Kathryn E Lancaster1, Stacy Endres-Dighe2, Ana D Sucaldito2, Hannah Piscalko2, Aarti Madhu3, Tetiana Kiriazova4, Abigail W Batchelder3,5. 1. College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. lancaster.111@osu.edu. 2. College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Ukrainian Institute On Public Health Policy, Kiev, Ukraine. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Persistent stigma remains a crucial barrier to HIV prevention and treatment services among people who use drugs (PWUD), particularly for those living with or at-risk for HIV. This scoping review examines the current state of science with regard to approaches for measuring and addressing stigma within HIV interventions among PWUD. RECENT FINDINGS: Sixteen studies fit the inclusion criteria for this review. Half the studies originated within the USA, and the remaining represented four different regions. Within these studies, stigma was measured using various quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. The studies primarily focused on HIV stigma, including value-based judgments, anticipated stigma, and perceived stigma domains. Information-based and skills building approaches at the individual level were the most common for the stigma reduction interventions. Adoption of systematic evaluations is needed for measuring stigma, including intersectional stigma, within HIV interventions among PWUD. Future studies should focus on developing multilevel intersectional stigma reduction interventions for PWUD with and at-risk for HIV globally.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Persistent stigma remains a crucial barrier to HIV prevention and treatment services among people who use drugs (PWUD), particularly for those living with or at-risk for HIV. This scoping review examines the current state of science with regard to approaches for measuring and addressing stigma within HIV interventions among PWUD. RECENT FINDINGS: Sixteen studies fit the inclusion criteria for this review. Half the studies originated within the USA, and the remaining represented four different regions. Within these studies, stigma was measured using various quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. The studies primarily focused on HIV stigma, including value-based judgments, anticipated stigma, and perceived stigma domains. Information-based and skills building approaches at the individual level were the most common for the stigma reduction interventions. Adoption of systematic evaluations is needed for measuring stigma, including intersectional stigma, within HIV interventions among PWUD. Future studies should focus on developing multilevel intersectional stigma reduction interventions for PWUD with and at-risk for HIV globally.
Authors: Maurice Musheke; Harriet Ntalasha; Sara Gari; Oran McKenzie; Virginia Bond; Adriane Martin-Hilber; Sonja Merten Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Louisa Degenhardt; Amy Peacock; Samantha Colledge; Janni Leung; Jason Grebely; Peter Vickerman; Jack Stone; Evan B Cunningham; Adam Trickey; Kostyantyn Dumchev; Michael Lynskey; Paul Griffiths; Richard P Mattick; Matthew Hickman; Sarah Larney Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 26.763