| Literature DB >> 36051546 |
Tsai-Chiao Wang1, Chia-Liang Tsai1, Ta-Wei Tang2.
Abstract
The tree density of virtual sportscape is the main factor that determines the benefits that generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients can obtain when they exercise with virtual environment. By using pupil size, fixation count and time as metrics, this research aimed to clarify the relationship between tree cover density and stress in the virtual environment. Ninety GAD patients were randomly grouped into the 36-60% tree density (high tree density, HTDS), 20-35% tree density (medium tree density, MTDS), or control groups (n = 30). Researchers used eye-tracking technology to analyze fixation time, fixation count and changes in pupil size to evaluate the stress changes of participants after 20 min of aerobic exercise in a virtual environment. The results showed that pupil size expanded in GAD patients after exercising in the virtual environment. Furthermore, GAD patient cycling in the MTDS group can show smaller pupil size than those in HTDS. Those results suggest that GAD patient cycling 20 min in the MTDS group can perceived lower stress. The results of eye tracking analysis showed that GAD patients spend more time and counts observing tree elements in HTDS and MTDS sportscapes. Specifically, they spent more 48% and 27% time on tree and green plants in the HTDS condition and MTDS condition, respectively, than in non-natural sportsscapes. Although 36-60% tree density of virtual natural sportscape can get more visual attention from GAD patients, 20-35% tree density of virtual natural sportscape is more capable of reducing their stress.Entities:
Keywords: fixation count; fixation time; pupil size; tree cover density; virtual sportscapes
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051546 PMCID: PMC9424623 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.880586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Figure 1Experimental images. (A) high tree density sportscape (HTDS); (B) medium tree density sportscape (MTDS); (C) control condition. (Experimental images from evening_tao / Freepik).
Figure 2Flowchart of the study.
Figure 3Example images from the HTDS and MTDS that were shown to participants through cave virtual environment.
Baseline demographic characteristics of the participants [mean (SD)].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 58.43 (7.37) | 59.87 (6.99) | 60.85 | 0.25 |
| Gender (M/F) | 13/17 | 14/16 | 14/16 | 0.47 |
| Height (m) | 1.60 (0.08) | 1.60 (0.09) | 1.62 (0.09) | 0.91 |
| Weight (kg) | 60.22 (10.93) | 61.97 (13.28) | 61.11 (12.78) | 0.53 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.54 (1.25) | 21.56 (1.77) | 21.82 (1.34) | 0.88 |
| GAD levels (Medium/low) | 18/12 | 18/12 | 17/13 | 0.47 |
| MMSE (score) | 28.81 (1.44) | 29.13 (1.11) | 28.81 (1.44) | 0.29 |
| GAD-7 (score) | 12.43 (2.73) | 12.73 (3.52) | 12.43 (2.73) | 0.78 |
| Resting HR (count/minute) | 77.91 (6.84) | 79.83 (6.60) | 78.17 (6.65) | 0.46 |
SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; HR, heart rate; HTDS, high tree density sportscape; MTDS, Medium tree density sportscape; HR, heart rate.
Figure 4Pupil size for the high tree density sportscape (HTDS) and the medium tree density sportscape (MTDS) groups at 3 different time points. (**p < 0.01).
Figure 5Pupil size for the high tree density sportscape (HTDS) and the medium tree density sportscape (MTDS) groups during exercise. (**p < 0.01).
Figure 6(A) Average total fixation count for the high tree density sportscape (HTDS) and the medium tree density sportscape (MTDS) groups during exercise. (*p < 0.05). (B) Average total fixation time for the high tree density sportscape (HTDS) and the medium tree density sportscape (MTDS) groups during exercise. (*p < 0.05).