| Literature DB >> 36051314 |
Philippa Harris1, Edna Juga2, Neusa Bay3, Chamila Adams4, Patrícia Nhatitima4, Adjine Mastala2, Nilza Matavel4, Arminda Mufanequisso4, Nelta Mabote4, Eunice Mondlane5, Naisa Manafe2, Paula Pinto3, Ros Kirkland1, David Mazza1, Ana Mocumbi2,6.
Abstract
Background: Unpreparedness of health professionals to address non-communicable diseases (NCD) at peripheral health facilities is a critical health system challenge in Mozambique. To address this weakness and decentralize NCD care, training of the primary care workforce is needed. We describe our experience in the design and implementation of a cascade training of trainers (ToT) intervention to strengthen the prevention and control of cardiovascular disease.Entities:
Keywords: Global Health Partnership; Interprofessional training; Non-communicable diseases; Primary Health Care; hypertension; training of trainers
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051314 PMCID: PMC9354556 DOI: 10.5334/gh.1052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Heart ISSN: 2211-8160
Figure 1Global Health Multilateral Partnership showing stakeholders involved in the project from Mozambique and the UK.
Letshego provided the local sponsorship for the project via a long-term partnership with Primary Care International (PCI). The Mozambique Institute of Health Education and Research (MIHER) acted as the administrative recipient of the PCI/Letshego funding. INS is the research and implementing partner and will have a role in promoting incorporation of research results into policy. The Ministry of Health – through the National Health Service – is the owner of the health facilities and will be the future adopters. Abbreviations: DSCM – Maputo city health directorate, HCM – Maputo Central Hospital and HGM – Mavalane General Hospital.
Figure 2Staged approach and major outputs of Global Health Partnership.
The strategy incorporated a global health partnership that contributed to knowledge transfer in training of evidence-based guidelines and to the creation of a collaborative training site. Contributions from the technical partner in the different stages of the project and main outputs are shown. Abbreviations: INS – Instituto Nacional de Saúde; MGH – Mavalane General Hospital; MoH – Ministry of Health; PCI – Primary Care International; T1 – Trainees Cohort 1; T2 – Trainees Cohort 2; T3 – Trainees Cohort 3.
Figure 3The content of the training curriculum in the workshops.
Shown with the pie area corresponding to the proportion of time allocated to each theme. The training package duration was 24 hours spread over 8 hours daily. This includes time spent on participant registration, adequate refreshment breaks, monitoring and evaluation quiz, post course evaluation questionnaire, certificate presentation and taking of group photograph. See Appendix 1 for more detail.
Figure 4Implementation of Training of Trainers cascade.
Evaluation Tools for Training Workshops.
|
| |
|---|---|
| TOOL | DESCRIPTION |
|
| |
| Knowledge & Self-Reported Clinical Skills and Confidence. |
Knowledge gained during training workshops was measured using anonymized pre- and post-training assessment quizzes completed by participants. The quiz included 10 multiple-choice questions relating to clinical knowledge of HTN, DM and their cardiovascular complications. Pre- and post-course clinical skill confidence in examination of the diabetic foot, and counselling on smoking cessation was measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1 – no confidence, 5 – very confident). |
|
| |
| Participant’s End of Course Evaluation of Training Activities Delivered by Local Trainers. |
Detailed end of course evaluation questionnaire was completed confidentially by participants in training workshops T2 and T3, to understand how the training was viewed by the first-time participants trained by the new local trainers. |
|
| |
| Program Evaluation by Local Trainers. |
At the end of T3 an anonymous feedback survey was obtained from the new local trainers using written questionnaires; the aim was to assess how these new trainers evaluated their experience, assessed the training process, and self-reported their skills and confidence in training, again using a 5-point Likert scale. |
|
| |
Table 2Knowledge & Self-Reported Clinical Skills Confidence Pre- and Post-Training. T1 – Trainees Cohort 1; T2 – Trainees Cohort 2; T3 – Trainees Cohort 3.
