Literature DB >> 36051810

Anthropometric assessment of human auricle in North Indian population.

Abhishek Bahadur Singh1, Prerna Gupta2, Pankaj Singh3.   

Abstract

Introduction: Morphometric studies of the auricle find its place in many areas, such as esthetics, forensic medicine, biology, anthropology, mythology, arts, and acupuncture. Aims and Objective: This study aims at establishing the anatomical variations in the auricular dimensions in North Indian population. The objectives of this study were to measure auricle height in males and females, to measure auricle width in both sexes, to measure lobular height (LH) in both sexes, to measure lobular width (LW) in both sexes, to calculate the auricle index in both sexes, and to calculate lobular index in both sexes. Materials and
Methods: This study was conducted on 130 subjects (78 males and 52 females), in the age group of 18-25 years, without history of genetic disorders, injuries, or any disease of the auricle.
Results: The average length of the auricle was 6.28 cm (right) and 6.23 cm (left), and the average width was 3.21 cm (right) and 3.28 cm (left). The average height of the lobule was 1.76 cm and 1.77 cm on the right and left sides, respectively, while the lobule width was 1.90 cm on the right side and 2.01 cm on the left side.
Conclusion: Total right auricle height and total auricle width of both the right and left ears are more in males as compared to females, and the difference between both the sides was significant. Both right- and left-side LH and LW were higher in males as compared to females. Copyright:
© 2022 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auricle; external ear; lobule; morphometry; types of the auricle

Year:  2022        PMID: 36051810      PMCID: PMC9426708          DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_347_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0975-5950


INTRODUCTION

The appearance of an individual or facial esthesis is determined by the size, shape, position, symmetry, and projection of the auricle of the external ear.[1] Many congenital and acquired defects occur in the auricle. Congenital anomalies occurring are microtia, macrotia, malposed ear, accessory auricle, lop ear, and protruding ear which may be associated with various syndromes such as Down's, Turner's, and Potter's syndromes.[2] Traumatic injuries like burns and pathological condition such as carcinoma of the pinna account for acquired defect in the external ear. Dimensions of the normal auricle are thus required to correct these deformities. A lot of variations exist in the dimensions of the pinna in different age, sex, and ethnic groups in different parts of the world. It has also been seen that a lot of difference in morphometry exists between the right and left ears in the same individual.[3] Parameters of the ear lobule are important for plastic surgeons, and reconstructive surgeries of the ear, and for facial rejuvenation. Knowledge of the ear pinna is used for manufacturing ear microphones and for designing ear prosthesis.[4] The forensic expert also needs the dimensions of the ear pinna in making the identity of an individual.[5] Since the morphometric measurements of the auricle differ in various ethnic groups, and India is a country with diverse races, this study is being done in North Indian population to further substantiate the available data for morphometry of the external ear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study, conducted in the Department of E. N. T, King George Medical University, Lucknow, and Department of Anatomy, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, in 130 medical students, in which 78 were males and 52 were females in the age group of 18–25 years. Institutional ethical clearance and written consent were taken from the subjects after informing them about the study. Ethical Clearance was Obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee vide letter no IRC/IIMSR/2021/03 dated 17.03.2021. Subjects with history of craniofacial trauma and congenital ear anomalies were excluded from the study. The linear measurements of the human auricle were done with the help of digital Vernier caliper. All the measurements of the auricle were based on international standards.[6789] The following parameters were measured keeping the subject's head in Frankfurt horizontal plane [Figure 1]:
Figure 1

Dimensions of ears (auricle and lobule height and width)

Dimensions of ears (auricle and lobule height and width) Total auricle height (TAH) = Distance between the inferior projection of the ear lobule and the superior projection of the helix Total auricle width (TAW) = From the root of the auricle to the maximum convexity of the auricle helix Auricle index (AI) = TAW/TAH ×100 Lobular height (LH) = Distance between the inferior end of the lobule and the base of the tragal notch Lobular width (LW) = Horizontal width of the ear lobule Lobular index (LI) = LW/LH ×100. All the data were tabulated and analyzed statistically using simple t-test and paired t-test.

