| Literature DB >> 36051791 |
Neville Jf1, Mandar Tilak2, Janani Anand Kumar3, Nitesh Mishra1, Akhilesh Kumar Singh3, Naresh Sharma3, Farhan Durrani3.
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of the study was to examine the feasibility of bi-paddled pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap reconstruction in patient undergoing full thickness composite resection. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Bi-paddled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap; oral cavity; squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051791 PMCID: PMC9426701 DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_374_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Natl J Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 0975-5950
Figure 1Pre operative photos of a patient having Squamous cell carcinoma of Right Gingivo-Buccal Sulcus from angle of mouth to Retromolar trigone region with overlying skin involvement (Post NACT 3 cycles). Note that patient is having trismus due to involvement of masticator spaces
Figure 4PMMC flap marking preserving the blood supply for delto-pectoral flap, which can be utilized for secondary surgery if needed
Figure 3Marking for Bi-paddled PMMC flap based on the perforators of pectoral branch of Thoracoacromial artery with preservation of nipple; the random pattern of the flap is marked with asterisk
Figure 5Marking showing Bi –paddled PMMC flap to be harvested with marked central area that has to be de-epithelised before inset
Figure 6Post operative photograph of patient showing Closure of Bi-paddled PMMC flap sutured to the defect with minimal tension
Figure 7Primary closure of the donor site following harvest of Bi-paddled PMMC flap, Closure resembling the shape of tongue
Demographic data
| Patient characteristics | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Total no of patients | 231 | 100 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 219 | 94.8 |
| Female | 12 | 5.2 |
| Age (years) | ||
| Mean | 49.5yr(+/-5.36) | NA |
| Median | 49 (38-69) yrs | NA |
| Stage | ||
| IVA | 231 | 100 |
| Preoperative treatment group | ||
| Upfront cases | 133 | 57.6 |
| Post NACT cases | 79 | 34.2 |
| Recurrent cases | 19 | 8.2 |
| Site of disease | ||
| Lower Alveolus | 145 | 62.8 |
| Buccal Mucosa | 78 | 33.8 |
| Lower alveolus extending beyond midline | 8 | 3.5 |
| Addiction | ||
| Tobacco chewing | 193 | 83.18 |
| Smoking | 112 | 48.27 |
| Co morbidities | ||
| Diabetes | 28 | 12.1 |
| Hypertension | 65 | 28.1 |
| Surgery done | ||
| FTWE + SM | 194 | 84 |
| FTWE + MM | 1 | 4 |
| BCR | 28 | 12.1 |
| FTWE + SM + AM | 8 | 3.5 |
| Titanium Plating | 70 | 30.17 |
| Hb (g/dl) | ||
| Mean | 12.28(+/-0.86) | |
| Median | 12.400 (10.9-13.9) | |
| Albumin (g/dl) | ||
| Mean | 3.85(+/-0.47 | |
| Median | 3.7 (2.6-4.6) |
FTWE: Full thickness wide excision involving skin + soft tissue + mucosa. SM – Segmental Mandibulectomy. BCR – Bite-Composite Resection. MM –Marginal Mandibulectomy
Late post operative data
| Number of patients | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 dysphagia | 136 | 58.87 |
| Grade 2 dysphagia | 74 | 32.03 |
| Grade 3 dysphagia | 21 | 9.09 |
| Post operative average mouth opening | Mean | 3.85cm(+/-0.8) |
| Median | 3.5cm (2.8-4.2) | |
| Day of starting oral feed | Mean | 23.3 (0.43) |
| Median | 21 (16-51) | |
| Day of adjuvant RT | Mean | 36.8(+/- 5.3) |
| Median | 36 (30-70) |
Overall complications/morbidity across various studies
| Author | Overall complications with PMMC flap |
|---|---|
| Patidar H | 23.07 |
| Jacob | 48.33 |
| Tripathi | 40% |
| Ahmad GQ | 34.04 |
| Bhola | 20.96 |
| Chaturvedi | 40.5% |
| Sahu | 33.3% |
| Mehta | 40.5% |
| Our study | 33.8% |
Comparison of early post operative complications in various studies.
| Complications | Our study | Jacob | Tripathi | Mehta | Shah | Vartanian |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full thickness total flap necrosis | 0.9 | 1.66 | 0 | 2.7 | 3 | 2.4% |
| Full thickness partial flap necrosis | 6.5 | 3.32 | 6.31 | 24.54 | 2 | 11.4% |
| Major suture dehiscence with OCF | 9.1 | 10 | 12.63 | 14.5 | 26 | 11.8% |
| Wound infection | 11.3 | 3.32 | 33.68 | 12.7 | 29 | 8.3% |
| Hematoma | 3.45 | - | 7.36 | 12.7 | - | - |
Flap dimensions
| Site | Average dimensions (length × width) in cm |
|---|---|
| Average -oral defect/mucosal defect | 5.9×4.2 |
| Average External skin defect | 6.1×4.2 |
| Average flap dimensions | 15.5×6.4 |
| Largest flap dimension | 21.5×7.5 |
| No of Cases where Nipple incorporation in flap | 14 |
| Average size of the random portion of the flap | 4.5×5.2 |
| Largest size of the random portion of the flap | 8×5.5 |
Early post-operative flap related complications
| Complications | number | percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Full thickness total flap necrosis | 2 | 0.9 |
| Full thickness Inner partial flap necrosis | 0 | 0.00 |
| Full thickness outer partial flap necrosis | 15 | 6.5 |
| Epithelial necrosis | 35 | 15.2 |
| Minor suture dehiscence | 32 | 13.9 |
| Major suture dehiscence with OCF | 21 | 9.1 |
| Wound infection | 26 | 11.3 |
| Flap debridement & re-suturing | 17 | 7.4 |
| Hematoma | 8 | 3.45 |
| Re-surgery with second flap used | 18 | 7.8 |
| Total flap related morbidity | 78 | 33.8 |
| ClavienDindo grade I | 22 | 9.5 |
| II | 161 | 69.7 |
| IIIA | 31 | 13.4 |
| IIIB | 17 | 7.4 |