| Literature DB >> 36048352 |
Fugen Jiang1,2,3, Muli Deng1,2,3, Jie Tang1,2,3, Liyong Fu1,4, Hua Sun5,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fast and accurate forest aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation and mapping is the basic work of forest management and ecosystem dynamic investigation, which is of great significance to evaluate forest quality, resource assessment, and carbon cycle and management. The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2), as one of the latest launched spaceborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors, can penetrate the forest canopy and has the potential to obtain accurate forest vertical structure parameters on a large scale. However, the along-track segments of canopy height provided by ICESat-2 cannot be used to obtain comprehensive AGB spatial distribution. To make up for the deficiency of spaceborne LiDAR, the Sentinel-2 images provided by google earth engine (GEE) were used as the medium to integrate with ICESat-2 for continuous AGB mapping in our study. Ensemble learning can summarize the advantages of estimation models and achieve better estimation results. A stacking algorithm consisting of four non-parametric base models which are the backpropagation (BP) neural network, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) was proposed for AGB modeling and estimating in Saihanba forest farm, northern China.Entities:
Keywords: Aboveground biomass; Carbon cycle and management; Google earth engine; ICESat-2; Machine learning; Remote sensing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36048352 PMCID: PMC9438156 DOI: 10.1186/s13021-022-00212-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Carbon Balance Manag ISSN: 1750-0680
Fig. 1Location and boundary of the study area
Fig. 2a The altitude distribution with the ICESat-2 data and b the selected ATL08 segments covering within forest land in Saihanba
The spectral variables extracted from Sentinel-2 used in this study
| Spectral variable | Description |
|---|---|
| Band reflectance | B2-Blue, B3-Green, B4-Red, B5-Red Edge1, B6-Red Edge2, B7-Red Edge3, B8-NIR, B8A-Red Edge4, B11-SWIR1, B12-SWIR2 |
| Vegetation index | Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) |
| Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) | |
| Red-Green Vegetation Index (RGVI) | |
| Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) | |
| Red Edge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (RENDVI) | |
| Red Edge Chlorophyll Index (RECI) | |
| Red Edge Simple Ratio (RESR) |
Allometric growth equation based on different tree species for AGB calculation
| Tree Specie | Plot number | Allometric equation |
|---|---|---|
| Birch | 1210 | 0.0278601(D2H)0.993386 |
| Larch | 3027 | 0.046238(D2H)0.905002 |
| Poplar/Oak | 218 | 0.044(D2H)0.9169 + 0.023(D2H)0.7115 + 0.0104(D2H)0.9994 + 0.0188(D2H)0.8024 |
| Chinese Pine | 19 | 0.027639(D2H)0.9905 + 0.0091313(D2H)0.982 + 0.0045755(D2H)0.9894 |
| Spruce | 60 | 0.067732(D2H)0.865949 |
| Scots Pine | 862 | 0.3364D2.0067 + 0.2983D1.144 + 0.2931D0.8486 |
| Total | 5396 | – |
Fig. 3The mean and standard deviation of AGB values under seven tree species in Saihanba
Fig. 4The basic framework of the stacking method
Fig. 5Partial importance ranking of the LiDAR variables extracted from ICESat-2
Fig. 6RMSE change based on a spectral variables, b spectral variables and LiDAR variables
Fig. 7Scatter plots of the observed AGB against the predicted values by a BP, b kNN, c SVM, d RF and e stacking using the spectral variables (Mg/ha)
Fig. 8Scatter plots of the observed AGB against the predicted values by a BP, b kNN, c SVM, d RF and e stacking using the spectral variables and LiDAR variables extracted from ICESat-2 (Mg/ha)
Fig. 9Continuous spatial distribution of AGB in Saihanba
Fig. 10a Correlation coefficient matrix of LiDAR variables and AGB, and scatter plots of the observed AGB against the predicted values by linear regression using b the spectral variables, and c spectral variables and LiDAR variables (Mg/ha)