations to move beyond groups in allele frequencies: The TOPMed experience.

Sarah C Nelson1, Stephanie M Gogarten2, Stephanie M Fullerton3, Carmen R Isasi4, Braxton D Mitchell5, Kari E North6, Stephen S Rich7, Matthew R G Taylor8, Sebastian Zöllner9, Tamar Sofer10.   

Abstract

For the genomics community, allele frequencies within defined groups (or "strata") are useful across multiple research and clinical contexts. Benefits include allowing researchers to identify populations for replication or "look up" studies, enabling researchers to compare population-specific frequencies to validate findings, and facilitating assessment of variant pathogenicity in clinical contexts. However, there are potential concerns with stratified allele frequencies. These include potential re-identification (determining whether or not an individual participated in a given research study based on allele frequencies and individual-level genetic data), harm from associating stigmatizing variants with specific groups, potential reification of race as a biological rather than a socio-political category, and whether presenting stratified frequencies-and the downstream applications that this presentation enables-is consistent with participants' informed consents. The NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program considered the scientific and social implications of different approaches for adding stratified frequencies to the TOPMed BRAVO (Browse All Variants Online) variant server. We recommend a novel approach of presenting ancestry-specific allele frequencies using a statistical method based upon local genetic ancestry inference. Notably, this approach does not require grouping individuals by either predominant global ancestry or race/ethnicity and, therefore, mitigates re-identification and other concerns as the mixture distribution of ancestral allele frequencies varies across the genome. Here we describe our considerations and approach, which can assist other genomics research programs facing similar issues of how to define and present stratified frequencies in publicly available variant databases.
Copyright © 2022 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allele frequencies; anti-racism; genetic ancestry; stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36055210      PMCID: PMC9502047          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.043


  37 in total

1.  Secondary uses and the governance of de-identified data: lessons from the human genome diversity panel.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fullerton; Sandra S-J Lee
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  RFMix: a discriminative modeling approach for rapid and robust local-ancestry inference.

Authors:  Brian K Maples; Simon Gravel; Eimear E Kenny; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Potential for revealing individual-level information in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Kenneth Rice
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Genetic research among the Havasupai--a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Robyn L Sterling
Journal:  Virtual Mentor       Date:  2011-02-01

5.  Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.

Authors:  S B Trinidad; S M Fullerton; E J Ludman; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; W Burke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genomic Research and American Indian Tribal Communities in Oklahoma: Learning From Past Research Misconduct and Building Future Trusting Partnerships.

Authors:  Jennifer Q Chadwick; Kenneth C Copeland; Dannielle E Branam; Julie A Erb-Alvarez; Sohail I Khan; Michael T Peercy; Mark E Rogers; Bobby R Saunkeah; Jeanie B Tryggestad; David F Wharton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Informed consent and other ethical issues in human population genetics.

Authors:  H T Greely
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Fine-scale population structure in the UK Biobank: implications for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  James P Cook; Anubha Mahajan; Andrew P Morris
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  The limits of individual identification from sample allele frequencies: theory and statistical analysis.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; William G Hill
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program.

Authors:  Daniel Taliun; Daniel N Harris; Michael D Kessler; Jedidiah Carlson; Zachary A Szpiech; Raul Torres; Sarah A Gagliano Taliun; André Corvelo; Stephanie M Gogarten; Hyun Min Kang; Achilleas N Pitsillides; Jonathon LeFaive; Seung-Been Lee; Xiaowen Tian; Brian L Browning; Sayantan Das; Anne-Katrin Emde; Wayne E Clarke; Douglas P Loesch; Amol C Shetty; Thomas W Blackwell; Albert V Smith; Quenna Wong; Xiaoming Liu; Matthew P Conomos; Dean M Bobo; François Aguet; Christine Albert; Alvaro Alonso; Kristin G Ardlie; Dan E Arking; Stella Aslibekyan; Paul L Auer; John Barnard; R Graham Barr; Lucas Barwick; Lewis C Becker; Rebecca L Beer; Emelia J Benjamin; Lawrence F Bielak; John Blangero; Michael Boehnke; Donald W Bowden; Jennifer A Brody; Esteban G Burchard; Brian E Cade; James F Casella; Brandon Chalazan; Daniel I Chasman; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Michael H Cho; Seung Hoan Choi; Mina K Chung; Clary B Clish; Adolfo Correa; Joanne E Curran; Brian Custer; Dawood Darbar; Michelle Daya; Mariza de Andrade; Dawn L DeMeo; Susan K Dutcher; Patrick T Ellinor; Leslie S Emery; Celeste Eng; Diane Fatkin; Tasha Fingerlin; Lukas Forer; Myriam Fornage; Nora Franceschini; Christian Fuchsberger; Stephanie M Fullerton; Soren Germer; Mark T Gladwin; Daniel J Gottlieb; Xiuqing Guo; Michael E Hall; Jiang He; Nancy L Heard-Costa; Susan R Heckbert; Marguerite R Irvin; Jill M Johnsen; Andrew D Johnson; Robert Kaplan; Sharon L R Kardia; Tanika Kelly; Shannon Kelly; Eimear E Kenny; Douglas P Kiel; Robert Klemmer; Barbara A Konkle; Charles Kooperberg; Anna Köttgen; Leslie A Lange; Jessica Lasky-Su; Daniel Levy; Xihong Lin; Keng-Han Lin; Chunyu Liu; Ruth J F Loos; Lori Garman; Robert Gerszten; Steven A Lubitz; Kathryn L Lunetta; Angel C Y Mak; Ani Manichaikul; Alisa K Manning; Rasika A Mathias; David D McManus; Stephen T McGarvey; James B Meigs; Deborah A Meyers; Julie L Mikulla; Mollie A Minear; Braxton D Mitchell; Sanghamitra Mohanty; May E Montasser; Courtney Montgomery; Alanna C Morrison; Joanne M Murabito; Andrea Natale; Pradeep Natarajan; Sarah C Nelson; Kari E North; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Nicholette D Palmer; Nathan Pankratz; Gina M Peloso; Patricia A Peyser; Jacob Pleiness; Wendy S Post; Bruce M Psaty; D C Rao; Susan Redline; Alexander P Reiner; Dan Roden; Jerome I Rotter; Ingo Ruczinski; Chloé Sarnowski; Sebastian Schoenherr; David A Schwartz; Jeong-Sun Seo; Sudha Seshadri; Vivien A Sheehan; Wayne H Sheu; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Nicholas L Smith; Jennifer A Smith; Nona Sotoodehnia; Adrienne M Stilp; Weihong Tang; Kent D Taylor; Marilyn Telen; Timothy A Thornton; Russell P Tracy; David J Van Den Berg; Ramachandran S Vasan; Karine A Viaud-Martinez; Scott Vrieze; Daniel E Weeks; Bruce S Weir; Scott T Weiss; Lu-Chen Weng; Cristen J Willer; Yingze Zhang; Xutong Zhao; Donna K Arnett; Allison E Ashley-Koch; Kathleen C Barnes; Eric Boerwinkle; Stacey Gabriel; Richard Gibbs; Kenneth M Rice; Stephen S Rich; Edwin K Silverman; Pankaj Qasba; Weiniu Gan; George J Papanicolaou; Deborah A Nickerson; Sharon R Browning; Michael C Zody; Sebastian Zöllner; James G Wilson; L Adrienne Cupples; Cathy C Laurie; Cashell E Jaquish; Ryan D Hernandez; Timothy D O'Connor; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 69.504

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.