Literature DB >> 36048368

Transitions in frailty state 12 months after kidney transplantation: a prospective cohort study.

Milena Dos Santos Mantovani1, Nyara Coelho de Carvalho1, Marcos Ferreira Minicucci2, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade2, Ricardo de Souza Cavalcante3, Gabriel Berg de Almeida3, Nara Aline Costa4, Julhiany de Fátima da Silva3, Ricardo Augusto Monteiro de Barros Almeida5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frailty is associated with several unfavorable outcomes after kidney transplantation (KTx). However, limited information is available regarding the transitions in frailty state and its components after KTx. This study aimed to evaluate the transitions in physical frailty phenotype and its components over a period of 12 months after KTx.
METHODS: In this prospective single-center cohort study, we measured physical frailty phenotype (PFP) and its components at the time of admission for KTx and 12 months after KTx. The evaluation includes five components: weakness (grip strength analysed by sex and body mass index quartiles), physical activity (kcals/week based on the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity questionnaire), exhaustion (self-report using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), gait speed (time taken to walk 15 feet based on sex and height-specific cutoff), and unintentional weight loss (self-report of unintentional weight loss > 10 lbs in the last year). The exhaustion and physical activity components are validated in the Brazilian population. Each component is scored as 0 or 1 according to its presence or absence, and a PFP score of 3-5 defines frailty, 2 is intermediate, and 0-1 is rated as non-frail. We used the McNemar and Wilcoxon test to compare physical frailty phenotype and its components between the two periods.
RESULTS: Among 87 patients included in the study, 16.1% were classified as frail, 20.7% as intermediately frail, and 63.2% as non-frail. Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis to evaluate transitions in frailty. At the time of admission for KTx, 15.6% of patients were defined as frail compared to 4.7% of patients at 12 months after KTx (p = 0.023). Among the physical frailty phenotype components, the proportion of patients who scored in the weight loss category 12 months after KTx was significantly lower than that at the time of KTx (6.3% vs 34.4%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a 69.9% reduction in the prevalence of frail patients at the end of the 12-month follow-up after KTx. Among the components of frailty, weight loss showed a significant improvement.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Frailty; Kidney transplantation; Physical frailty phenotype

Year:  2022        PMID: 36048368     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01436-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   4.393


  41 in total

1.  Frailty and delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Priyanka Govindan; Jack W Grinnan; Minghao Liu; Hassan M Ali; Anindita Chakraborty; Vaibhav Jain; Reside L Ros; Nathan T James; Lauren M Kucirka; Erin C Hall; Jonathan C Berger; Robert A Montgomery; Niraj M Desai; Nabil N Dagher; Christopher J Sonnenday; Michael J Englesbe; Martin A Makary; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Frailty and Transplantation.

Authors:  Leonie Exterkate; Bendix R Slegtenhorst; Matthias Kelm; Midas Seyda; Jeroen M Schuitenmaker; Markus Quante; Hirofumi Uehara; Abdala El Khal; Stefan G Tullius
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Frailty syndrome and pre-operative risk evaluation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Cristina Buigues; Pilar Juarros-Folgado; Julio Fernández-Garrido; Rut Navarro-Martínez; Omar Cauli
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Frailty as a predictor of future falls in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiuyan Lan; Hong Li; Zijuan Wang; Ying Chen
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

Authors:  L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 6.  Frailty as a predictor of disabilities among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gotaro Kojima
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 7.  Frail phenotype and mortality prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Shu-Fang Chang; Pei-Ling Lin
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.837

8.  The prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes in general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Hewitt; Sara Long; Ben Carter; Simon Bach; Kathryn McCarthy; Andrew Clegg
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Frailty and Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien E Quint; Donika Zogaj; Louise B D Banning; Stan Benjamens; Coby Annema; Stephan J L Bakker; Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Robert A Pol
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 10.  Quality of life is substantially worse for community-dwelling older people living with frailty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas F Crocker; Lesley Brown; Andrew Clegg; Katherine Farley; Matthew Franklin; Samantha Simpkins; John Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.