Literature DB >> 36054599

The Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults' Perceptions of Virtual Care: Qualitative Study.

Lama Abdallah1, Paul Stolee1, Kimberly J Lopez2, Alexandra Whate1, Jennifer Boger3, Catherine Tong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults worldwide have increasingly received health care virtually, and health care organizations and professional bodies have indicated that virtual care is "here to stay." As older adults are the highest users of the health care system, virtual care implementation can have a significant impact on them and may pose a need for additional support.
OBJECTIVE: This research aims to understand older adults' perspectives and experiences of virtual care during the pandemic.
METHODS: As part of a larger study on older adults' technology use during the pandemic, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 diverse older Canadians (mean age 76.9 years, SD 6.5) at 2 points: summer of 2020 and winter/early spring of 2021. Participants were asked about their technology skills, experiences with virtual appointments, and perspectives on this type of care delivery. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. A combination of team-based and framework analyses was used to interpret the data.
RESULTS: Participants described their experiences with both in-person and virtual care during the pandemic, including issues with accessing care and long gaps between appointments. Overall, participants were generally satisfied with the virtual care they received during the pandemic. Participants described the benefits of virtual care (eg, increased convenience, efficiency, and safety), the limitations of virtual care (eg, need for physical examination and touch, lack of nonverbal communication, difficulties using technology, and systemic barriers in access), and their perspectives on the future of virtual care. Half of our participants preferred a return to in-person care after the COVID-19 pandemic, while the other half preferred a combination of in-person and virtual services. Many participants who preferred to access in-person services were not opposed to virtual care options, as needed; however, they wanted virtual care as an option alongside in-person care. Participants emphasized a need for training and support to be meaningfully implemented to support both older adults and providers in using virtual care.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our research identified both perceived benefits and perceived limitations of virtual care, and older adult participants emphasized their wish for a hybrid model of virtual care, in which virtual care is viewed as an addendum, not a replacement for in-person care. We recognize the limitations of our sample (small, not representative of all older Canadians, and more likely to use technology); this body of literature would greatly benefit from more research with older adults who do not/cannot use technology to receive care. Findings from this study can be mobilized as part of broader efforts to support older patients and providers engaged in virtual and in-person care, particularly post-COVID-19. ©Lama Abdallah, Paul Stolee, Kimberly J Lopez, Alexandra Whate, Jennifer Boger, Catherine Tong. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 20.10.2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; aging; digital care; elderly population; older adult; patient perspective; qualitative; technology access; technology usability; telehealth; virtual care

Year:  2022        PMID: 36054599      PMCID: PMC9586256          DOI: 10.2196/38546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Aging        ISSN: 2561-7605


  28 in total

1.  Analyzing older users' home telehealth services acceptance behavior-applying an Extended UTAUT model.

Authors:  Miha Cimperman; Maja Makovec Brenčič; Peter Trkman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Using Framework Analysis in nursing research: a worked example.

Authors:  Deborah J Ward; Christine Furber; Stephanie Tierney; Veronica Swallow
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Assessing Telemedicine Unreadiness Among Older Adults in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kenneth Lam; Amy D Lu; Ying Shi; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail.

Authors:  T Koch
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The use of technology for mental healthcare delivery among older adults with depressive symptoms: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Boniface Harerimana; Cheryl Forchuk; Tony O'Regan
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 6.  Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research.

Authors:  Stephen J Gentles; Cathy Charles; David B Nicholas; Jenny Ploeg; K Ann McKibbon
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-11

7.  Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care.

Authors:  Victoria Hammersley; Eddie Donaghy; Richard Parker; Hannah McNeilly; Helen Atherton; Annemieke Bikker; John Campbell; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Paul Webster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  COVID-19 Virtual Care for the Geriatric Population: Exploring Two Sides of the Coin.

Authors:  Helen Senderovich; Shaira Wignarajah
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.