Literature DB >> 36050608

Pediatric endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (pesma) with liposuction in adolescents with gynecomastia.

François Varlet1, Ciro Esposito2, Aurelien Scalabre1, Benedetta Lepore3, Sophie Vermersch1, Maria Escolino3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical techniques for treatment of gynecomastia are increasingly less invasive. We described technical standardization of pediatric endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (PESMA) with liposuction.
METHODS: All adolescents with primary gynecomastia, operated using PESMA with liposuction over the period June 2014-July 2021, were included. The video recording of procedures was analyzed to standardize the operative technique. After patient installation, 3 trocars were placed on the mid-axillary line. The technique included 5 steps: (1) subcutaneous injection of lipolysis solution and liposuction; (2) creation of working space using an inflated balloon; (3) gland dissection using 5-mm sealing device; (4) specimen extraction through the largest trocar orifice; and (5) placement of suction drainage tube.
RESULTS: Twenty-four male adolescents, operated for Simon's grade 2B and 3 gynecomastia using PESMA with liposuction over the study period, were included. Mean patient age was 16 years (range 15-18). Gynecomastia was bilateral in 19/24 (79.2%) and unilateral in 5/24 (20.8%). One (4.1%) conversion to open was reported. The mean operative time was 87 min (range 98-160) for unilateral and 160 min (range 140-250) for bilateral procedure. The mean length of stay was 2.2 days (range 1-4). Patients wore a thoracic belt for 15 up to 30 days postoperatively. Post-operative complications occurred in 5/24 (20.8%): 2- or 3 mm second-degree burns in 4 (16.7%) and subcutaneous seroma in 1 (4.1%). All complications were Clavien 2 grade and did not require further treatment. Aesthetic outcomes were very good in 21/24 (87.5%). Three (12.5%) boys had persistent minimal breast asymmetry but did never perceive it negatively.
CONCLUSION: PESMA combined with liposuction was feasible and safe for surgical treatment of gynecomastia in this selected cohort of patients. Although challenging, this procedure provided good aesthetic results, with no scars on the anterior thoracic wall. Standardization of the operative technique was a key point for successful outcome.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Endoscopic; Gynecomastia; Liposuction; MIS; Technique

Year:  2022        PMID: 36050608     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09550-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  3 in total

1.  Gynecomastia - evaluation and current treatment options.

Authors:  Ruth E Johnson; Cindy A Kermott; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Single-incision surgery for gynecomastia using TriPort: A case report.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Yong Han; Kai Cheng; Xiao-Hong Wang; Fengli Guo; Zhen-Lin Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Management of Adolescent Gynecomastia: An Update.

Authors:  Ashraf T Soliman; Vincenzo De Sanctis; Mohamed Yassin
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2017-08-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.