| Literature DB >> 36051768 |
Wenqi Fan1,2, Pinpin Ji1,2, Xuwen Sun1,2, Min Kong1,2, Ning Zhou1,2, Qiang Zhang1,2, Ying Wang1,2, Qianqian Liu1,2, Xiaoxuan Li1,2, En-Min Zhou1,2, Qin Zhao1,2, Yani Sun1,2.
Abstract
Newcastle disease (ND) is an acute and highly contagious infectious disease found in poultry. Although commercial ND virus (NDV) vaccines are universally used, some case reports persistently documented vaccination failure. Therefore, novel strategies are still required to control the occurrence of the disease in chickens. Recently, nanobodies (Nbs), which have the advantages of small molecular weight and low production costs, have been shown to be promising therapeutics against viral infection. In the present study, a total of 16 Nbs against NDV nucleocapsid protein (NP) were screened from two libraries against NDV using phage display technology. Of the 16 screened Nbs, eight were prevented from binding to NDV NP protein through administering positive chicken sera for anti-NDV antibodies, indicating that the epitopes recognized by these eight Nbs were able to induce the immune response after the chickens were infected with NDV stock. Subsequently, transfection assay, construction of recombinant DF-1 cells capable of expressing different nanobodies and viral inhibition assay were used to screen the nanobodies inhibiting NDV replication. The results demonstrated that Nb18, Nb30, and Nb88 significantly inhibited the replication of Class I and different genotypes of Class II NDV strains in DF-1 cells when they were expressed in the cytoplasm. Collectively, these nanobodies provided new tools for researching the functions of NDV NP protein and may be used as a novel strategy for designing drugs against NDV infection in chickens.Entities:
Keywords: Newcastle disease virus; inhibition; nanobody; nucleocapsid protein; viral replication
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051768 PMCID: PMC9426676 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.956561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Primers used in this study.
| Primers | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| pLVX-Nbx-F ( | GGATCTATTTCCGGT | Constructions of recombinant pLVX-NDV-NP-Nbx plasmids |
| pLVX-Nbx-R ( | GGGATCCGCGGCCGC | |
| NDV-NP-F | GTRATGAGRAACCATGTTGC | qRT-PCR |
| NDV-NP-R | CACTCCTRTTGTTGAACTG | |
| NDV-NP-probe | GCAGGGAAACAGRATGAAGCCACA |
Enrichment of phage particles carrying NDV-NP-specific Nbs.
| Round of banning | Input phage (pfu/well) | P output phage (pfu/well) | N output phage (pfu/well) | Recovery (P/input) | P/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st round | 5 × 1010 | 1.15 × 106 | 3.11 × 106 | 2.3 × 10−3 | 0.369 |
| 2nd round | 5 × 1010 | 2.09 × 106 | 4 × 103 | 4.18 × 10−3 | 522.5 |
| 3rd round | 5 × 1010 | 2.23 × 106 | 0 | 4.46 × 10−3 | 2.23 × 106 |
Figure 1Screening of specific nanobodies against the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) NP protein. (A) Detection of the periplasmic extracts containing recombinant nanobodies from 96 clones reacting with NDV NP proteins with indirect ELISA. (B) Alignment of amino acid sequences of the 16 screened nanobodies. The frameworks and CDRs were labelled according to that described in a previous study, and the residues at positions 37, 44, 45, and 47 that are characteristic of nanobodies are indicated by the red arrows.
Figure 2Secreted expression of nanobodies with HRP fusion proteins against NDV NP protein in the HEK-293 T cells. (A) Detection of nanobodies with HRP fusion protein expressed in the HEK-293 T cells via IFA using anti-HA mAbs as primary antibodies. HEK-293 T cells transfected with pCMV-N1-Nb13-HRP plasmids were selected and the cells transfected with other recombinant nanobody plasmids were treated in a similar manner. (B) Supernatants containing 16 nanobodies with HRP fusion proteins against NDV NP proteins were detected using direct ELISA. (C) Interactions between nanobodies with HRP fusion proteins and NDV NP proteins were blocked by the positive chicken sera for antibodies against NDV with competitive ELISA. The results were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Figure 3Preliminary analysis of intracellular expressing nanobodies against NDV NP proteins inhibiting replication of the recombinant NDV-GFP strain in DF1 cells. (A) Results of the intracellular GFP experiments in DF-1 cells infected with recombinant NDV-GFP strain. (B) Fluorescence intensity of the NDV-GFP was shown. The results were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Figure 4Establishment of recombinant DF1 cell lines stably intracellularly expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), Nb3-EGFP, Nb5-EGFP, Nb18-EGFP, Nb30-EGFP, and Nb88-EGFP. (A) All six recombinant DF1 cells lines stably expressing EGFP proteins were observed under a fluorescence microscope. (B) Detection of nanobodies with HA and EGFP tags in the recombinant DF1 cell lines via Western blotting analysis using anti-HA mAbs as primary antibodies. (C) Analysis of cell growth curves of the six recombinant DF1 cell lines. These were determined for cells seeded in 96-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well). Assays were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 5Analysis of the six recombinant DF1 cell lines inhibiting NDV LaSota strain replication. (A) Cytopathic effects of the six recombinant DF1 cell lines inoculated with 0.01 MOI of NDV LaSota strain. (B) Expression levels of NDV NP protein in different recombinant DF1 cell lines inoculated with NDV LaSota strain, as measured by Western blotting using anti-NDV NP mAbs as primary antibodies. The results were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Figure 6Analysis of the four DF1EGFP, DF1Nb18-EGFP, DF1Nb30-EGFP and DF1Nb88-EGFP cell lines inhibiting the replication of different Class II NDV strains, including LaSota, F48E9, JS/17 and sx10. (A) Mean gray values of indirect immunofluorescence detection of the different NDV strains after infection of the different cell lines are shown. (B) Detection of NDV NP proteins in the four recombinant DF1 cell lines inoculated with LaSota, F48E9, JS/17 and sx10 strains. (C) qRT-PCR to detect the transcription level of the different NDV strains NP protein mRNA in different cell lines. (D) Virus titers (TCID50) derived from the supernatant of the four recombinant DF1 cell lines inoculated with the different NDV strains. The results were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± the SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 (two-tailed Student’s t-test).
Figure 7Analysis of the four recombinant DF1 cell lines inhibiting replications of Class I NDV strains (QH-1). (A) Detection of NDV NP proteins in the four recombinant DF1 cell lines inoculated with NDV QH-1 strain by Western blotting. (B) Detection of NDV NP mRNAs in the four recombinant cells inoculated with the QH-1 strain via RT-qPCR assay. The results were performed in triplicate and data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 (two-tailed Student t-test).