| Literature DB >> 36051924 |
Qian Zhang1, Yingchun Song1, Shengguang Chen2, Zhongwei Lv1.
Abstract
In order to analyze the expression level of zinc finger matrin-type protein 4 (ZMAT4) gene in T cells of thyroid carcinoma (TC) tissue and its clinical significance to prognosis of patients based on bioinformatics and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 389 TC patients with ZMAT4 gene and its corresponding survival and prognosis are searched by the Cancer Genome Atlas database. The expression of ZMAT4 gene is compared between normal thyroid tissue and TC tissue by RT-PCR. The relationship between ZMAT4 expression levels and clinicopathological parameters and baseline data is analyzed. The experimental results show that the low expression of ZMAT4 gene has an important relationship with the development of thyroid cancer, and real-time monitoring of ZMAT4 gene in TC patients can effectively evaluate the prognosis of patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051924 PMCID: PMC9410845 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9884155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Technology roadmap.
Comparison of ZMTA4 expression levels.
| Group | Number | ZMTA4 |
|---|---|---|
| TC group | 389 | 0.27 ± 0.16 |
| Control group | 76 | 16.43 ± 2.32 |
|
| – | 17.231 |
|
| – | <0.0001 |
Relationship between ZMAT4 gene expression levels and clinical case characteristics.
| Number ( | High expression group | Low expression group |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.092 | 0.762 | ||||
| Male | 176 | 87 (49.43%) | 88 (50.57%) | – | – | |
| Female | 213 | 102 (47.89%) | 111 (52.11%) | – | – | |
| Age (years) | 1.032 | 0.310 | ||||
| ≥40 | 113 | 65 (57.52%) | 48 (42.48%) | – | – | |
| <40 | 276 | 174 (63.04%) | 102 (36.96%) | – | – | |
| TNM stage | – | – | – | 6.392 | 0.004 | |
| I | 134 | 30 (22.39%) | 104 (77.61%) | – | – | |
| II | 104 | 29 (27.88%) | 75 (72.12%) | – | – | |
| III | 76 | 17 (22.37%) | 59 (77.63%) | – | – | |
| IV | 75 | 20 (26.67%) | 55 (73.33%) | – | – | |
| Histological type | – | – | – | 8.242 | <0.001 | |
| Papillary carcinoma | 214 | 45 (21.03%) | 169 (78.97%) | – | – | |
| Follicular carcinoma | 125 | 49 (39.20%) | 76 (60.80%) | – | – | |
| Tall columnar cell carcinoma | 38 | 6 (17.14%) | 32 (84.21%) | – | – | |
| Other | 12 | 2 (16.67%) | 10 (83.33%) | – | – | |
| N staging | – | – | – | 8.222 | 0.004 | |
| N0 | 238 | 81 (34.03%) | 157 (65.97%) | – | – | |
| N1 | 147 | 30 (20.41%) | 117 (79.59%) | – | – | |
| M staging | – | – | – | 0.252 | 0.616 | |
| M0 | 265 | 18 (6.79%) | 247 (93.21%) | – | – | |
| M1 | 9 | 1 (11.11%) | 8 (88.89%) | – | – | |
| Tumor diameter(cm) | – | – | – | 0.463 | 0.496 | |
| ≥4 | 92 | 16 (17.39%) | 76 (82.61%) | – | – | |
| <4 | 297 | 43 (14.48%) | 254 (85.52%) | – | – | |
| The degree of cure | – | – | – | 5.294 | 0.163 | |
| R0 | 286 | 218 (76.22%) | 68 (23.78%) | – | – | |
| R1, R2 | 68 | 46 (67.65%) | 22 (32.35%) | – | – | |
| Rx | 35 | 27 (77.14%) | 8 (22.86%) | – | – | |
Figure 2Survival curve.
Figure 3The survival rate of TNM stage I-II patients with different ZMAT4 expression levels.
Figure 4The survival rate of TNM stage III-IV patients with different ZMAT4 expression levels.
Figure 5The prognosis and survival of patients with different ZMAT4 expression levels in papillary carcinoma.
Figure 6The prognosis and survival of patients with different ZMAT4 expression levels in N0 stage.
The diagnostic efficacy.
| 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC | Cutoff value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMAT4 | 0.770–0.923 | 82.10 | 88.30 | 0.847 | 0.653 |
Figure 7ROC evaluation of the prognostic value of ZMAT4 gene for TC patients.