Literature DB >> 36050542

Effect of nurse-led telephone follow-up on postoperative symptoms and analgesics consumption after benign hysterectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, four-arm, controlled multicenter trial.

Gulnara Kassymova1, Gunilla Sydsjö2, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin2, Lena Nilsson3, Preben Kjølhede2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine if planned telephone follow-up, especially when adding structured, oriented coaching, reduces the intensity of postoperative symptoms and decreases analgesics consumption after benign hysterectomy.
METHODS: A randomized, single-blinded, four-armed, controlled multicenter trial of 525 women scheduled for hysterectomy was conducted in 5 hospitals in the southeast health region of Sweden. The women were allocated 1:1:1:1 into four follow-up models: (A) no telephone follow-up (control group); (B) one planned, structured, telephone follow-up the day after discharge; (C) as B but with additional telephone follow-up once weekly for 6 weeks; and (D) as C but with oriented coaching telephone follow-up on all occasions. Postoperative symptoms were assessed using the Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire. Analgesic consumption was registered. Unplanned telephone contacts and visits were registered during the 6 weeks of follow-up.
RESULTS: In total, 487 women completed the study. Neither pain intensity, nor symptom sum score or analgesic consumption differed between the intervention groups. Altogether, 224 (46.0%) women had unplanned telephone contacts and 203 (41.7%) had unplanned visits. Independent of intervention, the women with unplanned telephone contacts had higher pain intensity and symptom sum scores, particularly if an unplanned telephone contact was followed by a visit, or an unplanned visit was preceded by an unplanned telephone contact.
CONCLUSION: Telephone follow-up did not seem to affect recovery regarding symptoms or analgesic consumption after benign hysterectomy in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. Unplanned telephone contacts and visits were associated with more postoperative symptoms, especially pain. Trial registration The study is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01526668 retrospectively from January 27; 2012. Date of enrolment of first patient: October 11; 2011.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coaching; ERAS; Hysterectomy; Postoperative symptoms; Telephone follow-up

Year:  2022        PMID: 36050542     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06722-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  17 in total

1.  Disturbing post-operative symptoms are not reduced by prophylactic antiemetic treatment in patients at high risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  A Alkaissi; H Gunnarsson; V Johnsson; K Evertsson; L Ofenbartl; S Kalman
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part I.

Authors:  G Nelson; A D Altman; A Nick; L A Meyer; P T Ramirez; C Achtari; J Antrobus; J Huang; M Scott; L Wijk; N Acheson; O Ljungqvist; S C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  What does it really mean to "recover" from an operation?

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Tung Tran; Nancy E Mayo; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Continuity of care in ambulatory surgery critical pathways: the patients' perceptions.

Authors:  Marja Renholm; Tarja Suominen; Ann-Marie Turtiainen; Helena Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  'They are marvellous with you whilst you are in but the aftercare is rubbish': a grounded theory study of patients' and their carers' experiences after discharge following day surgery.

Authors:  Anne Mottram
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Mode of anesthesia and postoperative symptoms following abdominal hysterectomy in a fast-track setting.

Authors:  Ninnie Borendal Wodlin; Lena Nilsson; Kristofer Arestedt; Preben Kjølhede
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Patients' experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Tonje Sibbern; Vibeke Bull Sellevold; Simen A Steindal; Craig Dale; Judy Watt-Watson; Alfhild Dihle
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  How Do We Value Postoperative Recovery?: A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Patient-reported Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Julio F Fiore; Sabrina Figueiredo; Saba Balvardi; Lawrence Lee; Bénédicte Nauche; Tara Landry; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II.

Authors:  G Nelson; A D Altman; A Nick; L A Meyer; P T Ramirez; C Achtari; J Antrobus; J Huang; M Scott; L Wijk; N Acheson; O Ljungqvist; S C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Postoperative recovery from the perspective of day surgery patients: a phenomenographic study.

Authors:  Katarina Berg; Kristofer Arestedt; Karin Kjellgren
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.