RESULTS

The readings of all parameters of both the right and left ears of all the subjects are shown in Tables1-3.
Table 1

Comparison of right and left ear measurements of all subjects

ParametersMean±SD P ConclusionInference

Right (cm)Left (cm)
Auricle height6.28±0.486.23±0.480.019<0.05Significant
Auricle width3.31±0.443.28±0.390.29>0.05Not significant
Auricle index52.66±6.0752.66±5.931.00>0.05Not significant
Lobular height1.76±0.311.77±0.290.68>0.05Not significant
Lobular width1.90±0.342.01±0.360.00<0.05Significant
Lobular index109.59±20.28115.15±20.050.01<0.05Significant

SD: Standard deviation

Table 3

Comparison of right and left ear measurements of female

ParametersRight (cm)Left (cm) P ConclusionInference
Auricle height5.99±0.405.91±0.390.007<0.05Significant
Auricle width3.04±0.343.05±0.380.97>0.05Not significant
Auricle index50.91±5.5151.70±6.210.41>0.05Not significant
Lobular height1.67±0.291.75±0.310.03<0.05Significant
Lobular width1.82±0.351.98±0.350.20>0.05Not significant
Lobular index110.24±20.87115.39±21.860.10>0.05Not significant
Comparison of right and left ear measurements of all subjects SD: Standard deviation Comparison of right and left ear measurements of male SD: Standard deviation Comparison of right and left ear measurements of female According to Table 1, TAH is higher in the right ear, whereas LH, LW, AI, and LI were higher in the left ear. According to Table 2, TAH and TAW measurements were higher in the right ear, whereas LH, LW, AI, and LI were higher in the left ear.
Table 2

Comparison of right and left ear measurements of male

ParametersMean±SD P ConclusionInference

Right (cm)Left (cm)
Auricle height6.29±0.486.23±0.480.011<0.05Significant
Auricle width3.31±0.453.28±0.390.35>0.05Not significant
Auricle index52.69±6.1252.79±5.870.85>0.05Not significant
Lobular height1.76±0.311.77±0.300.68>0.05Not significant
Lobular width1.90±0.342.02±0.360.30>0.05Not significant
Lobular index109.55±20.42115.34±22.160.005<0.05Significant

SD: Standard deviation

According to Table 3, TAH measurements were higher in the right ear, whereas TAW, LH, LW, AI, and LI were higher in the left ear. According to Table 4, all the parameters of both right and left were more in males as compared to females, except right and left lobular indexes, which was higher in females as compared to males.
Table 4

Comparison of male and female ear measurements

ParametersMaleFemale P ConclusionInference
Right auricle height6.29±0.485.99±0.400.002<0.05Significant
Right auricle width3.31±0.453.04±0.340.001>0.05Not significant
Right auricle index52.69±6.1250.91±5.510.006<0.05Significant
Right lobular height1.76±0.311.67±0.290.006<0.05Significant
Right lobular width1.90±0.341.82±0.350.012<0.05Significant
Right lobular index109.55±20.42110.24±20.870.398>0.05Not significant
Left auricle height6.23±0.485.91±0.392.24>0.05Not significant
Left auricle width3.28±0.393.05±0.385.74>0.05Not significant
Left auricle index52.79±5.8751.70±6.210.18>0.05Not significant
Left lobular height1.77±0.301.75±0.310.39>0.05Not significant
Left lobular width2.02±0.361.98±0.350.40>0.05Not significant
Left lobular index115.34±22.16115.39±21.860.93>0.05Not significant
Comparison of male and female ear measurements

