| Literature DB >> 36052377 |
Fanfan Tang1, Jingtao Song2, Tanxing Cai3, Zhao Lei2, Feizhou Huang2, Yina Hu4, Gang Deng2.
Abstract
Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease; biliary complications are important cause of death in posttransplant patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has an irreplaceable role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with biliary tract disease.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36052377 PMCID: PMC9427298 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4498443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 1.919
Figure 1Surgical procedure of ERCP in the treatment of biliary strictures after liver transplantation. (a) Before ERCP, cholangiography showed biliary strictures; (b) the Boston zebra guide wire was placed into the intrahepatic bile duct; (c) the plastic stent was successfully placed with balloon dilator; (d) metal stent placed successfully.
The characteristics and clinical details of study subjects.
| Items |
|
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 33 (89.2) |
| Female | 4 (10.8) |
| Age (years) | 46.54 ± 10.05 |
| 18~39 | 8 (21.6) |
| 40~59 | 26 (70.3) |
| 60~70 | 3 (8.1) |
| Type of pretransplant disease | |
| Liver failure | 7 (18.9) |
| Cirrhotic decompensation | 16 (43.2) |
| Alcoholic liver disease | 4 (10.8) |
| Liver cancer | 7 (18.9) |
| Others | 3 (8.1) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.20 ± 2.01 |
| <18.5 | 20 (54.1) |
| 18.5~24.0 | 16 (43.2) |
| >24.0 | 1 (2.7) |
| Chronic disease conditions | |
| Yes | 17 (45.9) |
| No | 20 (54.1) |
| Type of first ERCP stent placement | |
| Metal stent | 11 (29.7) |
| Plastic stent | 26 (70.3) |
| Time to first stricture after LT (months) | |
| <3 | 22 (59.5) |
| 3~ | 11 (29.7) |
| 6~ | 2 (5.4) |
| 12~ | 2 (5.4) |
| EST | |
| Yes | 7 (18.9) |
| No | 30 (81.1) |
The comparison of WBC, TBIL, and DBIL.
| Items | Preoperative | 3 days postoperative | 7 days postoperative | Friedman |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC: (×109/L) | 7.90 | 5.95 | 6.24 | 7.946 | 0.019 |
| TBIL: | 113.90 | 54.90 | 35.66 | 42.541 | <0.001 |
| DBIL: | 82.50 | 37.60 | 25.10 | 45.622 | <0.001 |
The pair-wise comparison of WBC, TBIL, and DBIL.
| Comparison group |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| WBC | ||
| 3 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -1.079 | 0.281 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -2.678 | 0.007 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. 3 days postoperative | -1.727 | 0.084 |
| TBIL | ||
| 3 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -4.247 | <0.001 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -4.337 | <0.001 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. 3 days postoperative | -4.081 | <0.001 |
| DBIL | ||
| 3 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -4.232 | <0.001 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. preoperative | -4.458 | <0.001 |
| 7 days postoperative vs. 3 days postoperative | -4.271 | <0.001 |
∗Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Effect of MS and PS on RBO and adverse events.
| Groups | RBO | Adverse events | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| MS | 1 (9.1) | 10 (90.9) | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) |
| PS | 9 (34.6) | 17 (65.4) | 7 (26.9) | 19 (73.1) |
|
| 0.224 | 0.143 | ||
P ∗: Fisher's exact test.
Effect of EST on RBO and adverse events.
| EST | RBO | Adverse events | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | 7 (100.0) | 6 (85.7) | 1 (14.3) |
| No | 10 (33.3) | 20 (66.7) | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) |
|
| 0.155 | 0.004 | ||
P ∗: Fisher's exact test.