Literature DB >> 3605224

Phenotypic variation in male-transmitted fragile X: genetic inferences.

D Z Loesch, D A Hay, G R Sutherland, J Halliday, C Judge, G C Webb.   

Abstract

Three families with confirmed and one family with suspected male transmission of the fragile X are presented, with psychological and physical assessment of all available members. The psychological tests used were the Peabody Picture Vocabulary test and Block Design which measured verbal and non-verbal abilities, respectively. Physical status was assessed by recording dysmorphic features and by anthropometric measurements. This study demonstrated that there are appreciable differences in mental and physical status within sibships of daughters of male carriers, as well as recognizable physical alterations and intellectual impairment in the transmitting males. These findings contradict the concept that there are two distinct categories of fragile X carriers: phenotypically normal as opposed to affected. They suggest instead that the defect may be graded and emphasize the importance of intellectual deficits and physical alterations in defining the fragile X phenotype, both in low-penetrant males and female heterozygotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3605224     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320270219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  16 in total

1.  Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  F Tassone; R J Hagerman; A K Taylor; L W Gane; T E Godfrey; P J Hagerman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Fixed and random effects in the variation of the finger ridge count: a study of fragile-X families.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R M Huggins
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Dissociation between mental retardation and fragile site expression in a family with fragile X-linked mental retardation.

Authors:  M A Voelckel; M G Mattei; C N'Guyen; N Philip; F Birg; J F Mattei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Study of a family with a fragile site of the X chromosome at Xq27-28 without mental retardation.

Authors:  M A Voelckel; N Philip; C Piquet; M C Pellissier; I Oberlé; F Birg; M G Mattei; J F Mattei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Methylation status of genes flanking the fragile site in males with the fragile-X syndrome: a test of the imprinting hypothesis.

Authors:  M M Khalifa; A L Reiss; B R Migeon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Clinical features and reproductive patterns in fragile X female heterozygotes.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; D A Hay
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; L J Sheffield; D A Hay
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Auditory brain-stem responses in the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  T Arinami; M Sato; S Nakajima; I Kondo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Evidence that methylation of the FMR-I locus is responsible for variable phenotypic expression of the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; A M Lachiewicz; G A Spiridigliozzi; J Tarleton; S Schoenwald; M C Phelan; P Goonewardena; X Ding; W T Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; D A Hay; A K Gedeon; J C Mulley; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.