DISCUSSION

TAH helps in the evaluation of congenital anomalies (Down's syndrome).[1011] In a study on North American whites, it was observed that the total height of the left ear was 62.4 mm in men and 58.5 mm in women. In a study done by Asai et al. in Japanese population, the measurement of the left ear height was found to be 70.1 mm.[12] In Bozkir et al.'s study, the height of the left ear was 63.1 mm in men and 59.7 mm in women.[13] In Praveen et al.'s study, the total ear height of the left ear in males was 6.06 cm and 5.88 cm in females.[14] In the present study, the TAH of the left ear in males is 6.23 cm and 5.91 cm in females, whereas the TAH of the right ear in males is 6.29 cm and 5.99 cm in females. Similar results were also found in a study done by Barut and Aktunc. It was thus concluded by many studies and also the present study that the mean height of the ears on both the sides was higher in males as compared to females.[15] In the study of Bozkir et al., the ear width in males was 33.3 mm on the left side and 33.1 mm on the right side, whereas in females, it was 31.3 mm in the left ear and 31.2 mm in the right ear.[13] According to Balogh and Millesi, the ear width in males was 32.4 mm in the left ear and 33 mm in the right ear, whereas in females, it was 31.9 mm in the left ear and 32.4 mm in the right ear.[16] In the study of Praveen et al., the ear width in males for the right ear was 3.07 cm, and for the left ear, it was 3.06 cm. In females, the ear width for the right ear was 2.89 cm, and for the left ear, it was 2.87 cm.[14] In the present study, the auricle width of the right ear in males is 3.31 cm, and for the left ear, it is 3.28 cm. In females, it is 3.04 cm in the right ear and 3.05 cm in the left ear. The result of the present study is almost similar to the previous studies wherein the auricle width of both the sides is more in males as compared to females. According to Praveen et al.,[14] right LH and right LW are more in males as compared to females, but left LH and left LW are more in females as compared to males.[12] According to the present study, both right- and left-side LH and LW are higher in males as compared to females. The dimensions of the ear lobule reported in studies done by Brucker et al. and Azaria et al.[617] vary from 13 mm to 25 mm. In the present study, the length of the ear lobule on the right side was found to be around 1.76 cm in males and 1.67 cm in females and the width of the ear lobule on the right side was found to be around 1.90 cm in males and 1.82 cm in females. The length of the ear lobule on the left side was found to be around 1.77 cm in males and 1.75 cm in females, and the width of the ear lobule on the left side was found to be around 2.02 cm in males and 1.98 cm in females.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides normal human auricle dimensions, which is important for the diagnosis of congenital malformations, acquired deformities, and various syndromes. These data are also helpful for plastic surgeons in reconstruction of the pinna. The morphometric parameter of the auricle gives information about sex of the person which plays an important role in the forensic investigation. These data also provide the mean values of the different morphometric parameters of the right and left auricles of the medical students in North Indian population. Right TAH and TAW of both the right and left ears are more in males as compared to females, and the difference between both the sides was significant. Both right- and left-side LH and LW were higher in males as compared to females.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  12 in total

1.  Anthropometric measurements of the external ear in a group of Turkish primary school students.

Authors:  Cagatay Barut; Erol Aktunc
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Morphometry of the external ear in our adult population.

Authors:  M Gülhal Bozkir; Pinar Karakaş; Metin Yavuz; Fahri Dere
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Why do old men have big ears? Correlation of ear length with age in Japan.

Authors:  Y Asai; M Yoshimura; N Nago; T Yamada
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-02

4.  Measurement of ear length in neonates, infants and preschool children in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Te Chou; Ya-Chun Tseng; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Chiu-Shong Liu; Ching-Tien Peng; Chang-Hai Tsai
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Taiwan       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

5.  Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears?

Authors:  B Balogh; H Millesi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Management of the ear in rhytidectomy.

Authors:  P McKinney; S Giese; O Placik
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: a study of 547 subjects and clinical application.

Authors:  R Azaria; N Adler; R Silfen; D Regev; D J Hauben
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Anthropometry of the normal human auricle: a study of adult Indian men.

Authors:  Ruma Purkait; Priyanka Singh
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  A morphometric study of the external ear: age- and sex-related differences.

Authors:  Michael J Brucker; Jagruti Patel; Patrick K Sullivan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Anthropometric Assessment of the Normal Adult Human Ear.

Authors:  Sharanbasappa R Japatti; Priyanka J Engineer; B Manjunatha Reddy; Akash U Tiwari; Chidambar Y Siddegowda; Reshma B Hammannavar
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.