Challenges and Lessons learned, presented alongside the five key elements of the TRAIN* framework to promote ToT sustainability (*TRAIN = T – Talent, R- Resources, A-Alignment, I-Implementation, N-Nurture) [15].
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CHALLENGES | DESCRIPTION | LESSONS LEARNED | |
|
| |||
| T | Engagement of TRAINERS | Due to conflicting clinical priorities and heavy workload, there is high risk of low motivation and poor retention in training. |
Create supportive and friendly training environment with time for networking, music and provision of food; Organize regular reminders and communication via WhatsApp, google calendar, SMS or mobile phones; Consider small financial incentives for those coming from far, and include this cost in the budget; Involve major stakeholders to guarantee training as a priority and avoid absences due to clinical duties; Provide professional development support and mentorship by including senior clinicians through the program; Use this activity as part of continuing professional education and include in certification; Incoporate soft skills and capabilities of trainers into training to adopt an ethos of improved quality of care. |
|
| |||
| Diverse background of TRAINEES | Due to extreme shortage of trained doctors in Mozambique, all types of non-physicians and mid-level clinicians who provide frontline care in primary health facilities, were involved in the training cascade. |
Adopt criteria for trainee selection, valuing enthusiasm, personal commitment and career expectations; Select trainees according to their leadership and communication skills, in addition to technical competence; Involve trainees in scheduling of meetings to avoid major schedule constraints; Include different cadres to allow broader understanding of health system challenges and sense of common goal and encourage collaboration between different cadres to achieve effective task sharing within health facilities; Consider building smaller groups according to knowledge levels and skills, to encourage peer-to-peer support; Consider developing new modules for specific areas where the goals may differ for specific health workers. | |
|
| |||
| R | Logistical and administrative challenges | Resources and administrative procedures required for training include change in timetables and displacement from their health facilities to the training site. |
Choose a central location for training of a given catchment area and offer travel vouchers if necessary; Ensure the budget includes provision of food/refreshments to allow full participation after clinical work; Include a checklist of computer, projector, printing capacity and stationery to ensure a good learning environment; Obtain authorization from high level administrative leadership in advance to free trainees’ time schedule; Whenever possible, provide administrative support to the training team. |
|
| |||
| A | Alignment with local health policy | There was a need to align the training content with local health policies, task-shifting strategies, and structure of the national health system. |
Cascade plans and certification need to be discussed with health authorities to be part of individual development; Ensure that the different health care workers within the system are involved to ensure integration of care; Involve non-clinicians (laboratory, pharmacy, procurement) in the initial modules to strengthen team work; Adapt clinical guidelines with prescribing authority regulations for different type and profile of health workers; Acknowledge and incorporate in the guidelines the diversity of primary health care teams within a given setting; Ensure that trainers and trainees are aware of the local strategic plans and set priorities in an inclusive manner. |
|
| |||
| I | Implementation in a different context and environment | For implementation, adaptations to the content of guidelines and training materials were needed, due to different drug availability, level of frontline health professionals and prescription norms. |
Guarantee local ownership of the program for implementation of cascade training; Recognize and address unique challenges through open discussion with local stakeholders; Consider the implementation of a pilot clinic alongside the training program to highlight operational issues early; Engage the participants in the process of incorporating new clinical guidelines into the clinical setting; Use clinical outcome data and qualitative analysis to strengthen evidence to inform change. |
|
| |||
| N | Nurturing the program to ensure sustainability | In the context of high service demand and under-resourcing of the health services there is a risk of suspension of the program once the external support ends. |
Ensure 360 degree evaluation of the cascade training to increase skills and confidence of trainers and trainees; Provide continuous coaching of new local trainers and provide learning resources to maintain programme quality; Leverage local partnerships to obtain buy-in and additional financial and logistical support for the program; Liaise with local health authorities and academic institutions to ensure program adoption after external funding; Ensure data on training skills gained and lessons from cascade training implementation are collected; Data collection systems should be planned for future communication with local health information systems. |
|
| |||